Receive daily articles & headlines each day in your inbox with your free ERE Daily Subscription.

Not logged in. [log in or register]

Worst Job Growth in Two Years Stuns Analysts

by
John Zappe
Jan 10, 2014, 9:39 am ET

December 2013 econ indicatorsThe government’s estimates of December’s job growth, projected by most economists to come in at somewhat over 190,000, stunned analysts with the report of an anemic 74,000 new jobs.

The report, released this morning by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, contradicts other, positive signs of economic strength, including strong home sales and a rise in the manufacturing index over the last several months. The National Employment Report from ADP and Moody’s Analytics, out Wednesday, estimated the private sector in December added 238,000 non-farm jobs.

The job growth number was the worst since May 2011.

So surprising was the report that Kathy Bostjancic, director of macroeconomic analysis with  the business research group The Conference Board, issued a statement saying, ”A gain of only 74,000 new jobs in December stands in contrast to the strengthening posted in other major economic data, suggesting the dip in hiring might prove temporary.”

Even the drop in the unemployment rate — from 7.0 percent to 6.7 percent — was more a sign of weakness than strength, as it was in large part due to workers dropping out of the labor force. The BLS said, “The civilian labor force participation rate declined by 0.2 percentage point to 62.8 percent in December, offsetting a change of the same magnitude in November.”

During 2013, the participation rate dropped .8 percentage points.

Numerically, there were almost half a million fewer unemployed persons in December, and 1.9 fewer for the year. According to the report, 10.4 million Americans are officially unemployed. An additional 7.8 million are working par-time because they can’t find full-time work, and 2.4 million more are out of work and looking, but didn’t meet the official definition of unemployed.

When these numbers are added to the official unemployed counts, the so-called U-6 unemployed and underutilized percentage is 13.1 on a seasonally adjusted basis.

Most industry sectors either shed jobs or had only modest increases in hiring. By far the biggest gains came in retail (up by 55,300) and temporary employment, which added 40,400 jobs. The temp industry added 247,400 jobs in 2013.

Healthcare, another growth industry and the strongest sector throughout the recession and the recovery, actually lost 6,000 jobs in December. The industry added 207,600 jobs last year.

Construction lost 16,000 jobs in the government report. In the ADP report, it was one of the strongest industries, contributing 48,000 jobs. Manufacturing grew by 9,000 jobs; ADP said 19,000 new manufacturing jobs were created.

Though the two reports rarely are in perfect alignment — the methods of collecting and analyzing the numbers are significantly different — they are equally as rarely this far apart. The sharp differences in both the reports and with what labor economists were expecting prompted Moody’s chief analyst Mark Zandi, a lead analyst on the ADP report, to say on CNBC that he expects the government will significantly revise its December report when it issues its report on January’s job market February 7.

Each monthly jobs report is technically preliminary and is typically revised at least twice. Today’s report revised upward the November jobs count from an initial 203,000 new jobs to 241,000. No adjustment was made for October.

This article is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to offer specific legal advice. You should consult your legal counsel regarding any threatened or pending litigation.

  1. Phil Ojalvo

    Not surprising at all. Few new jobs are being created, and more and more Americans are just giving up. BLS plays with the numbers to make things appear better, but they can’t do it forever. Look at the percentage and number of kids graduating from college who are unable to find careers, so they resort to waiting tables, etc. Are they counted as ‘unemployed’? I don’t think so.

  2. Keith Halperin

    I’ve heard that we shouldn’t take too much stock in any given month’s figures- they’re often revised considerably, and it’s better to get a multi-month average to get an idea of what’s really going on.

    -kh

Post a comment

Please log in to post a comment.

Note: You need to sign up for an account on our new commenting system if you haven't already done so — even if you have an existing ERE account. Find out why »

Login Information