When a company advertises a position, they are essentially painting a picture of what the future could look like for the candidates they are trying to attract. More often than not, that picture isn’t a pretty one, and when you put that up against a more skillfully crafted picture, side-by-side, the differences become very apparent.
In a study we conducted, we asked job seekers to which of these two types of job postings they’d be more likely to apply to:
Over 95 percent of those surveyed responded that that’d be more likely to respond to Example B, than Example A.
So, why are so many who are recruiting doing so in a way that deters job seekers? And if you are a part of the 85 percent who are recruiting in this manner, how can you painlessly turn your own version of Example A into Example B?
What is it costing you and your company, if some of the best candidates are not applying to you, because your ad copy did not motivate them to do so?
What is it costing you and your company if positions are not filled as quickly as they could be?
What is it costing you and your company if you offer a poor customer experience, and your brand image suffers due to the “ghastly advertising” that Liz Miller talks about in “Dear CMO: Your Recruiting Is Killing Your Brand”?
There are many factors (or as we like to call them, “excuses”) that may be to blame for holding Example A recruiters back from improving. Here are just a few that we have heard:
Not a single factor mentioned above is set in stone. All of those hurdles can easily be overcome, and there are some very convincing reasons as to why they should be. By becoming an Example B recruiter, you can:
Getting from Example A to Example B isn’t that difficult, if you know what to do. So, how do you do it? It’s simple: let the B in Example B stand for “better”, and let that be a reminder to you as to how you improve. Here are some ideas for how you can better your online recruitment content: