More than 80 years before Dr. Spencer Johnson’s allegory, Who Moved My Cheese? An Amazing Way to Deal with Change in Your Work and in Your Life, became an instant New York Times business bestseller, Woodrow Wilson summed up our inherent struggles with change more succinctly: “If you want to make enemies, try to change something.”
Why do humans react so strongly to change? Mostly it’s because change causes two things we don’t like: uncertainty and stress. While our default reaction may be to resist change, we know that when certain practices and approaches are applied to the management of change, both the overall experience and associated outcomes are vastly improved.
This holds true for organizations undergoing enterprise software implementations, specifically HR technologies that impact current and prospective employees. Given the hyper-growth in tools and technologies that support talent acquisition and management — such as applicant tracking systems and talent CRMs — many TA and recruiting teams currently have a large-scale software implementation underway or are planning for one. But selecting quality technology is just the beginning; ROI is reliant upon the proper use and planned adoption of the system. Change-management practices can aid you tremendously in this regard.
Our change-management experience teaches us that better outcomes are realized when there’s strong and visible leadership for the target project, coupled with employee involvement across all key phases of the deployment. Change is also more effective when projects are rooted in a detailed scope with clear roles and responsibilities defined for all team members. And, of course, there must be effective communications throughout the entire change process, including critical feedback loops.
Within the premise outlined above are a vast number of practices leaders can apply to the three segments of an implementation: before, during, and after. However, there are several practices that are most essential to a seamless implementation and long-term success.
Most organizations start by assembling an implementation team and assigning tasks, but then fail to establish clear goals, roles, and responsibilities that are data-driven. Would you let a homebuilder show up and start building your new home without first signing off on the detailed architectural drawings? Unless you want to live in a “Winchester Mystery-styled” house, the answer is “no.” You’ve already invested significant time in defining a need for a new system, building your business case, and selecting a vendor. Keep that momentum going and get more ROI by not leaving things to chance. Two change-management approaches that will help you avoid figuring-it-out-as-you-go include:
Implementations are about folding pre-defined processes and goals into the application through configuration, so a significant amount of the work happening during the project will be devoted to tracking how the application supports those processes and what they “look and feel like” in the system. Two things to pay attention to as this occurs are:
While it’s tempting to view the go-live switch for your system as the finish line, there’s still work that must take place post-implementation in order to ensure effective change across the entire organization. Among the most critical steps:
In addition to the practices above, the most significant thing to remember is that change is not a one-and-done process. Viewing your new technology platform as a tool that you should work to continuously improve will further support an effective roll-out, keeping your teams actively engaged in adopting — and advancing — their new talent ecosystem.