What do you do when fear has you paralyzed and it’s preventing you from taking steps that your job demands?
Most self-help gurus I’ve read would probably say, “It’s time to face that fear and do what needs to be done. The fear is always worse than the worst case scenario.” But what if the fear you’re feeling is legitimate, a real threat?
That’s the kind of situation in which many HR leaders find themselves.
Focused on hiring and developing the right talent, smart HR leaders are looking at tools that provide the insights and data to optimize their processes. The problem is, the success of such tools is often dependent on others within the organization using the tools properly, or at all. That’s never truer than when we speak of behavior or personality assessments.
In our recent McQuaig Global Talent Recruitment Survey, HR professionals told us that they haven’t implemented behavior or personality assessments because they fear hiring managers won’t use them (22 percent) or will use them incorrectly (24 percent).
Some hiring managers, they fear, will use the assessments as a crutch, and simply go along blindly with whatever the assessment recommended. Others may do the opposite – preferring their own judgment, they might just toss the assessment results in the trash.
Either way, the assessments won’t do much to help hire and develop the right people – and that could make HR look bad.
I believe that this fear is well founded. In a previous TLNT article, we noted that getting hiring managers engaged in the recruitment process was the No. 1 challenge facing HR.
Many assessments today just exacerbate the problem. They’re often so difficult for hiring managers, and even HR professionals, to understand and use, that they practically invite the kinds of problems HR is worried about.
I also believe that it’s possible, and profitable, to overcome this risk. There is now a large body of evidence demonstrating that behavior and personality assessments can substantially and measurably reduce the risk of failed hires.
A 2010 study by the Aberdeen Group, for example, found that organizations using assessments had a 75 percent year-over-year decrease in hiring costs, when compared with organizations that don’t use assessments, and a 250 percent greater year-over-year increase in profit per full-time equivalent.
The key to overcoming the risk and ridding yourself of those nightmares lies in finding the assessment that fits with your organization and then ensuring proper implementation.
Here is how you do that:
When assessments are difficult to use and disconnected from the specific job being hired for, they’re unlikely to be used as intended, and all the fears of HR leaders may come to pass.
If, however, assessments are transparent, understandable and easy to use for everyone – HR professionals, hiring managers and job candidates alike – then they are far more likely to achieve their goals