Do your clients see you as a great recruiter – or as a necessary evil in the recruiting process? Here’s a test we’ve developed to see if you’ve got what it takes to be considered a great recruiter – the kind of person clients look upon as an advisor and who they consult often. Look at each of the factors below, then rank yourself on a score of 0-5, 5 being the best. Factor 1: Understanding The Job WEAK: Doesn’t understand job needs, even if uses traditional job spec. Has little knowledge of the job and the types of people who are competent. (SCORE 0) FAIR: Very passive. Accepts traditional skills and experience job spec as only standard. Knows the job, but too much reliance on finding an exact match. (SCORE 1) GOOD: Gets client to balance traditional job spec by adding some elements addressing potential and performance. Expands on job spec by adding more clarifying info. (SCORE 3) GREAT: Insures that all interviewers clearly understand the key top 5-8 performance objectives of position. Asks, “What does person need to do to be successful?” (SCORE 5) Factor 2: Finding Candidates WEAK: Takes too long. Finds only average candidates. (SCORE 0) FAIR: Traditional. Writes average ads, contacts lots of people with average uninspiring pitch, few calls returned. Not trusted by candidates. (SCORE 1) GOOD: Calls returned quickly. Works hard. Knows difference between strong and average candidate. Great internet tools. Leverages network. Might take too long. (SCORE 3) GREAT: Gains candidate trust. Well connected. Very creative. Writes great ads, heavy use of referrals, networks to find top candidates, Delivers top people in weeks. (SCORE 5) Factor 3: Presenting Candidates WEAK: Unprofessional. Sends in lots of paper with hope that something sticks. (SCORE 0) FAIR: Traditional. Solid candidates, but loses good candidates by not thinking out of the box. Can’t overcome minor candidate weaknesses, so gives in. (SCORE 1) GOOD: Aggressive. Presents good candidates, but doesn’t present compelling reason why candidate doesn’t meet spec. Forces candidates in. (SCORE 3) GREAT: Only needs 3-5 people. Professional presentation summarizing fit to job. Inspires confidence. Precludes client from dismissing candidate lightly. (SCORE 5) Factor 4: Managing The Client WEAK: Not even a part of the process. Once a candidate is sent in the recruiter is no longer involved. (SCORE 0) FAIR: Has to fight to stay involved. Goes in through back doors. Bypasses necessary groups. Not a part of the evaluation process. (SCORE 1) GOOD: Part of the evaluation process, but not leading the whole process. Counsel is sought only when necessary. Provides sound advice, but considered a biased source. (SCORE 3) GREAT: Understands the internal process and manages all phases. Works with all interviewers to insure candidate gets evaluated properly. Gets prompt and accurate feedback. Advice is sought. (SCORE 5) Factor 5: Managing The Candidate WEAK: Candidate does not rely on advice at all. Communication with candidate is minimal. Offer process conducted by client. (SCORE 0) FAIR: Limited involvement after candidate presented. Not trusted by candidate. Has to push process. Candidate doesn’t call back. (SCORE 1) GOOD: Trusted by the candidate. Involved in most aspects of the interviewing and offer process. Gets feedback from client. Has partial control of negotiating process. (SCORE 3) GREAT: Understands candidate motivation. Extremely well-trusted by client and candidate. Controls all phases of the interviewing and offer process. Closes the deal. (SCORE 5) Assessing Yourself If you can’t get at least a 20 on this self-assessment test, you’re losing some great opportunities. This is the threshold for the advisory category. You’re a necessary evil if your score is in the 10-20 point range. If you score below 10 (unless you’re just a researcher), you’re working way to hard, and need some quick training right away. <*SPONSORMESSAGE*>
Advertisement
Just How Good A Recruiter Are You? Here’s A Test!
Get articles like this
in your inbox
The longest running and most trusted source of information serving talent acquisition professionals.
Advertisement
Related Articles
Recruiters Say They Want Adaptable Talent. Why Do Their Processes Filter It Out?
Trond Arne Undheim | Jan 6, 2026
The Counteroffer Conundrum: Why Recruiters Keep Losing a Game That Shouldn’t Be Played
Jim Stroud | May 6, 2025
The Meaningful Meh
Kevin Grossman | Mar 11, 2025