The weekly wrap is where TLNT shares the stories that didn’t quite make it into a full post this week. We’ll also share links to some of our favorite things we read this week about HR, people development, the future of work, and more.
As I’m closing out my first week as editor of TLNT, I wanted to make sure I’d always have a column where I could share what didn’t make it into the publication but what deserves to be mentioned anyway. For long time readers, this isn’t exactly a new idea. There are a lot of topics to cover and only so much time.
So, I’ll use the weekly wrap to share some quick links from the week that you may have missed, occasionally say snarky things, share videos or social media posts, and clear out the rest of my inbox for our wonderful readers so I can start next week fresh.
Let’s do this.
LinkedIn CEO Jeff Weiner is moving to an executive chairman role starting in June, with the current head of product Ryan Roslansky taking over. Weiner held the position for eleven years and saw the social network go from venture-backed startup, to publicly-traded company, to eventually being acquired by current owner Microsoft. That acquisition price tag ($26.2B at the end of 2016) looks a lot better in retrospect than it did at the time: LinkedIn’s 2019 revenue hit $6.8B, a nearly 3x jump above their 2017 revenue of $2.3B.
Many of the people who work in the SOMA district of San Francisco recognize LinkedIn’s ominous black building on Second Street. When I worked down there, I would sometimes see people take selfies in front of the building. It was, let’s just say, a little odd.
LinkedIn has kept its nose relatively clean compared to the parade of scandals that have followed other social networks. While there hasn’t been a total lack of controversy during Weiner’s time at the helm, it’s been relatively smooth sailing.
I say happy trails only semi-seriously, though. Weiner will likely be a very active executive chairman, and I look forward to seeing what he’ll do to, as he says in his post, “create economic opportunity for every member of the global workforce and closing the Network Gap.”
And finally, we’re talking dips and not about dips for your next Super Bowl party.
Stories about workforce productivity always surround the Super Bowl. It’s an easy story about slacking employees on the company dime and absenteeism. Kronos’ Workforce Institute does one of the better surveys, asking actual people whether they’ll be heading to work the day after the big game. This year, the Workforce Institute estimated based on their survey that 17.5 million people were going to take off the day after the Super Bowl, with most of those people getting preapproval.
Outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas estimated that the Super Bowl would cost organizations $5.1B in lost productivity. The economic impact on work is an interesting thought exercise, but the firm shared the methodology, and it is, in the most literal sense of the word, an estimate. The number was reached partially on the Department of Labor figures, Workforce Institute figures, and guesses about how much time the average worker spends talking about the Super Bowl.
So, I decided to do some research with my own Twitter followers and found that about seven in 10 respondents believed the day after the Super Bowl was about as productive as any other Monday. That said, I only had 14 respondents.
So it's the day after the Monday after the Super Bowl. Was it as unproductive as all the experts claim it was going to be or just another Monday (or hell, maybe even more productive than the typical Monday)?
— Lance Haun (@thelance) February 4, 2020
In all seriousness, even Andrew Challenger, Vice President of Challenger, Gray & Christmas said, “Consumer spending around the Super Bowl, including snacks, drinks, party favors, and fan clothing, will help the economy more than the workers who spend part of their day or the entire day Monday discussing and recovering from the game will hurt it.”
Planned absences aren’t a significant source of economic pain unless you plan on people not using all of their paid time off. And the ten minutes that people are using to discuss the Super Bowl? They’d probably use that time to talk about something else. When stories like this pop up for March Madness, I hope we’ll remember that too.