It’s back to school time, and back to campus recruiting. The routine of information sessions, on-campus interviews, follow-up interviews, and cross-your-fingers-and-hope- they-accept offers cycles on. Yet, the world has changed drastically since these techniques were developed. Information sessions started because it was difficult for a college junior or senior to learn much about most companies. On-campus interviews started because they were the most efficient and cheapest way to get a sampling of the students. And, all of these techniques were built on a simple premise: there were far more candidates than available jobs. Today, information about most companies is abundant and easy to find on the Internet, in magazines and on television. Almost every major company, and many smaller ones, is well known and easy to learn about. Information isn’t the problem, interpreting and understanding the information has become the bigger issue. When a candidate reads about a new Internet start up, for example, what runs through her mind? Will it still be around when I graduate? What kind of options does it give? What would I do? My major is (fill-in the blank); how does that fit into this company? Information sessions are way to general to answer these questions for most people. Even interviewing is different: candidates are interviewing YOU as much as you are interviewing them. They want to know more that candidates did a few years ago – and they have more options and choices. You have to use the interview as a marketing opportunity, and that’s very hard to do in a 20-minute campus session. You also have better technology today. Companies can choose video interviews or on-line chats, and travel is cheap and easy compared to 5 or 10 years ago. Flying a candidate a few hundred miles for a day is common and may be cheaper and a better marketing ploy than sending a bevy of interviewers to campus for a few days. And the basic premise, too, has completely reversed itself. There are far more jobs than candidates these days in most areas. So how does a college recruiter adapt to these changes? Here are five suggestions:
It may seem like there is no need for change. I am sure most of you are saying, “I don’t have any trouble getting all the college students I need.” Or “We still have more applicants than jobs.” I urge you to remember that similar thoughts were expressed by the carriage manufacturers when cars were introduced, by the ice man said when refrigerators were new, and by the telegraph operators when the phone company started. The lesson is that change is inevitable and, although perhaps slow and hard to see at first, the way we do college recruiting is changing, too. The questions is whether you are ready or not.