By Eric B. Meyer
Like most employers, you likely have a workforce comprised of both non-exempt and exempt employees.
Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, non-exempt employees who work more than 40 hours in a workweek must be paid OT. Employers don’t need to pay OT to exempt employees.
Let’s assume that, each year, you provide your workforce with a bank of paid time off (PTO). Let’s further assume that you implement a policy that mandates that any additional leave be taken in unpaid full-day increments, event if the employee only needs a few hours off.
Is that policy legal? Or does it violate the FLSA?
According to this recent federal-court decision (Kulish v. Rite Aid Corp. and Eckerd Corp), that policy is OK for two reasons:
If you are going to implement a policy like this one, be careful.
Remember that you cannot dock pay if an employee takes a partial day off by arriving late or leaving early. That may destroy the exemption and could lead to OT issues.
Additionally, while the FLSA regulations permit deductions from pay for absences of one or more full days occasioned by sickness or disability (including work-related accidents), that deduction must be made in accordance with a bona fide plan, policy or practice of providing compensation for loss of salary occasioned by such sickness or disability.
No sweat, right? It’s no wonder that wage-and-hour lawsuits are so common these days.
This was originally published on Eric B. Meyer’s blog, The Employer Handbook.