Ann Bares (editor of Compensation Café and contributor to TLNT), published a very good post here yesterday on discretionary rewards.
The article focused primarily on the unintended consequences of leaving these discretionary reward budgets solely in the hands of the manager – to which I say, “Hear, hear!”
Ann used a couple of illustrations to highlight the challenges of such programs, which boil down to:
If our goal instead is to empower all employees to delight each other, the customer and the manager, then it is necessary to also empower all employees to recognize and reward each other for demonstrating behaviors and achieving goals aligned with the company’s core values and strategic objectives.
How does empowering all employees impact the challenges referenced by Ann and enumerated above?
Joe may not realize just how exceptional that effort was or that delivering that kind of effort more regularly is desired. If he’d been recognized in the moment, he would know beyond a doubt how much that exceptional effort is appreciated by others and the impact it had on success. Now he’s far more motivated and likely to repeat those behaviors and efforts again and again.
In her post, Ann used the example of a basketball game in which there is no scoreboard and no one is permitted to tell players the score during the game. Only the coach knows. That scenario is just as ridiculous as attending a basketball game where all players are silent. I’ve certainly never seen a sporting event in which the players themselves weren’t encouraging each other constantly.
Who controls the distribution of discretionary recognition and rewards in your organization? Just managers/leaders or all employees?
This was originally published at the Compensation Café blog, where you can find a daily dose of caffeinated conversation on everything compensation.