As organizations work hard to lower turnover rates, it is wise to take a look at some of the causes of turnover, and at some of the reasons that actions are far more important in keeping people than speeches and promises. I often hear managers, CEOs, and supervisors promising this and that and making speeches about how committed they are to their workers. But when it comes time to allow workers some say in their work, or the opportunity to transfer to another department, or the chance to try something new, they just as often hesitate. Words can take on many meanings and can be twisted to fit any occasion. Actions speak for themselves. Back in the ?good old days? turnover levels were very low in most organizations, often approaching less than 2% in firms like Hewlett-Packard and IBM. Employees expected to be retained until retirement and to receive a living retirement income after 25 or 30 years of service. There was loyalty and commitment to the firm, and in the best of these companies, strong cultures matured. These cultures provided an unwritten behavioral guide and a sense of pride and friendship. People were proud to be knows as an IBMer, for example, because it was like being part of an exclusive club. Their friends who were not IBMers were jealous. But somewhere in the early 1980s things began to change. The first crack came with the advent of the 401(k) and (b) plans that freed employees from corporate retirement programs. The 401 programs are, in effect, portable pensions. In effect, you take your accumulated savings and add to them somewhere else. Silicon Valley companies had never set up pension programs because the young companies there, with non-union workers, did not feel any need to establish retirement programs. So they were the first to feel the impact of 401 programs as workers started understanding what they were all about. Later the downsizing and re-engineering movements began reducing the workforce and began to crack the idea that a company would take care of you until you were ready to retire. Thousands found themselves on the street with no jobs and no retirement benefits. Loyalty crumbled and the idea of staying with an employer for decades became less attractive. In fact, for many young people the idea of working for a single employer for some long period of time is frightening and is seen as career limiting. How times change! Now as we enter a couple of decades where it will be very hard to find good people and even harder to keep them, we have corporations interested in keeping people for long periods of time. I think they will have a tough time of convincing people to stay. They have little in the way of incentives to offer. Benefits are increasingly the same, pensions are all portable (even the big companies have moved to cash balance plans which are essentially portable pensions), and there is almost no negative stigma to having frequently changed jobs. In fact, changes that make sense are considered a plus, as they mean the employee has added experience and competitive knowledge. <*SPONSORMESSAGE*> So how do you make it more attractive to keep employees? Here are a few ideas, but they come with a warning. It requires a committed management team and a lot of new thinking to make these really work.
This is the only way we will reduce turnover and develop a workforce that is energized and productive. Look at firms like Cisco, Yahoo, e-Bay, Charles Schwab: they all actively practice the principles I have outlined above, and all are winners.
