I know football is America’s most popular sport, but I’ve got baseball on my brain because the Major League playoffs are here. One of the most important positions in the batting order is the “cleanup hitter,” who bats fourth in the lineup and is expected to “clean up” the bases by driving in runners. There’s a parallel in the business and non-profit world. Let me try to explain.
I was recently asked to present on my best practice system for hiring salespeople at a conference in Orlando and realized I couldn’t talk hiring until step four at the soonest. There are three actions you need to take — all related to cleaning up your culture — before you should start hiring.
Workers who are successful, fun, and have high character do exist. Hold out to hire them. A typical recruiter and hiring manager error is to hire only for skills. They make a rushed decision based on the resume and then pray they candidate doesn’t offend them during the interview. If there’s no obvious friction, a job offer is made.
Your pre-employment interviews should be structured to determine if the candidate is a good match for your company in four areas: skills, personality, character, and mapping. Here are some questions you should be able to answer about every candidate’s character before you wrap up your interview process:
The core question related to mapping is, “Does the candidate have the psychological makeup to be inclined to perform the activities of the job?” For example, a sales candidate who has the skills to acquire new business (aka. a “getter” or a hunter”) but finds that activity causes then emotional anguish will not perform that activity consistently and is unlikely to succeed at your job. They are better off being a “keeper” or a “farmer” if they choose to remain in sales.
Hold out for a candidate who hits or exceededs your target — your new target after you’ve raised your standards beyond just skills and personality.
Another key cleaning-up act before hiring new employees is keeping around only the people who match your culture. You need to give underperforming employees a chance to get good, but the time they have to reach your standard should be measured in months at the most, not quarters or years.
I was just talking to a small business manager, and he was lamenting how he’s been too slow to let people go. He agreed with me that when you do eventually terminate an employee for poor performance, you almost always realize in the days or weeks after they leave that you had only seen the tip of the iceberg.
Before you go terminating anyone, you need to have evidence if the employee is performing to your standards or not. If supervisors don’t have these fundamental systems in place, you have some blind spots for employee performance:
The backdrop to those meetings is that you must have two-way candor in all your conversations. Managers need to be skeptical of performance and validate with facts, not make judgments solely on feelings. And this doesn’t just apply to current employees. Your hiring process should be candid; it’s not just a coronation of the least-worst person who applied for the job.
Again, give underperforming employees a chance to meet your standard, but it shouldn’t take quarters or years to do so. If they can’t cut it, you need to cut the cord for the sake of your culture.
In the business best seller Good To Great, Jim Collins talks about not just discipline but “rigorous discipline.” You need to be disciplined enough to develop a thorough plan to ensure you effectively onboard and train new hires. And while I’m throwing around book quotes, let me share this one from Execution: “Execution is the missing link between aspirations and results.”
I know you have limited resources, so I’m not suggesting you create a 350-page epic Ode To Training. But you need something specific and reasonably detailed. Here are seven fundamental aspects of new-hire training programs that I’ve seen work wonders:
Once these fundamentals are in place and your culture is cleaned up, you’re ready to move forward with hiring a new employee.