Register today and save big on ERE Expo 2009 Spring in San Diego, March 30 - April 1!

global RSS feed Tag: global

What Recruiting Will Look Like After the Recession

by
Kevin Wheeler
Nov 6, 2008, 6:00 am ET

This is a strange recession.

It is not affecting employment across the board as many of the past ones have, but rather seems to be targeting specific sectors and types of work. Obviously banking and financial services, but also manufacturing and anyone in a semi-skilled job such as auto workers are especially affected. Needs are pocketed and specific. Talent shortages remain.

Yet, I have had calls from search firms looking for key sales and marketing people, and for R&D talent. Senior HR executives are in demand, especially if they have global experience. Sectors still largely unscathed by the recession – healthcare, gaming, entertainment, pharmaceuticals, and biotech – are still facing talent shortages and global competition.

The growth of global supply chains, increasing automation, and greater process efficiency means we can do more with fewer. New jobs are being created daily, but they all require education and skill beyond that of many current candidates.

This, combined with the different attitudes candidates and employees have about work and about how they live their lives, changes how we recruit and employ people.

keep reading…

Recruiting in Russia

by
David Creelman
Oct 8, 2008, 3:17 pm ET

One lesson recruiters must learn is that as soon as they are recruiting in a foreign country they need to play by a new set of rules. The trick is in learning which rules are different and which remain the same.

Russia’s unique culture is — perhaps surprisingly — not such a big issue in recruiting there. In the U.S. we tend to think of Russia as a very foreign place, yet Moscow is in Europe and culturally is not so dramatically different from Western Europe. According to Julia Repryntseva, compensation & benefits and talent director for Alcoa Russia (a company profiled in depth in the Journal of Corporate Recruiting Leadership), the cultural differences between Russia and Western Europe are no larger than those between, for example, Germany and the UK.

What might be a bigger surprise are the enormous differences in compensation between Moscow and the outlying areas. In the U.S. we expect salaries in the big cities to be higher than in rural areas, but managing regional salary differences is mainly a matter of fine-tuning. In Russia, pay levels in a village may be less than half what is paid in Moscow. Recruiters need to be very aware that the location of the job and the place the applicant is coming from will have a huge impact on what makes for an attractive starting salary.

As in the U.S., job boards are important for sourcing, although rather than Monster and CareerBuilder, the big boards in Russia are Headhunter and Jobs.ru. What is surprising is that it’s hard to find engineers using these job boards. Engineers typically work in the plants, not offices, and as a result are not as plugged into the Internet as we would expect. Other sourcing methods, such as newspaper ads, are needed to reach engineering applicants.

It’s hard to predict how recruiting in a foreign market will differ from recruiting in your home country. The key is to recognize that basic assumptions (such as that all engineers will be Internet-savvy) may prove false in other markets. Going in with an open mind and speaking to people with experience on the ground is essential for successful recruiting outside the U.S.

Global Recruitment: A Primer from a Recruiter

by
Shailendra Jaisingha
Sep 19, 2008, 5:42 am ET

Things are starting to slow down for hiring departments across the country for reasons related to the slower economy, arrival of the holiday season, and ending of the year. While things are cooling off across the country, a different breed of recruiters are gearing up to embark on a journey outside the boundaries of this country. While many of them are still working to fill position within the U.S., there are some who are proactively warming up for a long haul to fill the positions far in the future.

I am pointing toward the USCIS (United States Citizenship and Immigration Bureau; erstwhile INS) H-1B quota for the year 2009 that will open its doors to applicants from around the world in April 2009. Every year, USCIS allows and issues 85,000 H-1B visas, out of which only 65,000 visas go to candidates with specialty skills across the world. The rest of the 20,000 visas are available for foreign candidates with higher degrees from schools in the United States, which is generally a master’s degree or higher. Most of the 65,000 H1-B visas go to hi-tech workers across the world whose technical skills in the field of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics are in high demand in the U.S. and Europe.

And so for companies and businesses dealing in the hi-tech industry, an opportunity to recruit professionals from this pool of qualified candidates is strategically important for growth, sustainment, and development of new products and services.

Although principles of recruiting remain the same, it takes a very different approach to recruit candidates from outside the country. Below are some of the pointers that recruiters must keep in mind to successfully recruit these professionals from outside the country. These points are a result of being tested as a recruiter in the global talent pool.

keep reading…

The Challenges of Cultural Difference: 5 Tips on Cross-Cultural Recruiting

by
Kevin Wheeler
Sep 11, 2008, 6:35 am ET

“Sumak was a dream candidate. He graduated from MIT with a Masters degree in electrical engineering. He had 3 years of experience working for a large defense and commercial electronics firm, and he was willing to relocate. But he insisted on sending me resumes filled with photographs of his family. He even sent me some currency from his home country because I had mentioned that I thought it colorful.  He told me and the potential hiring manager all about his family connections back home and how those might be useful to us, and when he learned that I was single, he insisted that I at some point meet his sister! I was actually afraid to recommend him for fear I would be in trouble.”  - Senior Recruiter, large defense contractor

“Rapinee was sure she would be offered the position we had open because she had the highest GPA possible from her home university, which was rated the best in her country.  She also came from a titled family and her father was a very important businessman with government connections. She was reluctant to interview at all and answered my questions in a superficial manner. She thought she should just be offered the position!  I was so angry (although I did not show it) that I immediately decided not to pass her excellent resume on.”   - Director of Technical Recruiting, Semiconductor firm

These two vignettes illustrate issues that can arise when recruiting someone from another culture. While most North American recruiters have a basic understanding that people are different, most assume that the person being interviewed has been “westernized” and knows our operating principles.

It is usually a shock when either overt or subtle behaviors begin to show how different our cultures can be. Even recruiters who have lived abroad and have experienced other cultures are often caught off guard by the actions of candidates who seem very much like us and have excellent academic and experiential credentials.

I teach courses in cultural competency and have lived and traveled extensively in other countries for half of my life. I speak other languages and I am married to someone from another culture. Still, it is often surprising how often I react in negative or positive ways to the cultural differences that are increasingly part of our life.

Those of us who are in urban, coastal areas work with people from other cultures on a daily basis and are often deluded into thinking we are cultural experts. Yet, we get surprised as much as anyone else. As organizations expand their recruiting to other countries and as different cultures mix, being culturally competent is critical to recruiters’ success.

North American recruiters tend to operate under a number of assumptions and unspoken rules. Here is an incomplete sampling of some of them:

  • Interviews are more or less formal affairs and exchanging personal information or getting “chatty” is frowned upon as unprofessional.
  • Degrees are only important for a short time after graduation. By the time someone has been out of school for 3 years or so, the kind of work they are doing and where they are working plays a greater role in deciding who to hire.
  • Where someone went to school, where they are from geographically, and who their parents are plays little role in selection.
  • Family is not discussed during the recruiting process except in a general and superficial manner.
  • The fact that a candidate has been a favorite of the boss or that s/he has received special praise or recognition internally is either frowned upon or of minor importance.

However, each of these may be deemed very important to those from other cultures. Many cultures place great importance on family connections, titles, and schools. Bringing these up in the interview is expected and necessary in order to gain the favor of the recruiter.

Anthropologists divide cultures broadly into those that are collectivist and those that individualistic.

Collectivist cultures are family- and group-oriented. We in North America are brought up in a very individualist culture where accomplishing things independently of others is considered a virtue.

However, in collectivist cultures, such as those in most of Asia, the opposite is true. So showing your commitment to the family and the group is important to them.

keep reading…

13 Trends In Corporate Recruiting for 2009

by
Dr. John Sullivan
Aug 4, 2008, 6:18 am ET

A significant part of my work involves giving presentations around the world on the hottest recruiting topics. It is an aspect of my work that I truly enjoy because it affords me an opportunity to continuously learn about where our profession is headed.

Through speaking, I not only help companies understand the latest recruiting trends, but I also learn from hundreds of professionals about what they see as hot topics, emerging trends, and how they are approaching them. I wanted to take this opportunity to share my thoughts on what recruiting trends will top the agendas of Global 500 recruiting managers in the next 12 to 18 months based on my interaction with more than 300 organizations around the globe this year.

The Latest Trends in Corporate Recruiting

Based on conversations with recruiting leaders, questions asked during seminars, advisory requests, and best-practice research, expect to see an increased emphasis in:

  • Upgrading employment branding. Nothing is hotter around the globe in recruiting than employment branding. Firms throughout Asia, in particular, are increasingly adopting employment branding as a wildly important activity for 2009. The success of Google, a firm that has built the world’s strongest employment brand over an amazing five-year period, has led others to focus on this impactful long-term strategy. Key focus areas include increasing media coverage, increasing visibility online, building your “green” brand, and countering your “negative” employment brand. Firms to watch: Facebook, Google, Yum Brands, Tata, E&Y, Enterprise, U.S. Army, and Sodexo.
  • Reinvigorating referral programs. Despite the growth of career-related Internet sites, the highest volume and quality candidates still come from well-designed employee referral programs. While heavy adoption was initially hampered by cultural issues around the world, today such programs are proving highly effective everywhere. Key focus areas include proactively approaching key employees for referrals (program targeting), leverage non-employee referrals, making reward systems more comprehensive, immediate, and visible, and last but not least, helping employees leverage social media to restore relationships, make new relationships, and build stronger relationships. Firms to watch: AmTrust Bank, Edward Jones, Whirlpool, and Amazon.com.
  • Renewing the focus on quality of hire. As a result of strong research by organizations like staffing.org, recruiting leadership has begun to refocus its efforts on identifying factors that increase the quality or the on-the-job performance of new hires. Key focus areas include improved quality of hire metrics, calculating the performance differential between average and quality hires, and identifying sources that produce high-quality hires. Firms to watch: Aimco and Wipro.
  • Reinforcing the business case for recruiting. As budgets tighten and slow economic growth continues, recruiting budgets will face constant constraints. Instead of whining, many leading talent organizations are seizing the opportunity to reposition themselves as non-transactional organizations. When the focus in recruiting is placed on non-transactional, more systemic issues, such organizations can work with the CFO and risk management to demonstrate the importance of supporting recruiting even during times of reduced hiring volume. The key focus areas include predictive modeling, dollarizing recruiting results, and showing the dollar impact of vacancies in revenue generating positions. Firms to watch: Aimco, DFS, Wipro, and Google.

keep reading…

The 20 Principles of Strategic Recruiting

by
Dr. John Sullivan
Jul 7, 2008, 4:06 am ET

Corporate recruiting is an interesting field. There are no books entitled The Theory of Recruiting or Principles of Strategic Recruiting. As a result, most individuals in recruiting tend to make it up as they go rather than follow a more defined set of rules or principles.

There is no formal body in recruiting that “codifies” the established practices. In this article, I am attempting to help resolve that problem by compiling a list (from my 35-plus years of experience in the field) that can serve as a foundation for your actions.

Of course, principles are guidelines to point you in the right direction. Remember to vary your direction depending on your business situation and global location.

20 Principles of Recruiting and Talent Management

The following is a list of 20 principles, laws, or guidelines to help you design and implement effective recruiting strategies and approaches:

  1. A well-defined strategy. The foundation of any recruiting effort is a clearly defined and communicated strategy that illustrates the brand message, target candidates, primary sources, and most-effective closing approaches (the who, what, when, and how). Poorly defined or communicated strategy elements results in wasted resources and weak hires. In addition, the best strategies have the capability of “shifting” as the economy and the demand for candidates change.
  2. Pipeline approach. The most effective recruiting approach is to build a steady stream of applicants (a pipeline). In order to build a continuous “talent pipeline,” use a “pre-need” approach that includes workforce planning, branding, continuous sourcing, and onboarding.
  3. Competitive. The most effective recruiting approaches are compared against and are clearly superior to those of a firm’s talent competitors. Because competitors will quickly copy your most effective approaches, a continuous side-by-side assessment of “yours versus theirs” is necessary. A sub-principle applies to candidates: because the very best are always in high demand, if you don’t have to literally “fight” for a candidate, in most cases, you do not have the best candidate in the field.
  4. Employment branding. The approach with the highest impact and the only long-term recruiting strategy is employment branding, the process of building your external image as an excellent place to work. By proactively making it easy for potential applicants to read, hear, or see the factors that make working at your firm exciting, you can dramatically increase the number and quality of your applicants over a long period.
  5. Global. For jobs that require top talent, the process must have a global recruiting capability. This is because the very best talent is unlikely to live within commuting distance of your job.
  6. Target employed “non-lookers.” The best recruiting processes are designed to identify and successfully hire currently employed top performers. This means that the process needs the capability of identifying and convincing employed individuals who work at your competitors and may not be actively looking for a position. Unfortunately, most corporate recruiting approaches are designed to attract “active” candidates.
  7. Speed. Making fast hiring decisions is essential whenever a candidate in high demand decides to make a job switch. Top candidates must be hired using “their” decision timetable. Research shows that top candidates are off the market in less than half of the normal corporate time to fill.
  8. Sourcing is critical. If you don’t utilize sources that attract a high percentage of top performers, it is unlikely you will make a quality hire. After employment branding, effective sourcing is the most critical element of the recruiting process. Generally, the most effective source is employee referrals. Other effective but under-used sources include recruiting at professional events and contests. Using ineffective sources means that you must spend inordinate amounts of time and money on candidate screening in order to avoid a weak hire. The source that is used must be shift, depending on the type of candidate required for that position. Unfortunately, many recruiters use the same exact sourcing scheme for every job.
  9. Data-based decisions. Base decisions on sources, screening tools, and which individual to hire on facts and data, not emotion or even common practices. Making decisions based on objective data helps eliminate biases and causes the recruiting process to produce more consistent, reliable, and high-quality results. It’s also true that in a fast-changing world, “what works” changes quickly so recruiting practices become obsolete quickly. Unfortunately, rather than being a small part of recruiting decisions, emotions and “it’s the way we’ve always done it” tend to dominate corporate decision-making.
  10. Build a recruiting culture. The most effective approaches build a corporate-wide “cultural of recruiting” where every manager and employee is a recruiter. Because of their continuous contact and interaction with outside talent, everyone must play an important supplemental role in identifying talent and in spreading the employment brand. The most effective recruiting strategies convince employees to be 24/7 talent scouts, making every employee a recruiter.
  11. A candidate-centric approach. Focus the process on the candidate’s needs, their job selection criteria, and the candidate experience. A significant part of recruiting is “selling” the candidate on applying for and accepting the job. At least in part, recruiting must follow the customer relationship management (CRM) and the sales and marketing models. Often, the number-one reason why candidates reject job offers is the way that they were treated during the hiring process. It’s also important to note that candidates may be current or future customers, so treating them poorly can directly impact future revenue.
  12. Prioritize jobs and targets. Effective recruiting processes maximize resource utilization by identifying and focusing on the positions with the highest business impact. That generally means revenue-producing and revenue-impact jobs, as well as jobs in high margin and rapid growth business units. The process should also target high-impact individuals known as top performers, innovators, and gamechangers.
  13. Managers are the delivery system. Although corporate recruiting designs the process, managers “deliver” and execute a significant part of that process. As a result, hiring managers must understand its elements and support its precise execution. You must effectively demonstrate to individual hiring managers that they will suffer whenever a bad or “butts in chairs” hire is made. Therefore, recruiting must make a strong business case to individual hiring managers that convinces them of the importance of executing the process precisely. The most effective way of influencing hiring managers is by converting recruiting results into their dollar impact on that individual manager’s revenue and profit.
  14. Diversity. An effective recruiting process must include enough variation and personalization to meet the unique needs of diverse individuals from around the world. Diversity and inclusiveness are becoming not just legal terms but critical components in building global sales.
  15. Selling applicants. The very best recruiting processes builds “relationships” with potential applicants over time in order to increase their level of trust and interest. Unfortunately, no amount of benefits or job features will be convincing to high-demand applicants without this level of trust. Because all candidate-screening processes have flaws, stretching out the assessment process over time allows you to learn more about the candidate and decrease the chances of making a bad hire. The best approaches are designed to take advantage of the fact that a target candidate’s willingness to consider a new job changes quite rapidly, as a result of changes in their own job and organization.
  16. Technology. The best processes rely heavily on technology and the Web in all aspects of the recruiting process. Technology can improve screening, increased hiring speed, cut costs, and provide the firm with the capability of hiring globally.
  17. Integration. Recruiting processes must be integrated with other HR processes. Those recruiting processes that operate independently rather than in unison with other HR functions like relocation and compensation will produce diminished results.
  18. Talent shortages. Although industries often face talent shortages, individual firms can actually have a surplus of candidates if they have a strong employment brand, a great referral program, and a candidate-friendly hiring approach. For example, handsome movie stars seldom have difficulty getting “dates” even when the average “Joe” can’t find a single one. Talent shortages are relative and depend on your image and what you have to offer.
  19. Remote work options. Offering candidates remote work options dramatically increases the candidate pool. Firms that have the capability of managing candidates who work from remote locations have a distinct competitive advantage. They can attract the top performer who doesn’t live in the area, who desires working at home, or who isn’t willing to make a long commute.
  20. Metrics and rewards impact recruiting. Every aspect of recruiting improves dramatically when managers and employees are measured, recognized, and rewarded for their contribution to recruiting. By convincing senior management and HR to place metrics and rewards on key aspects of recruiting, you send a clear message about its importance.

Final Thoughts

Almost every business function has come to realize that if you want consistency and excellent results, you must clearly define the rules of the game. There are, of course, exceptions and perhaps even additions that can be made to the principles outlined above.

But, after working with recruiters and recruiting managers from hundreds of companies, I found that these guidelines will give you a pretty good idea of the essential laws of recruiting and where to focus your efforts if you want superior recruiting results.

A Losing Proposition

by
Elaine Rigoli
Jul 1, 2008, 9:57 am ET

Cutting payroll is the wrong way to compete in the global economy, according to a researcher with the United States Business & Industry Council, a Washington-based advocacy group.

Alan Tonelson, who represents small- and medium-sized manufacturers, called this “ultimately a losing proposition” and feels that no amount of labor-saving technology can offset the low wages, huge pools of workers, and lower overall capital costs in China, India, and some Third World nations.

In his book, Race to the Bottom, he writes that the United States “will never be able to compete with them simply by cost-cutting.”

keep reading…

Six Things You Can Do to Attract Global Candidates

by
Laura Randell
Apr 3, 2007

There’s a largely untapped source of talented Americans working overseas. Many of these expatriates are keen to return home but find it difficult to get a lucrative assignment within the same organization. That makes them excellent targets for recruiters who are willing to think creatively about sourcing overseas.

Non-national expatriates (non-U.S. citizens) can also be a superb source of global talent to tap into because of the unique skills and experience they can bring. It’s worth exploring their unique circumstances to determine whether your firm can assist great candidates in obtaining visas.

keep reading…

A Thirst for Talent in Africa

by
Elaine Rigoli
Nov 9, 2006, 2:13 pm ET

As part of its “manifesto for growth” across the entire African region, the admittedly conservative Coca Cola Company says it looked into a new business plan with fresh ideas to promote effective employee development.

Part of the challenge for the world’s largest non-alcoholic beverage company was determining how to transform and grow its service delivery model consistently, from Cairo to Johannesburg, and everywhere in between.

“We wanted a quick, low-cost implementation, simple design, and ease of use,” says Valerie Kennerson, director of strategic talent sourcing and selection. “We needed sustained administration and accessibility across the entire continent.”

So earlier this year, the company chose to implement a new recruiting-technology system in its Coca-Cola Africa human resources functions. It also established the Coca-Cola Africa talent acquisition group in the company’s newly created Center of Excellence.

keep reading…

College Recruiting 2010, Part 1

by
Kevin Wheeler
Mar 8, 2006

Generation Y, or the “Millenniums” as they are called, will change the way almost all recruiting takes place. These are the people born from around 1980 onward, who make up close to 25% of the current and potential workforce. Only the Baby Boomers were more numerous and more influential, and they are in the waning years of workplace importance. The new rules on how, where, and when work gets done ó and who does it ó will emerge from the technical and cultural experiences and beliefs of Gen Y. Technology is core to understanding this generation. They are technically savvy and connected, and they work virtually much of the time.

Almost 100% of today’s college students own a cell phone and, according to a study by YouthKnowhow, almost 82% of 15-19-year-old youths have cell phones. A recent Pew study indicates that 82% of those 18-29 go online to get their primary news updates, and cable television reaches almost all of those under 25 years old and most of those between 25 and 40. They do not read much, unless it is online and part of a website or an email. Most books are purchased by Baby Boomers and the most electronic bytes are purchased by Gen Y. Face-to-face interaction is less and less important to them for social events, for education, and for having fun. The electronic gamming industry has grown significantly over the paste decade and games get more realistic and more complex every year. There are students who date virtually and take part in gamming parties without ever being in physical contact.

Culturally, the Gen Yers are also a diverse group. In the southwestern and western United States, youths of Hispanic and Asian backgrounds are at a majority or close to it. African Americans are returning to the south and reasserting their own culture and traditions. Media, movies, and travel all reinforce the diverse understanding and tolerance this generation has for a variety of experiences. They are looking for adventure and excitement, but it can be offered virtually. All of these trends are slowly exerting their power on recruiting college students to corporate America. By the year 2010, these forces of technology, culture, and demographics will have transformed traditional college recruiting and will have caused it to re-examine what it does and why and how it does it. Here is Part 1 of a two-part article on some of what we may begin seeing.

Recruiting Virtually All the Time

Recruiting will take place all the time, rather than at certain specified times and places set by university administrators and corporate recruiting directors. Specified times for information session and interview schedules will have little or no importance or relevance to students. They are used to having information available on a website all the time. Most professors post homework, example problems, sample tests and often collect and grade the homework all electronically. I ask my own students to submit their homework to be via email and I grade it and return it the same way. All my lecture notes are online along with my PowerPoint slides and other materials so any student can get it wherever and wherever they are. Students expect to access in-depth material about your organization, philosophy, and even find out experiences others have had with your organization. Recent graduates and newly hired employees are already starting to contribute to their online alumni chat rooms and blogs their experiences as an employee at your firm. Through email, text messaging and blogs, many recent grads stay in touch with those still at school and give them the inside scoop on how to get employed at your firm, which managers to avoid, what to say and do or they offer up reasons to avoid your firm. The smart organization will have an up-to-date, youth-oriented website for college recruiting and offer a variety if ways to interview, including online and virtual interviews. There will be much less effort and time spent on campus involvement and more with getting students to the website and involved in virtual communication. Next week, I will offer some secrets to a great college website.

Virtual Internships and Co-Op Experiences

These students have been working virtually since high school. They are completely used to working with email, conference calls, with online collaboration tools and with streaming video. Good college recruiting will use these skills to create relationships with the students and recruit them over time. Leading edge firms will provide ways for students to interact with project managers, hiring managers, and functional experts within an organization. Perhaps students will be offered the opportunity to collaborate on a project virtually or take part in conference calls or online discussions about work issues. Students will be hired based on online interviews and assessments, offered internships that are virtual and be involved in work without ever coming to the corporate site or meeting anyone in person. This is a scenario that I have tested with many Baby Boomers and Gen Xs (those between 30-45).

Generally the reaction is negative and comments fly: “You have to see someone in person to really know them.” “You can’t judge without a face-to-face interaction.” “Being at our site is important to success.” And, while I, too, often feel this way, the facts are clear: It is not necessary to see someone face-to-face to have a relationship, to get work done, or to communicate. The Gen Ys have been doing this all of their lives and are quite comfortable with it. We are the ones who need to change and adapt, although I am sure it will be a long and messy process!

Global Outreach: All Schools are “Key”

The world is getting very small and very flat. People anywhere are potentially candidates for any job. Students are studying and working abroad more frequently and, while language is still a barrier, more and more schools and students are comfortable working in English. And, more American students are from diverse backgrounds and speak two or more languages fluently. It is relatively easy to get a work visa in many countries and many are encouraging young people to come and work for a while to ease the labor and skills shortages that are growing. Australia and New Zealand, as well as China, have relatively easy ways for students to work in their countries.

Given technology, there is less reason to confine recruiting to a handful of key schools. The requirements for a job can be redefined around skills and competencies and students can be tested to see whether or not they have those skills and competencies in the amounts required. Through online screening and virtual interviews, any student could be a candidate. The benefits to the organization are increased diversity, greater variety of students with different experiences, and the ability to ferret out even the rarest skills. Next week I will continue this series. I would love to hear from any of you who may be doing something different, virtual, or global with college recruiting. If so please send me an email at kwheeler@glresources.com.

Here in Israel, Global Businesses Are Grabbing Talent in a Huge Wave of Investment

by
Todd Raphael
Mar 7, 2006

Darwin would be fascinated by this place, a land that makes the term “survival of the fittest” too cliche to say. This is the last frontier for Arabs who arrived because in their home countries they were in danger for being gay, for Jews who left Iran a quarter-century ago, and for Ethiopians who have made such death-defying escapes, sometimes on foot, from Africa that their stories read like those Hollywood movies that make you sarcastically say, “Yeah, right.” Immigration here from the Stalinesque dictatorship of Belarus is up sharply. The immigrants are coming to Israel to raise families, sell falafel, plant fruit, design clothing, and drive buses — though in this country, the latter is no run-of-the-mill job.

But it is the small Israeli tech sector that is influential in ways that defy economic gravity, running America on its inventions like voicemail, instant messages, Microsoft operating systems, and Centrinos, as well as ingestible medical cameras that fit inside pills. On the highways here, you see some familiar names that have either set up R&D centers or bought Israeli startups: the Agilents, the Ciscos, the Qualcomms. One billboard advertises a new Oracle project melding HR software from PeopleSoft and Oracle. Google is expanding here too ó partly, it says, because there are so many talented software engineers. Intel is investing $3 to $4 billion in a new Israeli chip plant.

This country is not rich, and nor are most of its people. Actually, it’s tough to find anyone here who appears unusually wealthy. But Google’s recruiters will find a highly educated, highly literate workforce in a politically stable democracy. And, says TheStreet columnist James Altucher, “Despite what you’ve heard in the media, Israel is an extremely safe country.” Danny Yamin, Microsoft Israel’s chief executive, tells me that “over the last two years there has been a huge wave of investment” from venture capitalists around the world and from global high-tech companies doing research here. Companies that specialize in screening and testing potential and current employees are particularly hot.

One of these companies, Redmatch, sells recruiting technology to corporations, staffing firms, and media outlets such as newspapers. Redmatch, among other things, says it hopes to “make the endless stream of resumes disappear” ó well, at least the ones you don’t want. Candidates build profiles based on their skills and experience, such as “10 years running a magazine,” and receive listings of jobs that fit the bill. The reverse happens for employers; they can indicate that, rather than seeing resumes from every candidate who wants their job, they only want to receive job applications, for example, from candidates who have 10 years’ magazine experience and have led a team of at least five people.

Redmatch began by selling mainly to newspapers, and CEO Gal Almog says he has about 650 newspaper clients. He hopes to have 2,000 papers signed on within a year. But he has turned the company into a full-blown applicant tracking system provider. Almog’s telling prospective clients that his product can be customized far more quickly than those of the other applicant tracking companies, and he has recently beat out some big-name American applicant-tracking companies for contracts. Redmatch has signed on Ohio Savings Bank, the publishing company Lee Enterprises, and now boasts 150 corporate clients. Vertical search sites like Oodle and SimplyHired are calling Almog, wanting to partner with him. Between 2004 and 2005, Redmatch revenues jumped 80 percent.

Another firm, HRVision, helps companies around the world select employees. It’s wrapping up a new round of venture capital funding. The directions HRVision gives to its office aren’t those of the typical assessment vendor: “Take the first left toward the Dead Sea.” Its location is actually uniquely Israeli: a high-tech business park near 2,000-year-old catacombs. HRVision has more than 100 clients in Holland, Mexico, Brazil, and elsewhere. At about 100 euros per candidate, it builds profiles of a company’s top performers, and then develops an assessment of job candidates based on those profiles. The company says that because high performers are used as a benchmark, its tests correlate far more closely to job performance than do interviews or most other tests. The tests have four parts: personality, intelligence, integrity, and a fourth which examines the way someone works, such as how they handle stress or how they work with distractions in the background. Kimberly-Clark used the tests to discover that although its forklift drivers shouldn’t be dummies, they shouldn’t be so smart that they spend all day thinking, “I got better things to do than drive this thing around.” A large beverage company used it to better select drivers who aren’t accident prone. Manpower has used HRVision’s tests in recruiting recruiters.

Speaking of Manpower: A few years’ back, two of its executives heard about an Israeli employee screening and assessment company called CareerHarmony. Manpower bought some of CareerHarmony in 2000 and now owns most it. Manpower has a CEO, Stuart Marvin, running the Israeli company out of Geneva. CareerHarmony’s aptitude tests, job simulations, skills tests, and personality tests are used in 14 different languages by companies like FedEx, Wal-Mart, and Singapore Airlines. A giddy Marvin says he has landed a “very, very exciting contract in China,” helping the Shanghai government test people for entrepreneurial skills in order to help decide who gets tax breaks. Marvin hopes to upsell and expand the Shanghai contract. As to how this tiny Israeli company ended up screening more than a half-million employees annually, Marvin points to the intelligence, education level, and technical skills of Israelis, as well as something less tangible. “Their desire to be successful is fabulous,” he says. “My experience in working with the Israelis is second to none.”

CareerHarmony has its roots in knowledge gained from testing people in the Israeli army. That such a powerful military is still needed is a source of frustration for Israelis. When their babies are born, the parents or a midwife often prays that they won’t have to go into the military — but knows the likelihood they will is high. Heavy military spending is not Israel’s only challenge. Despite pro-growth policies implemented by former Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the government owns too much of the Israeli economy. Job-hopping is popular. Inflation is up, as is the gap between rich and poor. Like in America, politicians are often distrusted. Israel also seems incompetent at public relations; a slew of American groups have been founded to complain about the stream of inaccurate stories about the country in the European and American media.

Although HRVision’s Sandy Erez says that “Israelis consider themselves very much Europeans — they have much more in common with Europe,” she notes that “we are still in the Middle East and that does have an influence–but that is truly understating reality.” That the Middle East merely influences Israel is indeed an understatement. One influence is Persia. As noted by the author Edwin Black, this great nation became an outpost for the Gestapo last century, changed its name to Aryan, or Iran, and organized groups of Iranian Nazi volunteers to go to Bosnia and kill Jewish people there. Today, Iran’s spending about $100 million annually to support a paramilitary terrorist group called Hezbollah which has killed Americans, Europeans, and fires rockets at Israelis in the Har Dov neighborhood in Northern Israel. Yuval Diskin, who heads Israel’s security service, is expecting a “new and worrisome wave of terror” to be unleashed soon by Iran, working with local terrorist groups.

But even in a land this tiny, the Har Dov rockets seem far away. Elsewhere in Israel, M.L.L. Haifa is making human resources software; its clients include a division of Coca-Cola. Malam Group is selling employee attendance systems. Doran Communication is designing recruitment ads. Not far from HRVision, ViryaNet sells workforce technology to companies such as Lockheed Martin. The ViryaNet products are used in the field to take orders and schedule a technician based on the technician’s skill, location, and availability. ClickSoftware, a ViryaNet competitor, is also in the workforce planning and forecasting business, using algorithms originally designed for the Air Force.

Yes, work here and life here go on. Marvin, the CEO of CareerHarmony, says that when he flies from Geneva to Israel, as he does about every three weeks, he feels safer than in other cities “because the security is so good.” Besides, Darwin actually said that it’s not the fittest who survive; it’s those best at adapting. Yamin, the Microsoft Israel chief executive, says, “I think what happens is terror is part of our lives in this area, so we need to learn how to live with it and do all the things we need to do.” Or, as Almog, the CEO of Redmatch says, “Israelis tend to live for the day and not worry about tomorrow.”

Recruiting in Europe, Part 1

by
Dr. John Sullivan
Mar 6, 2006

As the global economy heats up and companies in Union City, Ohio, begin to compete with those in Plovdiv, Bulgaria, it should become painfully obvious that talent has become a global commodity, and that recruiters are becoming the front line traders of the most valuable asset on earth. Those among us who understand the new realities of business know that enabling corporate success means being able to find, attract, assess, and close the best and brightest around the world. Regardless of your intentions — be they to relocate talent or relocate work — it is essential that your recruiting toolkit contain an arsenal of approaches that work outside your backyard.

While much of the buzz these days surrounds Asia, it is important to realize that there are a vast number of European countries that produce highly educated populations and that yield the ever-so-popular wage differential. Turkey for instance has a labor force nearly 25 million workers strong, 64% of whom work in globally viable trades earning wages approximately 86% less than U.S. and UK medians. This article will focus on why emerging firms should look to Turkey (Turkiye for those in Europe) for top talent and provide some insight into the tools and approaches that work there.

Turkey Already a Prime Destination for Leading Firms

Most people around the world know that there is a country named Turkey, but few know much about it. However, if you were to take a college student from Ohio and plop them down on the streets of Istanbul, a lot would look familiar. Starbucks is packed, McDonald’s and Burger King are at war, and tucked between them in buildings several hundred years old are recognizable firms like Intel, Cisco Systems, Citigroup, Deloitte, and countless others. Intel entered Turkey in 1997, and has been working with the universities there to strengthen programs in electrical engineering and computer science, programs that will help grow Turkey’s high tech workforce well beyond its current four million. This might explain why just two weeks ago Gretchen’s JobsBlog at Microsoft brought to our attention that a Microsoft international recruiter (talent scout), Priya, would be combing the winding streets of Istanbul in late April in search of talented software design and test engineers.

Reasons to Consider Turkey

Here are some reasons your firm should consider recruiting talent in Turkey:

  • Located both in Europe and Asia. Turkey is a unique country, in that it is physically located both in Europe and in Asia. Because it straddles the border between the two continents, individuals living in Turkey are quite familiar with business practices in both Europe and Asia.
  • keep reading…

India’s Rise Means a New Dawn for Recruiters

by
Allan Schweyer
Mar 2, 2006

India has the largest English-speaking population in the world, but it’s not just words that connect it to the West. As an emerging world power, India is already facing many of the talent challenges we’ve become accustomed to, but often on a larger scale. Its response will have repercussions on the U.S. talent supply and will forever change the meaning of the “War for Talent.” Indian Americans number more than 2 million and have the second highest income of any ethnic group in America. They are better educated than the average American, accounting for 38 percent of all doctors in the United States, 12 percent of scientists, and 35 percent of Silicon Valley start-ups. They form the largest group of foreign students. In short, they are an important part of our talent pool. And they’re leaving. In the past two years about 5,000 IT workers have repatriated to India, and the trend is accelerating.

According to India-based blogger Gautam Ghosh, there are more than 20,000 recruitment firms in India already. Many Indian recruiters, along with their counterparts in Singapore, Australia, Ireland, and elsewhere, understand that the pursuit of top talent is global. And in many cases, these recruiters have their governments behind them. In India, ongoing global promotions brand the country itself as a great place to work, live, and study. The government of India is working to convince the best of the massive Indian Diaspora to return home ó often appealing to a sense of patriotism and offering opportunities that might be hard to come by even in the United States. While I was in India last month, two world-renowned scientists who had been invited to the United States by American universities became so frustrated with the U.S. immigration procedures that they publicly declared they had no further interest in setting foot in the United States.

A Bigger World for Recruiters

Recruiters had it easy before 1995. Relatively high unemployment and a steady, if small surplus of talent combined with low turnover made it a cushy job. The “War for Talent” between 1995 and 2000 created a new recruiter, far more aggressive, far more technologically savvy and far more connected. After a three- to four-year lull, the game is again changing for recruiters. For a short while, some may get away with a provincial, shortsighted view of talent. But while they’re tapping an ever-decreasing pool of US-based talent, their colleagues and competitors will be nurturing global relationships and building their networks into the farthest reaches of the planet. Needless to say, the latter will ultimately prevail. Having recently returned from a six-day, three-city tour that started in Delhi and ended in Bangalore, I urge recruiting executives to get on the plane and go East.

I traveled with executives from DNL Global, an innovative recruiting firm based in Dallas, that saw the light years ago and has already built an impressive clientele both in India and the United States around the identification and recruitment of globally capable managers. As DNL builds its global talent pools, it will become a “go to” firm for companies desperate for the type of talent and thought leadership that can build bridges and create a competitive advantage in the global workforce. In the best Indian business schools and in the top companies, one seldom hears HR and recruiting discussed in their traditional sense. In a nation that has been the recipient of more HR and recruitment outsourcing business than anywhere else, India’s answer to skill shortages and sky-high attrition rates is an emphasis on talent management. Everywhere I went, organizations were immersed in strategic workforce planning and analytics. They were tying performance management and retention to compensation. Due to high attrition, “talent relationship management” is approached methodically and creatively in many of the business-process-outsourcing call centers I visited. Everywhere, employment-brand building, particularly through heavy investment in employee development, is a cornerstone of workforce initiatives.

On the acquisition front, Indian multinationals are nurturing relationships with talent while in school, building talent pools and enticing overseas workers, particularly those who left India and have built skills in the west. In the business-process-outsourcing call centers, some are reaching into high schools to develop call-center skills so that they will no longer have to rely solely on college graduates for the millions of customer-service positions being created each year. I’m not surprised that the conversations I had with business leaders, human capital consultants, and university professors in Delhi, Ahmedabad, and Bangalore are so similar to those I have in North America. While there remains a massive income, poverty, and infrastructure gap between cities in India and the West, the language of business and human capital management is nearly identical. Human capital professionals and leaders in the West have as much to learn from their counterparts in India as the other way around. I had to learn this for myself, and so should you.

America’s Employer Brand in the Age of Global Recruiting

by
Dave Lefkow
Feb 28, 2006

In the global war for talent, the United States has always been able to rely on our strong appeal as a land of opportunity to attract the best and brightest talent from around the world. With the rise of other economies like China, India, and Singapore, we are seeing increased competition for these resources, and in many ways we may be at a disadvantage. It’s time to start thinking about America’s employer brand and the effect it has on our ability to recruit quality talent.

Whether you recruit in San Diego, California, or Lima, Ohio, you know how important location is in recruiting. It has the potential to be your greatest asset or present your greatest challenges. In order to make a potentially life-changing decision like changing locations, candidates will look at quality of life, cost of living, and the base of other companies and future opportunities available in your area. Where you live has a huge impact on who you can recruit. In the global talent marketplace, the United States has always been seen as the land of opportunity. U.S.-based companies have been able to ride this wave to recruit the best and brightest from around the world. Our leadership position has been particularly strong in math and the sciences: With 5 percent of the world’s population, the United States employs nearly one-third of all scientists and engineers. Half of the Ph.D.’s in the United States are foreign-born. Half of Americans who have won Nobel Prizes in physics and chemistry were born abroad. We are therefore highly reliant on immigration to produce our best and brightest. Yet there is strong evidence that we are losing our lead and that global recruiting is about to get more difficult.

Is America’s Edge Slipping?

If you want a glimpse into the possible future of global recruiting, I would suggest you read two books with somewhat similar sounding names: Flight Capital: The Alarming Exodus of America’s Best and Brightest and The Flight of the Creative Class: The New Global Competition for Talent. These books are great supplements to the equally excellent The World is Flat, by Thomas Friedman, which focuses primarily on the global outsourcing trend and how technology is leveling the playing field in the global marketplace. In the first (and most recent) book, Flight Capital, author David Heenan explores how rising economies in places like China and India are resulting in “boomerang migrations,” or expatriate workers who are returning to their home countries. It stands to reason that workers would prefer to do work in their homelands, close to their families, and within more familiar environments and cultures.

Our increasing globalization and new opportunities in their native lands make this possible. According to Heenan, “on its present course, America’s nation of immigrants will become a nation of emigrants.” In particular, the book focuses on knowledge workers in math and the sciences. If we lost our edge in math and sciences, one might reason that our advantage will always be in American ingenuity and creative thinking. But even this “creative class” is at risk, as author Richard Florida argues in The Flight of the Creative Class. Somewhat controversially, he argues that other governments like Canada, Scandinavia, and New Zealand provide less repressive environments that might be more attractive to creative thinkers — and shows how the loss of even a few creative geniuses could have a significant impact.

Immigration, Emigration, and the Skills Gap

Many of us in the recruiting industry are rightly concerned about the Baby Boomers retiring and the potential for large skills shortages. For decades, immigration has not just been a source of very specialized talent; it has been a magic bullet of sorts for any skills gaps. Without serious shifts in U.S. government strategy and policy, immigration actually has the potential to be more of a problem than a solution over the next several years. Due to security concerns following 9/11, the United States has enacted the tightest immigration laws in recent times, reducing the number of H1-B visas from almost 800,000 in 2000 to approximately 80,000 in 2005. Emigration is also a very real threat, and not just with math and science experts or creative talent. The brain drain of U.S. citizens might reach all the way up to the executive suite. According to a study by the Association of Executive Search Consultants, over 50 percent of U.S. executives surveyed would relocate to China, and approximately 35 percent would go to countries like India or Russia, all of whom would be hungry for the experience these executives have building and operating successful companies here in the United States.

The Government Responds

In the President’s most recent State of the Union address, we heard about an interesting program that lays out a new workforce plan for the United States: the American Competitiveness Initiative. The proposed initiative lays a foundation for increased spending in R&D and education plans designed to help us build rather than continue to acquire our math and science workforce. The program includes:

Highlights From Our 2006 Global Trends Survey

by
Kevin Wheeler
Feb 8, 2006

The idea of a global workforce is just emerging. Most of us still believe and practice the maxim that “all recruiting is local.” For some firms, even recruiting outside their state or county is a rare occurrence, while some of the world’s largest companies have recruited internationally for decades. Over the next decade, most organizations will face the need to look for people beyond their local environments. This is partially because people locally may lack the needed skills or experience, but also just because they can. It is very enticing to hiring managers to think that they can tap into the world’s best talent — no matter where it lives. With the tools we have today — the Internet, referral technologies, email, and so forth, seeking out talent in other places is easier and faster than ever. The Internet has changed most of what we do and it has allowed work to move anywhere. Just a few years ago, the thought of having someone in another country design our products, talk to our customers, provide technical help, read X-rays, or diagnose a disease was unthinkable. Today it is happening regularly. This also means that recruiters usually find themselves facing one of two global recruiting situations:

  1. Recruiting remotely from the home country to find people anywhere and recruit them to the parent organization.
  2. keep reading…

What’s Been, What Will Be

by
Kevin Wheeler
Jan 25, 2006

Last year, I worked in six countries and four continents and found similar challenges and issues in each, although with their own twist, whether a booming economy, a dearth of people, or a lack of technology. This forced me to think differently about a lot of the concerns we hear in the United States. In many ways, our problems are not as severe as we think.

For example, Australia faces significant shortages of skills and people. About 25 percent of Australian workers were born elsewhere (compared to about 12 percent in the United States) and immigration will have to remain very high to grow to sustain the booming Australian economy. At the same time, opportunities in the United States, Europe, and other countries are enticing many Australians to leave, and the educational system is struggling to entice and graduate enough new workers to make up for the number projected to retire. China is also very short of skilled workers. While there are tens of thousands of laborers, only a small fraction have the skills to work in the new factories, high-tech establishments, software firms, call centers, and service industries that are sprouting up. They are educating a record number of people, but they cannot keep up with the growth. The lack of skilled people will almost certainly constrain China’s ability to grow as fast as it wishes to. While we in the United States face the issues of fewer skilled workers and an aging workforce, we can, and will, tap into that aging workforce in many ways. Some will choose to not retire; some will work part-time or as contractors or consultants. Organizations are finding ways to entice older workers to stay and are also focusing more on keeping younger workers. China has none of these older, skilled workers to tap. It will most likely turn to the worldwide Chinese-speaking diaspora for help.

The issues we were asked to help on this past year feel into three areas: 1) market knowledge and awareness, 2) employment branding, and (3) retention. Many clients asked me to help them and their management teams understand how significant the skills shortages are and to analyze the likely number of Baby Boomers who will retire. They were also focused on looking internally and analyzing their current employees’ skills so they could be recruited for new positions. Other clients were focused on building market-oriented strategies to attract better candidates and to attract the “right” candidates. We helped do research in brand perception and awareness and helped clients improve their websites and marketing approaches. Several were concentrating on keeping their current employees, finding which ones had skills that could be used elsewhere in the organization, and on changing policies so that older workers might be inclined to stay a while longer. What will the rest of 2006 bring? We are already seeing an increased focus on selection methods and tools that make it easy to screen for the best candidates. This is being done to lower the amount of time it takes to process potential candidates and to relieve the workload of overworked recruiters. It is also being done to improve the candidate’s experience and provide her with a faster and more accurate response than today. We are seeing a continued interest and commitment to better employment branding and candidate awareness programs. These are being launched in the form of new websites, improved college recruiting strategies, better use of product advertising as a way to do employment branding, and as more publicity aimed at the segments of workers the organizations wish to attract.

The desire to put in place screening and assessment systems is growing rapidly. Almost all of our clients have some program in place to better screen candidates and to provide recruiters with a more qualified candidate than has been the case. Along with these major trends, we also see more time spent on on-boarding new employees and in making sure they have a positive initial experience. We see some increased interest in better and more modern college recruiting, and a huge increase in global recruiting best practices. The results of our survey on global recruiting will be released in a few weeks here on ERE and on my company website.

We also see more Baby Boomers staying in the job market and helping alleviate the current and predicted talent shortages. Art Koff, the founder of RetiredBrains.com, a job board devoted to helping seniors find jobs and to helping organizations find skilled employees, reports record numbers of both seniors (and Boomers), as well as organizations accessing his site. In short, this will be a year when we evolve better approaches to things we are already doing and build more stable and useful systems.

December Is Prime Time for Recruiting

by
Dr. John Sullivan
Nov 28, 2005

Although I have written about this topic before, it never ceases to amaze me when I talk to recruiters and managers how many of them still look at December as “downtime” for recruiting. I frequently hear phrases like, “No one’s in the office,” or, “No one changes jobs during the Christmas season” as excuses. But if you are a smart recruiter or recruiting manager, you will find that December is in fact a great time to recruit, for a variety of reasons. Now, I’m not talking about recruiting those high-volume active job seekers, because they do actually apply for fewer jobs during December. The target here are top performers, who are normally too busy to respond to job offers and recruiter calls. Some of the reasons to gear up recruiting during December include:

  1. Thinking globally requires you to recruit globally. Although many people talk about the importance of global recruiting, only a handful of U.S.-based companies actually practice global recruiting. When you begin to think globally, you realize almost immediately that not every country in the world takes the entire month of December off to shop and attend holiday parties. In fact, in only a handful of countries does Christmas have the same impact on the business world as it does in the U.S. As a result, it’s essential that you continue to recruit in all areas, but especially in the geographic regions where others don’t slow down in December. In particular, focus your recruiting in countries like China, India, the Middle East, Africa, and Australia, which are excellent places to pick up great hires in December.
  2. keep reading…

Poaching the Best Talent Worldwide

by
Dr. John Sullivan
Nov 21, 2005

Few topics in the field of recruiting evoke such strong opinions as the subject of poaching talent, but it is a topic that must be explored further. In the United States, it is clear that a number of corporate recruiters shy away from poaching talent on the grounds that it is unethical to approach and offer possible employment to someone who is already gainfully employed by another organization, such as a direct competitor, despite the fact that the target employee could always just ignore the recruiter’s efforts or opt out at any stage in the process. Given that firms in the United States are typically the most aggressive recruiting organizations, having pillaged other countries for top talent in information technology, healthcare, and the sciences for years, you might assume that the dominant perceptions around poaching talent in the Unites States are similar to those of recruiters abroad. If you did do that, you’d be wrong!

U.S. Perceptions Exist in a Vacuum Two weeks ago, I spoke at ERE’s first European conference, to a crowd of recruiters representing some of Europe’s most recognized companies and a handful of U.S. companies with a strong global footprint. I opted to speak on what I consider the most aggressive recruiting tactic available to corporate recruiters: targeted talent poaching. Prior to arriving in Brussels, Belgium, I prepared for a negative reaction, based on previous experiences with this topic in the U.S. But to my surprise, the reaction wasn’t negative. In fact, one member of the audience spoke up and indicated that poaching had become par for the course, a comment that drew affirmation from the rest of the audience. This caught me by surprise, only because over the years I have worked with a number of European firms, and when compared to firms headquartered elsewhere, their hesitation to adopt aggressive approaches was by far the most resolute I’ve experienced anywhere in the world.

Reflecting on that experience, I realized that it wasn’t out of line with other global experiences I’ve had this year. Throughout 2005, I touched down in eleven countries, mostly in Southeast Asia and Central and Eastern Europe. The perceptions around poaching encountered in Europe could be seen in Australia and New Zealand, where the shortage of skilled talent has threatened the survival of dominant industries. One banking organization was so aggressive that it approached the spouses of targeted candidates while their respective partners were at work to recruit the spouse as a decision influencer. It seems as though the dominant position the U.S. has enjoyed for years in the political/economic landscape has perhaps made our recruiting organizations complacent. As migration to the global economy causes rapid wage inflation in underdeveloped nations such as India, China, and Eastern Europe alongside steady wage deflation in hyper-developed nations like the U.S. and Great Britain, it is clear that such complacency may tip the scales in favor of the developing nations as the war for talent escalates.

A Primer on Poaching

Poaching talent is the practice of proactively targeting and hiring top talent away from a competitor or top firm, with the specific intention of:

  • Securing skills or capabilities faster than if you were to attempt to develop talent internally through training and development efforts
  • keep reading…