LinkedIn is fascinating but frustrating. Is it just the world’s biggest pile of professional resumes or something more? Is being a publishing platform and learning site central to its future or secondary? LinkedIn sure is useful for now, but where is its future?
One thing that LinkedIn hopes is part of its future is the on-demand economy. With ProFinder, it becomes a talent platform for finding free agents. ProFinder is up against the likes of MBA & Company, Sparehire, Upwork, Twago and Freelancer.com. Can LinkedIn succeed as a talent platform? I’m not so sure.
There are three elements that make for a great talent platform:
LinkedIn has the third element nailed. They’ve got an automatic community because everyone is on LinkedIn, even if they are completely unaware of ProFinder. It’s the other two elements that are troubling.
To match talent to work LinkedIn has resumes — that’s not a high quality source of data. For a programmer you’d rather see code; for designers, work samples; for retail workers, certifications. As long as LinkedIn’s big asset is resumes, it risks being beaten out by talent platforms that have better information for providing a match.
For managing the workflow, I’m sure LinkedIn’s ProFinder will work hard at providing the kinds of administrative features that a site like Upwork offers; but the pure talent platforms will be heartily motivated to stay one step ahead. Furthermore, there seems little chance ProFinder will ever build workflow processes that compete with specialized talent platforms such as Tongal which live and breathe the video production space.
I’m happy to see more players in the talent platform space, but LinkedIn will have to devote a lot of intelligence to ProFinder if it hopes to be competitive.