By Eric B. Meyer
Early in my legal career, a colleague taught me this expression: pigs get fed; hogs get slaughtered. Essentially, be aggressive. But push too hard, and you may lose it all.
Some companies in my state (Pennsylvania) and others require their new hires to sign an agreement requiring them to arbitrate any claims that arise out of the employment relationship. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that agreements requiring employees to arbitrate employment-related claims are ok. However, in Pennsylvania (as in other states), when those agreements are too one-sided, courts deem them unconscionable and, therefore, unenforceable.
So remember, pigs get fed; hogs get slaughtered. And thanks to a decision the Philadelphia-based Third U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals handed down yesterday, employers in Pennsylvania and the Third Circuit now have a better blueprint as to how to avoid unconscionable arbitration agreements.
The case is Quillon v. Tenet HealthSystem Philadelphia, Inc. I’ll skip the facts and get right to the tips:
Most importantly, make sure that employees understand what they are signing. So, when you provide the arbitration agreement to your new hire — whether as a standalone or as part of an employee handbook — confirm that the employee acknowledges that to which he/she is agreeing.
This was originally published on Eric B. Meyer’s blog, The Employer Handbook.