MIT researchers gave a group of patients all the same placebo for pain relief, according to the latest Men's Health magazine. Some of the people were told the placebo was an expensive, brand-name medicine. Others were told it was a cheaper generic. Still, all of them were given the same empty pill.
Thirty percent more of the people who thought they were getting an expensive drug said it made them feel better.
It's a phenomenon that works any way you cut it -- if you tell people a hairstyle cost $200, they'll think it's better than if you tell them it cost $20 -- even if in blind trials, they can't tell the difference. The same goes for colleges; Clemson University charged more and people thought the higher price would mean they'd get a better education.
A new study on wine shows similar results. If people are told a wine is more expensive, they'll say it's better than a cheaper wine, but $10 bottles beat out $150 in blind taste tests .
I wonder if this holds true in recruiting:
Do managers and recruiters sometimes think one job candidate is better than another, simply because they're earning more?
Do people assume that someone who went to a higher-priced, more expensive college is somehow smarter than another person who did not? Do employers value, for example, a public education at brainiac New College less than one that costs exponentially higher?
When we hear that one recruiting technology vendor has a more expensive product, is our first thought: "it must be better"? Is this the case with the price of job-board listings?
Most interesting: does taking a job that pays less lead an employer to think someone is less skilled and less valuable than if that job candidate had taken a higher-paid job? In other words, if a math major earns half as much teaching high school math than had she/he gone into private business, and then applies for a job, does a prospective employer think that $50,000 teacher is less smart than the $100,000 math major at an accounting company?
There are currently no trackbacks for this blog posting.
comments
Neuroscience and Decision Making
posted 5/29/2008 at 7:45 a.m. PT by Joshua Letourneau
Todd, you are correct in your statement and question. Perhaps the most notorious study of all were the double-blind taste tests between Coca-Cola and Pepsi in the 80s'. In the double-blind tests, subjects were relatively split on Coke and Pepsi . . . however, when the taste test was subsequently administered non-blind, subjects chose Coke an overwhelming majority of the time.
There have been extensive neuroscience experiments on this subject, notably one a few years ago in which the same Coke-Pepsi taste test was recreated using PET scan in which they measured brain activity. The results were mind-blowing - to not come across as too much of a geek, I won't go further here . . . but highly recommend you checking this out :)
Coke and Pepsi
posted 5/29/2008 at 7:52 a.m. PT by Todd Raphael
This "advice to Brown" mentions it -- http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/daniel_finkelstein/article3882856.ece
Interesting.
The power of suggestion
posted 6/5/2008 at 6:38 a.m. PT by Kevin Grossman
You're definitely onto something and it's certainly applicable to brand as well as price. The generic fast food in McDonald's wrapper experiment.
Please log in to post a comment to this blog. New users, please click here.
more ere blogs 3-O’Clock Coffee Break 3rd Rock A to Z of Health Care Recruiting Ali’s Sourcing Techniques Ask The Recruiter Attract, Retain, Repel -- Employment Branding 2007 Attracting Diverse Candidates Attracting the New Workforce Blogging outside the box Contract Recruiting CyberSleuthing! DC Recruiting E-Cruit Blog Fresh Meat Gen Y'd Generational Recruiting Hawaii Recruiting Head Count Hire Calling Interviewing and Selecting the Best Invested, innovative, brilliant: Improving the recruiting experience JobFares Lean Six Sigma Martin Snyder's Passing Scene Military Talent On The BioPharm Online Recruiting…Off the Record Quest For The Best Recruiter's Day Out Recruiting for the Non-Recruiter Recruiting ROI Recruiting Techniques in China Recruitment Rap Recruitment Spin Retention Secrets Sales, Fails, and Tales Search For G-Talents Seattle - A Recruiter's Perspective Second Life Recruitment Senior Care Notes SittingXlegged Social Internet Recruiting Social Media Marketing Solutions to Your Call Reluctance Cash Drain Talent in China Talent Wire The CareerXroads Annex The Gatekeeper The Good Search The Honest Recruiter The Life and Times of a Healthcare Recruiter The New 3 R's: Recruit, Re-Develop & Retain The Recruiter's Edge The Switch Todd Raphael's World of Talent Truth Justice and the American Way of Headhunting Video 2.0 for Recruitment Webcruiting Techniques
NEW! Put fresh ERE content on your website, blog, or corporate intranet.
Get a free ERE badge like the one above on your website in three easy steps today.