Not being much of a basketball fan, I admit I have not watched any of the current NBA Finals between Dallas and Miami.
The recap on ESPN during my workout is about it. When I grew up in the south it was always about football, never about basketball.
However, one of the things that has always caught my eye about sports was the amount of metrics that teams compile. While having team leaders with high metrics in each category never assures a winning team, I find it interesting how everything is tracked.
From a Human Capital perspective, I find these metrics awesome. HR execs today are finding it near impossible to connect the dots across the organization, which in a lot of cases limits our ability as to where to start in making a difference in people’s performance.
In basketball, an assist is attributed to a player who passes the ball to a teammate in a way that leads to a score by field goal, meaning that he or she was “assisting” in the basket. This metric is also tracked in hockey.
Every day we are faced with an array of issues that are silently screaming out for help, whether it is a friend who is out of work, going through transition, or just totally lost due to the complexity of finding employment in a new era. More often than not, it is the job seeker who is reaching out to ask for the opportunity to work in your organization.
Our job descriptions call for certain areas of responsibilities that are fully documented. Theoretically this is the narrow sphere that we are to operate in. However since our domain is basically people, we are constantly dealing with areas that are out of our focus and that we could silently overlook. No one would know or probably care. No one is looking
Character could be defined as what we do or who we are when we think that no one is watching! Would we react the same if someone was watching.
Character may be manifested in the great moments, but it is made in the small ones.”
– Phillip Brooks
I was following a discussion article a while back concerning HR — specifically recruiters. Some of the stories that were posted by job seekers about the treatment that they received from the “Gatekeepers” of the organization were reprehensible.
You almost wanted to say that no one in our field would ever respond that way. But as I read through them, I realized that I had personally heard some of the same stories.
In a lot of cases, the initial connection with an organization will be through this most important function. This is why I have always felt that Talent Management starts with outreach. This sets the tone going forward.
Did we pass this first test of interaction? This interaction begins to color candidates’ perception of the type organization that we are. Regardless of what we say on our website, regardless of what we say in our mission or value statement, this first contact is the first building block. Are we assisting them in a way that, if it does not work out, will leave them with a positive narrative to tell about our organization?
I applaud the efforts of several folks in our industry that are doing great things to get our co-workers back to work.
Did they have to do this? Did they really have the time to get this started? Probably not, but that is what they did when no one was looking.
If we each had to compile a stat about our assist rate, what would it be? Not only that, but let’s also compile this rate based on what we did outside the confines of our job/job description.
So as this recovery sputters along, it is up to all of us to reach out and give a hand. The best and most gratifying assist is when no one is looking.
Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath, swearing to practice medicine ethically. HR does not have that threshold, but if we did, would we be carrying out that oath to uphold our profession?
What is your answer when no one is looking?
