I’ve led talent acquisition teams for over 20 years in three industries: banking/financial, high tech, and healthcare, and before that I dabbled in recruiting as an HR generalist. For the past one and a half years I went to the dark side when I joined the executive search world, or so I thought before I took the plunge. What the last couple of years has taught me is that I had things backwards when it comes to deciding whether a search firm should be engaged.
The rest of this article will help define what I mean. I know what you are thinking … is this just another self-serving article about the search industry?
As a leader of talent acquisition teams, I felt it was my responsibility to do what I termed “search avoidance.” I even had a search cost-avoidance metric that looked like the one pictured.
I most often found that I was saving the company money … or was I? I would never consider using a search firm until the internal staffing team was not able to source and secure the talent that our internal customers needed. I usually used a metric of total days open to gauge when we were “getting in trouble” or would determine that we didn’t have the skill set to do the work.
As I’ve thought through that approach, I realized that it was totally backwards! What is ultimately important is whether the actions you take will get the results expected. Here are a few questions you should consider asking early in the engagement process with the internal client:
What I think you will find is that you will be perceived by your internal clients as adding value to your team and your organization. Don’t get me wrong — you must continue to be diligent about spending money wisely. But it may be time to do what Dr. Covey suggested quite a few years ago. When it comes to the use of a search firm “begin with the end in mind.”
I welcome any comments or thoughts about this approach or lessons you’ve learned that I might share in the future.