In the private sector business world, virtually every company has a policy covering travel advances to employees.
I’ve dealt with a number of different versions of the fabled travel advance policy at various companies, but they all had one thing in common: they were monitored closely and were usually tough as hell.
Travel is something I have done a lot in my career, and for the most part, the option on travel expenses was either to A) put it on your own credit card (rare was the company I worked for that had – or let you use – a company card) and then put in for expenses; or, B) get an advance and then file and expense report minus the advance when you returned from the trip.
I quickly learned that option A was usually the better approach, although it meant loading up your own credit card with company expenses. The reason? It was because all the company accounting departments I dealt with treated travel advances the same way that a cat does guarding a cornered mouse. In other words, they closely watched money advanced to employees and were quick to subtract the advance from your paycheck if you didn’t file an expense report and reconcile it quickly enough.
In fact, I found this quick-on-the-draw accounting approach to settling travel advances so much of a bother that I simply refused to go this route and loaded up my own personal credit card instead. That’s because I could take a little more time on the expense report, and, because accounting departments don’t worry all that much when it’s your money tied up on your credit card.
That’s why this story about how my home State of California negligently and incompetently forget about millions of dollars of cash advances made to employees is so disturbing, because it is something you would rarely (if ever) see happen in the private sector. Here’s the gist of it, from the San Francisco Chronicle:
Gov. Jerry Brown ordered state agencies … to do a better job collecting money after an audit discovered that 11 state agencies had failed to gather $13.3 million in debts, mostly from employees who received cash advances.
At issue are millions of dollars in salary or travel advances that were paid to employees and never recouped by the state. An audit issued by state Controller John Chiang in 2010 found that many departments were failing to collect this money, in some cases for years. The Department of Transportation was named the biggest scofflaw, with $3.2 million owed.
“It’s shocking that the state has apparently failed to collect millions of dollars in salary and travel advances owed by state employees,” Brown said. “This situation reinforces the worst stereotype of ineffective and inefficient government, and I have ordered state agencies to immediately investigate the backlog of uncollected debts and find every penny owed to taxpayers.”
State employees are required to pay back all money advanced to them for trip expenses that isn’t spent on state business. Salary advances are supposed to be taken out of future paychecks.
The governor ordered managers to clear salary and travel advances within 30 days and review revolving fund reports on a monthly basis. If salary and travel advances are not resolved within a month, the governor ordered state agencies to deduct the money from the employees’ paychecks.”
It’s good that the State of California is going to crack down on this, but it makes me wonder: where is the accounting department in all this? How is it that something that is a routine practice in the private sector – closely tracking and reconciling cash advances made to employees for travel – is handled in such a lax and cavalier manner in at least one, huge state government?
You know the answer to that, I’m afraid, and it just goes to show you that yes, government would do well to operate more like a business sometimes.
But there’s a lot more in the news this week than bad government accounting procedures. Here are some other HR and workplace-related items you may have missed. This is TLNT’s weekly round-up of news, trends, and insights from the world of HR and talent management. Yes, I do it so you don’t have to.