ERE.net  
Recruiting Intelligence. Recruiting Community™

CyberSleuthing!
...or how to really mine the web for candidates Expert research strategy from http://www.jobmachine.net/shally/
 
 
Thursday, December 14, 2006

Becoming a Promiscuous Linker on LinkedIn

posted by 
Shally Steckerl (1968)

Well I broke 4.5 million in network reach at LinkedIn.
 
“Yeah OK Shally, big deal... but why should I care?”

 

It means that just over half of the 8.5 million people on LinkedIn are at least 3 degrees away from me, which in turn means I can see their full profiles. It’s a significant number but only for lead generation and research. It doesn’t necessarily mean I have a strong network.

 

Or do I?

 

You may not know this because I don’t talk much about it, but I am the 27th most LinkedIn person. But I'm not alone. There’s about a dozen or so recruiters on the top 100 most connected list, which honestly is not that many considering that networking is in large part what we do (or should do) every day as recruiters. Bill Vick and Russ Moon may be some familiar names on that list, in case you were wondering. Those listed among the top 100 are the recruiters who have truly cracked the code on both quality as well as quantity… so far.

 

Won’t you join us?

 

There’s a list called TopLinked where you can see the names and links to profiles of the most networked, and if you visit the site on the left hand side you will see a “short list” of the Top 50 in groups of ten. Another site about top networked people is MiLinkWiki where you can find us by groups of how many first degree connections we have (in denominations like 10,000+ - 5,000-10,000 - 2,500-5,000 - 1,000-2,500).  All of us on those lists can see a vast part of the network, but network depth and network quality are two completely different things. They can co-exists, yet they are not mutually guaranteed, nor mutually exclusive.

 

What is Quality on LinkedIn?

 

In part, quality has to do with how many first degree contacts on your network are people who would pick up the phone if you called them, and consider granting you a favor if appropriate. It also has to do with how many of those first degree contacts in your network are super-connectors who can in turn extend their first degree contacts to you in a way that would also yield some kind of mutual opportunity.

 

Volume is to Quality like Popularity is to Value

 

You could have 20,000 first degree contacts, but if they all have small networks themselves then your reach may be even less than that of someone who has only 3,000 first degree contacts that are deeply networked. This paradigm exists because of the network multiplier effect. If you connect directly with 10 people that have a network reach in the millions, your network will be deepened because it will now contain a subgroup of their millions of contacts. But on the other hand you could connect with 10,000 people that have only a few first degree contacts each, and your LinkedIn network will have little depth in comparison. Lets call this the Promiscuity Ratio in honor of a recent CNN Money (Business 2.0) mention where Glenn Gutmacher was singled out as being one among a category of LinkedIn members referred to in the article as “promiscuous linkers.”

 

The Promiscuity Ratio could be measured as your first degree contacts divided by the total number of contacts you can reach. In the article the author quotes Glenn as having 3,500 first degree contacts and 3.5 million total contacts. So in Glenn’s case his Promiscuity Ratio would be .1%. In comparison, I currently have 8,600 first degree connections and 4.5 million total contacts so at .2% I am just about twice as promiscuous as Glenn. Having more than twice as many first degree contacts as Glenn my network depth is only one million contacts larger than his. I interpret this to mean that while I have access to a greater total sum of contacts, Glenn’s network is twice as "efficient" because with less than half my number of first degree contacts he can reach 3.5 million people. Given that we both use LinkedIn as a data mining tool, a larger total number of contacts is more effective for research purposes, yet less efficient in terms of true business network value.

 

What is Value?

 

One of my goals is to grow my network reach and hence increase the value of my network in sheer size, for my own use, but also for the benefit of my first degree contacts. Maybe some day I could be able to reach almost everyone on LinkedIn, but that is a tall order, particularly as it grows faster than I can keep up. Instead, over the last two years I have been focusing on adding value by strengthening my network and working towards making it more efficient. I do this in three key ways:

 

1) Helping first degree contacts grow their network in both volume and quality

 

This has been a largely manual process via mentoring individuals one-on-one and through my training classes, and also through media like my CheatSheet and the NPR interview I recently did. The payoff has been that an influential number of my first degree contacts have picked up the baton and are paying it forward with their networks so the cumulative effect is significant. But mostly this is about enrolling key people in my network to do more of #2 and #3 below.

 

2) Building rapport with first degree connections

 

A great way to strengthen your existing network and subsequently its value is to keep track of key contacts and acknowledge their recent promotion, job change, or any other significant alteration to their profile. From your LinkedIn Home, right below your Inbox, you can see a list of Network updates since your last login. Check this list for names of people you want to get to know better. If a name appears on this list it means their profile has recently experienced some kind of change. By the way, if you have the Outlook toolbar you can also see this list from your LinkedIn Dashboard in Outlook, and depending on your email preferences you may also be receiving updates via email. In either case, there is something new. Now you can very clearly look at a changed profile and tell what is new because LinkedIn will have added a “New” or “Updated” button to the sections on your contacts profile that have been added or modified.

 

So, drop your new found friend a message congratulating them on a promotion and you have just made a giant stride towards becoming part of their trusted contacts network.

 

3) Connecting to supper-connectors who bring with them access to large clouds of LinkedIn contacts that your first degree network currently can not see.

 

Another way is to spend a few minutes per month time ferreting out other super-connectors and inviting them to your network. By doing this, you are brining their second degree contacts into view from within your network not just for yourself but also for your first degree contacts. You should find super-connectors in the industries where you operate but its also a great idea to connect with fellow recruiters.

 

If you are not already connected to me I recommend you send me an invite. All you have to do is go to this page and enter this address: shally (AT) jobmachine (DOT) net in the “Shally’s email address” box then click on the “Send Invitation” button. I’ll accept your connection request and then you’ll have access to any of my 785,000 second degree contacts you don't already see.

 
 
Promiscuity isn’t so bad.

 

In my opinion folks like Ron Bates or Christian Mayaud who have both held the title of Top Linked are most likely flattered and not offended at all by being called promiscuous linkers. Why? Well, because recruiters like Glenn and other practitioners of the LinkedIn CyberSleuthing methods I teach are using the network to its fullest advantage for both quantity as well as quality. So, while you are at it, why not extend Glenn and Dave an invitation to your network as well? And why not connect with a few more practitioners of my "promiscuos linking" techniques? I’m willing to bet fellow CyberSleuths like:

among many others too numerous to fit in this page would be happy to accept your invitations as recruiters, bloggers, blog readers, ERE members, and generous people.

 

What else can you do about it?

 

You can reach out to even more people.

  1. Connect with the most networked Recruiters
  2. And with 120 well connected Recruiters who have chosen to be part of the OpenLink program and openly receive invitations
  3. Connect with interesting people from MyLinkWiki:
    1. MyLink10000
    2. MyLink5000
    3. MyLink2500
  4. Check out this Map of Top LinkedIn people and connect with the ones in your geography
  5. Read this book by Bill Vick
  6. Use my LinkedIn CheatSheet daily
  7. Join these groups:
    1. MyLinkedIn Power Forum (click Accept to join)
    2. LinkedInnovators
    3. linkedinlions
    4. LinkedinRecruiting
    5. My LinkedIn group: CyberSleuths (click Accept to join)

You could also become an open networker like some of the folks above. To go that route consider adding yourself to TopLinked.com, MyLinkWiki, and selecting to be an Open Link member of LinkedIn. You can often recognize others who are into open networking because sometimes they list their number of connections in the 5,000+ format, or they list have TopLinked and/or MyLinkWiki in their summary, or the include their email address in their name.

 
Won’t you join us?
 
Happy Holidays!shally
Shally  View Shally Steckerl's profile on LinkedIn
  
   P.S. New CheatSheet launching soon!
 


posted 12/14/2006 at 1:36 p.m. PT permalink | comments (12) | trackbacks (1) | email this posting
trackbacks

Trackback URL for this post:
http://www.ere.net/tb/5906A153A51141918B6697BF535C6A2F

Listed below are links to blogs that reference Becoming a Promiscuous Linker on LinkedIn:

Connect to almost 5 million Linked In members from Confessions of an Executive Restaurant Recruiter
tracked on 5/10/2007 at 5:35 a.m. PT

Back in March wrote a post, actually more of an invitation, about connecting to me on LinkedIn. At the time I was approaching 4 million people in my network. I had gotten the idea from my good friend Dave ... [continue]



comments

Mechanics
posted 12/14/2006 at 3:14 p.m. PT by Maureen Sharib

That's a wonderful and succinct explanation of how LinkedIn works. Thanks Shally!

Maureen



How to connect to Glenn, the "promiscuous linker"
posted 12/14/2006 at 7:59 p.m. PT by Glenn Gutmacher

I cracked up when that Business 2.0 magazine / CNN Money article came out, labelling people like us in that way. But yes, I am happy to be linked. Since Shally gave his email, I'll give you mine: linkedin [at] recruiting-online [dot] com

Thx for the mentions & a useful blog post, SS!



One more question though...
posted 12/15/2006 at 3:37 a.m. PT by Maureen Sharib

Does it pay to pay? I can never get a straight answer outta' those guys at LinkedIn - do you get more results when you "pay" their monthly/yearly access fees?

Common sense tells me I would but I'm not convinced, after paying for a year and seeing others (with less connections and using the FREE service), get darn near the same results as I did. Throughout the year I did some "test runs" of certain companies/certain titles over in the Yahoo group, Sourcers Unleashed, and many times the results came in pretty much the same across the board, pay or no-pay. LinkedIn did send me a cool t-shirt when I joined, though!

I've asked them about this and they mumble jumble responses about algorithms and connections and so on but I suspect the real answer lies somewhere in the algorithms that I further suspect are constantly changing, tightening down over there to get people to pay.

We do live in a profit society folks, so get used to the idea.

I know, I know, this is starting to sound like a conspiracy theory...

Can anyone answer? Does it pay to pay?

Link to me too! If you ask me I will join your network!

maureen at techtrak.com

I know some of you guys are wondering why I spell out my email address like I just did. I find if I am more careful in leaving my email signature turds around the net they're less likely to be "picked up" in the spider sweeps email address collectors are constantly using - much like what the networking organizations like ZoomInfo and spoke constantly run across the 'net, sweeping info into their databases using their own particular algorithm recipes looking for "names" and "titles". I find I get LESS junk mail as a result. Just a little less - I did a lot of damage to myself before I realized that the spam showing up in my email box was much due to this bad habit of mine of including the @ symbol, which is what I suspect the collectors gather with.

This last theory (or the first) could be full of holes - if it is I'd apreciate any of you correcting me on this.

maureen at techtrak.com

;)



yup. spambots are a pain
posted 12/15/2006 at 2:26 p.m. PT by Shally Steckerl

Yes, you are spot on Maureen!

Shally (at) jobmachine (dot) net is what I do, and for the same reason.

Though highly illegal (yes they are cracking down) email harvesters can pick up your address when you have a hyperlink (mailto:) but also when you spell it out without the spaces. They are trained to recognize the @ and look for the pattern of "something to the left, something to the right, a dot and something to the right of that"

Another thing you can do is

shally.REMOVETHIS@NOSPAM.jobmachine.net

or use a gif with your sig on it and nothing else.

OR for a last line of defence hire yourself a nice server side spam company like spamarrest.com or one of those. I actually went a bit overboard on this topic some time ago:

http://www.ere.net/blogs/CyberSleuthing/6D71312C6EB7460A8CC24C60DFBE55D0.asp

and if you recall my appology about a certain typo you found along with a follow up on spam:

http://www.ere.net/blogs/CyberSleuthing/24DD1E5780C54FF782F5A94BDD923736.asp



Spamarrest
posted 12/15/2006 at 4:01 p.m. PT by Shally Steckerl

And one more thing - in case readers are wondering about how well something like Spamarrest works, here's my statistics:

Messages Processed 242,935
Messages Forwarded 33,674
Spam Percentage 86.14%

So, 86% of what hits my account is spam that is blocked by Spamarrest. A few things still come in that are spammy but not many - say another 4%, which is very manageable.

Get SpamArrest here: http://www.spamarrest.com/affl?4033372



I'm Krista-licious, but I'm not promiscuous :-)
posted 12/16/2006 at 2:07 p.m. PT by Krista Bradford

(You'd have to have heard the song "Fergalicious" to get the reference - the song my 13-year-old plays incessantly.) I do have a point to make.
Promiscuity is defined as: the practice of making relatively casual and indiscriminate choices. FWIW, I could argue that I am not promiscuous in my linkages at LinkedIn because I don't do it casually. It is a strategy designed to build out the networks I need.

Terrific piece. Great info, Shally!



darwin - linkedin - shally & promiscuous linking
posted 12/16/2006 at 2:58 p.m. PT by Dakotta -

“This monkey mythology of Darwin is the cause of permissiveness, promiscuity, prophylactics, perversions, pregnancies, abortions, pornotherapy, pollution, poisoning and proliferation of crimes of all types” - Judge Braswell Dean quotes ... not to mention "promiscuous linking" ;-)

great post Shally!



darwin - linkedin - shally & promiscuous linking
posted 12/16/2006 at 2:58 p.m. PT by Dakotta -

“This monkey mythology of Darwin is the cause of permissiveness, promiscuity, prophylactics, perversions, pregnancies, abortions, pornotherapy, pollution, poisoning and proliferation of crimes of all types” - Judge Braswell Dean ... not to mention "promiscuous linking" ;-)

great post Shally!



Thanks for the Value Added Post and Mention
posted 12/18/2006 at 1:56 a.m. PT by Russ Moon,MBA

Shally,

Shally .2%
Glenn .1%
Russ .1%

There are all types of methods to build your network depending on your strategic objectives.

You can have both quality and quantity. Quality defined as the usefulness of the network populace and quantity defined as the mass of the network. You can build both simultaneously.

Maureen, I believe it pays to pay if being able to directly contact more of the network is value added for you.

Linkedin has not peaked as a tool, it is actually becoming more multi-dimensional in how the data can be leveraged.

I would encourage everyone to connect with the "superconnectors" ( I think that is a more accurate term than promiscuous )and also start seeding your networks with prime industry contacts.

Then you can have the reach and a growing network of prime talent.









Becoming a Promiscuous Linker on LinkedIn
posted 12/18/2006 at 1:12 p.m. PT by Keith Halperin

Thanks, Shally. I’m glad to be mentioned.

I long ago found out that the “key” is to connect with a dozen or twoo of the super-connectors. That way you have 90% of their network, but don’t have large numbers of requests to deal with.

I would find it useful if we could be "promiscuous" with Linked In Requests. I'd pay if I could send out an unlimited (or very large, say 1000) number of requests at a given time.


Cheers,


Keith (doesn't really care about spam)
Kdhalperin@sbcglobal.net




Great article - thanks for sharing!
posted 7/27/2008 at 8:28 p.m. PT by stacy zapar - 10,000+

Thanks, Shally. Although some of the specifics are a bit dated (as I'm sure you have way more than 4.6 million network reach these days), the content is still very useful and relevant. Thanks for sharing!

Stacy Zapar - 10,000+ 1st-level connections
I accept all invites at http://tinyurl.com/324j5m




Please log in to post a comment to this blog. New users, please click here.

You are not logged in.

[log in] | [register]




about this blogger

(1968)
photo of Shally Steckerl
JobMachine

about Shally Steckerl

email Shally Steckerl






syndicate this blog

 





CyberSleuthing! blogroll

.Buzz About Shally

Amitai's Recruitomatic

Amybeth

Asia Pacific Headhunter

Barbara Ling

Bearing Fruit

Bearing Fruit

Betsy Beard - PR

Bill Warren

Career Capitalist

Career Xroads

Carl Chapman

Dave Mendoza

David Perry

Dennis Smith

Frank Mulligan in China

Glenn Gutmacher

Human Dimensions

Jason Gorham

Jason Warner

Jeff Hunter

Jeremy Langhans

Jim Durbin

Jim Stroud

JobMachine

JobMachine

Joel Abraham

Kriss Dunn

Krista Bradford

Medical Devices

Microsoft Jobs Blog

MN Headhunter

Moises Lopez

PassingNotes (Dave Carpe_

Recruiting Animal

Recruiting.com (Jason Davis)

RecruitingFly

ResearchZilla

Ritesh Nair

Rob Salerno

Sean Rehder

Simon Meth

Sourcers Apprentice

Sourcing Riff

Talentism

Taleo

The Chad

Wendy Holstine

Winner of Best Recruiting Research Award!




more ere blogs

3-O’Clock Coffee Break

3rd Rock

A to Z of Health Care Recruiting

Ali’s Sourcing Techniques

Ask The Recruiter

Attract, Retain, Repel -- Employment Branding 2007

Attracting Diverse Candidates

Attracting the New Workforce

Blogging outside the box

Contract Recruiting

CyberSleuthing!

DC Recruiting

E-Cruit Blog

Fresh Meat

Gen Y'd

Generational Recruiting

Hawaii Recruiting

Head Count

Hire Calling

Interviewing and Selecting the Best

Invested, innovative, brilliant: Improving the recruiting experience

JobFares

Lean Six Sigma

Martin Snyder's Passing Scene

Military Talent

On The BioPharm

Online Recruiting…Off the Record

Quest For The Best

Recruiter's Day Out

Recruiting for the Non-Recruiter

Recruiting ROI

Recruiting Techniques in China

Recruitment Rap

Recruitment Spin

Retention Secrets

Sales, Fails, and Tales

Search For G-Talents

Seattle - A Recruiter's Perspective

Second Life Recruitment

Senior Care Notes

SittingXlegged

Social Internet Recruiting

Social Media Marketing

Solutions to Your Call Reluctance Cash Drain

Talent in China

Talent Wire

The CareerXroads Annex

The Gatekeeper

The Good Search

The Honest Recruiter

The Life and Times of a Healthcare Recruiter

The New 3 R's: Recruit, Re-Develop & Retain

The Recruiter's Edge

The Switch

Todd Raphael's World of Talent

Truth Justice and the American Way of Headhunting

Video 2.0 for Recruitment

Webcruiting Techniques




NEW! Put fresh ERE content on your website, blog, or corporate intranet.

Get a free ERE badge like the one above on your website in three easy steps today.




most commented on (past 30 days)


in the entire ERE Blog Network...

Older Workers: Forget Hair Dye and Botox (4 comments)

$10,000 Referral Fee (4 comments)

Opening Up to the Atypical Worker (3 comments)

“I’m sure you get calls from recruiters all th