<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don’t Blame The Headhunters &#8212; Get Better at Keeping Your Employees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/</link>
	<description>Recruiting News, Recruiting Events, Recruiting Community, Social Recruiting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:17:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Gaines</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-96478</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Gaines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 13:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=30038#comment-96478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was on a funny part I guess.....
http://www.gsiconsultants.com/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was on a funny part I guess&#8230;..<br />
<a href="http://www.gsiconsultants.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.gsiconsultants.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K J</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-90780</link>
		<dc:creator>K J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=30038#comment-90780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Carol. Thanks again. I do feel however that it&#039;s not a black and white question with a yes or no answer. I am hoping to better understand the shades of grey involved...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Carol. Thanks again. I do feel however that it&#8217;s not a black and white question with a yes or no answer. I am hoping to better understand the shades of grey involved&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Schultz</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-90777</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Schultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=30038#comment-90777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@KJ: Still, yes. If someone is stupid enough to post publicly, they get what they get. Think Facebook. As for your B question. No clue. I&#039;m sure you could hire someone to do that manually. It wouldn&#039;t be too difficult to get done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@KJ: Still, yes. If someone is stupid enough to post publicly, they get what they get. Think Facebook. As for your B question. No clue. I&#8217;m sure you could hire someone to do that manually. It wouldn&#8217;t be too difficult to get done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K J</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-90771</link>
		<dc:creator>K J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=30038#comment-90771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Carol. Thanks for the reply. 

A1. I was asking more from an HR Managers perspective. Is it ok to monitor job boards to see which of my current employees are looking elsewhere and engage them in the hope of changing their mind? More importantly, what are the long term and short term negative impacts of such a practice? It seems to be bordering on employee privacy rights. If not legally, then morally. 

B. Are there service providers out there that provide company HR Managers with an outsourced monitoring service?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Carol. Thanks for the reply. </p>
<p>A1. I was asking more from an HR Managers perspective. Is it ok to monitor job boards to see which of my current employees are looking elsewhere and engage them in the hope of changing their mind? More importantly, what are the long term and short term negative impacts of such a practice? It seems to be bordering on employee privacy rights. If not legally, then morally. </p>
<p>B. Are there service providers out there that provide company HR Managers with an outsourced monitoring service?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Schultz</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-90768</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Schultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=30038#comment-90768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@KJ: In response to A1, yes. Anyone putting themselves out there on a job board publicly gets what they get. If you are going to put your info on the web it&#039;s imperative you do so without a name or phone number if you don&#039;t want anyone in your company to know. Make up a separate email address and have potential employers make initial contact that way. You should also keep the name of your company private, as in &quot;confidential&quot;.

Also, yes to A2.

Regarding B, can you be more specific about what you&#039;re asking?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@KJ: In response to A1, yes. Anyone putting themselves out there on a job board publicly gets what they get. If you are going to put your info on the web it&#8217;s imperative you do so without a name or phone number if you don&#8217;t want anyone in your company to know. Make up a separate email address and have potential employers make initial contact that way. You should also keep the name of your company private, as in &#8220;confidential&#8221;.</p>
<p>Also, yes to A2.</p>
<p>Regarding B, can you be more specific about what you&#8217;re asking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K J</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-90733</link>
		<dc:creator>K J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=30038#comment-90733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Query: Speaking of holding on to your employees better:

A: Is it OK for an HR Manager to:
1. Monitor the online job boards to find which employees are considering jumping ship?
2. Engage such employees (Not confront them) to understand what potential holes can be fixed? The immediate cost savings are obviously apparent. The tangential short term and long term implications are what I would like to know more about.

B: Are such services offered by a third party vendor? I have looked high and low, but have come up empty.

Thanks.
KJ.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Query: Speaking of holding on to your employees better:</p>
<p>A: Is it OK for an HR Manager to:<br />
1. Monitor the online job boards to find which employees are considering jumping ship?<br />
2. Engage such employees (Not confront them) to understand what potential holes can be fixed? The immediate cost savings are obviously apparent. The tangential short term and long term implications are what I would like to know more about.</p>
<p>B: Are such services offered by a third party vendor? I have looked high and low, but have come up empty.</p>
<p>Thanks.<br />
KJ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Halperin</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-86100</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Halperin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=30038#comment-86100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Ken. Well said.
&quot;If employees are respected, appreciated, adequately paid, all the things we read about over and over- they will not easily be pulled away or “poached.” Very true, but how many employers are willing to do all of these?

Cheers,
Keith]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ken. Well said.<br />
&#8220;If employees are respected, appreciated, adequately paid, all the things we read about over and over- they will not easily be pulled away or “poached.” Very true, but how many employers are willing to do all of these?</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Keith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fraser Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-86034</link>
		<dc:creator>Fraser Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 08:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=30038#comment-86034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Ken - I love the affair analogy! You just re-wrote the whole article in under 100 words - congratulations! :) Great summary and insight. 

@Anmol - thanks for your kind comments. Don&#039;t hesitate to get in touch directly if you ever have any questions. fraser@headhuntin.com.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ken &#8211; I love the affair analogy! You just re-wrote the whole article in under 100 words &#8211; congratulations! :) Great summary and insight. </p>
<p>@Anmol &#8211; thanks for your kind comments. Don&#8217;t hesitate to get in touch directly if you ever have any questions. <a href="mailto:fraser@headhuntin.com">fraser@headhuntin.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anmol Singh</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-86024</link>
		<dc:creator>Anmol Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 07:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=30038#comment-86024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent Fraser,especially the difference between Poaching and Headhunting.I am little young in this game but you&#039;re the one who always there to help me to strengthen the basics.Thanks again you are the real motivator:)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent Fraser,especially the difference between Poaching and Headhunting.I am little young in this game but you&#8217;re the one who always there to help me to strengthen the basics.Thanks again you are the real motivator:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Schmitt</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-85986</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Schmitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=30038#comment-85986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well done! This sounds a lot like someone claiming it wasn&#039;t his/her fault they were engaged in an affair- people are rarely &quot;lured away&quot; and the victim of an affair.  People don&#039;t stray if things are perfect at home.  The same is true of employees.  If employees are respected, appreciated, adequately paid, all the things we read about over and over- they will not easily be pulled away or &quot;poached.&quot;  Will a good company every lose a good employee even if they have done everything right? Yes, it may happen.  And it may be the fault of the company.  Other times, it just was &quot;too good an opportunity&quot; to pass up.  But that does not mean a headhunter is to blame.  In those cases, ti&#039;s timing,  In other cases, it&#039;s a company who is failing to make an employee WANT to stay. In that situation, the headhunter is simply offering greener grass. And that&#039;s called a free market.
Ken Schmitt
www.turningpointsearch.net]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done! This sounds a lot like someone claiming it wasn&#8217;t his/her fault they were engaged in an affair- people are rarely &#8220;lured away&#8221; and the victim of an affair.  People don&#8217;t stray if things are perfect at home.  The same is true of employees.  If employees are respected, appreciated, adequately paid, all the things we read about over and over- they will not easily be pulled away or &#8220;poached.&#8221;  Will a good company every lose a good employee even if they have done everything right? Yes, it may happen.  And it may be the fault of the company.  Other times, it just was &#8220;too good an opportunity&#8221; to pass up.  But that does not mean a headhunter is to blame.  In those cases, ti&#8217;s timing,  In other cases, it&#8217;s a company who is failing to make an employee WANT to stay. In that situation, the headhunter is simply offering greener grass. And that&#8217;s called a free market.<br />
Ken Schmitt<br />
<a href="http://www.turningpointsearch.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.turningpointsearch.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Halperin</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-85984</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Halperin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=30038#comment-85984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Richard. Your practical, sensible perspective is why you should write...

&quot;And all in all you should be prepared for someone to leave.&quot;
Correct in principle, as would a mutually beneficial employment relationship based on respect between two mature adults... In practice, many/most employers want someone to leave when THEY say so, not earlier or later.  As far as &quot;a mutually beneficial relationship based on respect between two mature adults...&quot; I think way down deep a lot of employers would prefer an employment relationship based on domination &amp; submission- if not a slave then a domestic animal. Think of a technical/professional superstar version of &quot;Smithers&quot; on The Simpsons- someone who lives to anticipate his/her employer&#039;s wants/needs, and would be willing to die for them, yet could be tossed away without a care when no longer useful, and would be ever so happy to train his/her replacement... Folks, you think I&#039;m being to harsh? Well, you may not have worked for some of the &quot;pieces if work &quot;I have....

Drifting away from the rather creepy psychological stuff, it does make sense to me that an employer should wish to anticipate and minimize unnecessary turnover- just don&#039;t ask recruiters to do it- it&#039;s diametrically opposed to our interests, i.e. as long as there is money to pay recruiters, substantial turnover gives us work...

Cheers,

Keith]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard. Your practical, sensible perspective is why you should write&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;And all in all you should be prepared for someone to leave.&#8221;<br />
Correct in principle, as would a mutually beneficial employment relationship based on respect between two mature adults&#8230; In practice, many/most employers want someone to leave when THEY say so, not earlier or later.  As far as &#8220;a mutually beneficial relationship based on respect between two mature adults&#8230;&#8221; I think way down deep a lot of employers would prefer an employment relationship based on domination &amp; submission- if not a slave then a domestic animal. Think of a technical/professional superstar version of &#8220;Smithers&#8221; on The Simpsons- someone who lives to anticipate his/her employer&#8217;s wants/needs, and would be willing to die for them, yet could be tossed away without a care when no longer useful, and would be ever so happy to train his/her replacement&#8230; Folks, you think I&#8217;m being to harsh? Well, you may not have worked for some of the &#8220;pieces if work &#8220;I have&#8230;.</p>
<p>Drifting away from the rather creepy psychological stuff, it does make sense to me that an employer should wish to anticipate and minimize unnecessary turnover- just don&#8217;t ask recruiters to do it- it&#8217;s diametrically opposed to our interests, i.e. as long as there is money to pay recruiters, substantial turnover gives us work&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Keith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Araujo</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-85937</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Araujo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=30038#comment-85937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I would have thought any recruiter doing this would eventually get bored of paying back rebates every month when the candidate didn’t work out and wise up to the fact that they have to give a balanced view on potential employers. To generalize and say this is the practice of “most” [recruiters] may be a little misleading, no?&quot; - Fraser

I was referring to people in general, HMs and recruiters, as I&#039;ve had this issue with both in the past, contract side and corporate side for recruiters.  I think good recruiters will be honest about a company, but there are plenty of resume mills out there taking a volume approach to overcome the losses they likely make.

@ Martin
Good points, the contract side isn&#039;t often thought of.

@ Keith
I&#039;d much prefer to let someone else storm the beach on using FB and other social media in that way.  I realize that would keep me from being an innovator, but my personal views just can&#039;t support it.  I believe people should have performance goals and be measured against them, pure and simple.  If they do well they should be paid well and treated well, if they do poorly they should be trained and corrected or let go if it&#039;s perpetual bad performance for whatever reason.  I personally don&#039;t care about their social media presence or anything else, and I don&#039;t think many if any people have the ability to make use of that kind of high level data/intelligence as it may relate to recruiting and retention these days.  As such it&#039;s more a violation of their personal lives when it happens than anything else.  And all in all you should be prepared for someone to leave.  What if they walk in front of a bus or something?  They&#039;re still gone, but you can&#039;t plan for that.  So you should step the preparedness back a notch and realize that anyone may leave at any time for any reason, and that retention in those cases where you can get warning is secondary to making sure you know what you&#039;re going to do if it happens and you don&#039;t have any warning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I would have thought any recruiter doing this would eventually get bored of paying back rebates every month when the candidate didn’t work out and wise up to the fact that they have to give a balanced view on potential employers. To generalize and say this is the practice of “most” [recruiters] may be a little misleading, no?&#8221; &#8211; Fraser</p>
<p>I was referring to people in general, HMs and recruiters, as I&#8217;ve had this issue with both in the past, contract side and corporate side for recruiters.  I think good recruiters will be honest about a company, but there are plenty of resume mills out there taking a volume approach to overcome the losses they likely make.</p>
<p>@ Martin<br />
Good points, the contract side isn&#8217;t often thought of.</p>
<p>@ Keith<br />
I&#8217;d much prefer to let someone else storm the beach on using FB and other social media in that way.  I realize that would keep me from being an innovator, but my personal views just can&#8217;t support it.  I believe people should have performance goals and be measured against them, pure and simple.  If they do well they should be paid well and treated well, if they do poorly they should be trained and corrected or let go if it&#8217;s perpetual bad performance for whatever reason.  I personally don&#8217;t care about their social media presence or anything else, and I don&#8217;t think many if any people have the ability to make use of that kind of high level data/intelligence as it may relate to recruiting and retention these days.  As such it&#8217;s more a violation of their personal lives when it happens than anything else.  And all in all you should be prepared for someone to leave.  What if they walk in front of a bus or something?  They&#8217;re still gone, but you can&#8217;t plan for that.  So you should step the preparedness back a notch and realize that anyone may leave at any time for any reason, and that retention in those cases where you can get warning is secondary to making sure you know what you&#8217;re going to do if it happens and you don&#8217;t have any warning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Barnes</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-85921</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 18:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=30038#comment-85921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The clients of mine who were most successful in retaining their top R&amp;D talent had an environment of open communication between managers and staff.  I&#039;ve known several managers who were kept informed of their key worker&#039;s job search status.  While that may sound counter-intuitive, both parties stand to gain a lot.  The manager is not blind-sided by having a key person leave suddenly.  The worker gains enormous good will from their previous employers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The clients of mine who were most successful in retaining their top R&amp;D talent had an environment of open communication between managers and staff.  I&#8217;ve known several managers who were kept informed of their key worker&#8217;s job search status.  While that may sound counter-intuitive, both parties stand to gain a lot.  The manager is not blind-sided by having a key person leave suddenly.  The worker gains enormous good will from their previous employers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fraser Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-85913</link>
		<dc:creator>Fraser Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=30038#comment-85913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Keith - Welcome back! &quot;But I haven&#039;t been away&quot;.&quot;Ohhhhhh,we know!&quot; :)

Always good to see your comments Keith - thanks for contributing. I pity the readers who read your responses for the first time - it take a few of your responses to work out the Keithlish (your acronym language). I&#039;m fluent now! All the best. Keep flying the flag!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Keith &#8211; Welcome back! &#8220;But I haven&#8217;t been away&#8221;.&#8221;Ohhhhhh,we know!&#8221; :)</p>
<p>Always good to see your comments Keith &#8211; thanks for contributing. I pity the readers who read your responses for the first time &#8211; it take a few of your responses to work out the Keithlish (your acronym language). I&#8217;m fluent now! All the best. Keep flying the flag!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Halperin</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-85909</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Halperin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=30038#comment-85909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Fraser: Well said. As a note to 
&quot;why is it therefore ethical for almost every single Fortune 500 company to still engage senior-level headhunters to find their executives?&quot; Two words: &quot;CULPABLE DENIABILITY&quot;. You can have 3PRs &quot;do what needs to be done&quot; to get the people that are sought, without getting you/your own people in trouble, as in: &quot;Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?&quot;

@ Richard: Couldn&#039;t have said it better. Also, you SHOULD write. Finally, the owner of your company was very heavy-handed with what he asked, but ISTM good sense that internal or contract recruiters should check up on resume boards to see who might be planning to fly the coop- I frequently do. Large companies could hire what I call an &quot;External Employee Engagement Specialist or EEES&quot; aka, &quot;Snoop&quot; to monitor employees&#039; external SN activity and perhaps use some of those new tools which indicate by their activity on FB, LI, Github, StackOverflow. etc. that someone may be thinking of leaving. In the event that some activity were noticed, appropriate actions could be taken to help diffuse the situation (if the person were valuable) or start the search for a new one ahead of time- either way much value is gained and money saved. If you prefer, you could offer your valued employees &quot;multi-year, guaranteed-raise/bonus, no-termination-without-cause employment contracts&quot;, and that&#039;ll make sure the sane ones stay. I&#039;d prefer to see companies employ the latter, and would expect them to see the former...

Cheers,

Keith &quot;Think If I Used My Powers for Good and Not for Evil&quot; Halperin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Fraser: Well said. As a note to<br />
&#8220;why is it therefore ethical for almost every single Fortune 500 company to still engage senior-level headhunters to find their executives?&#8221; Two words: &#8220;CULPABLE DENIABILITY&#8221;. You can have 3PRs &#8220;do what needs to be done&#8221; to get the people that are sought, without getting you/your own people in trouble, as in: &#8220;Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?&#8221;</p>
<p>@ Richard: Couldn&#8217;t have said it better. Also, you SHOULD write. Finally, the owner of your company was very heavy-handed with what he asked, but ISTM good sense that internal or contract recruiters should check up on resume boards to see who might be planning to fly the coop- I frequently do. Large companies could hire what I call an &#8220;External Employee Engagement Specialist or EEES&#8221; aka, &#8220;Snoop&#8221; to monitor employees&#8217; external SN activity and perhaps use some of those new tools which indicate by their activity on FB, LI, Github, StackOverflow. etc. that someone may be thinking of leaving. In the event that some activity were noticed, appropriate actions could be taken to help diffuse the situation (if the person were valuable) or start the search for a new one ahead of time- either way much value is gained and money saved. If you prefer, you could offer your valued employees &#8220;multi-year, guaranteed-raise/bonus, no-termination-without-cause employment contracts&#8221;, and that&#8217;ll make sure the sane ones stay. I&#8217;d prefer to see companies employ the latter, and would expect them to see the former&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Keith &#8220;Think If I Used My Powers for Good and Not for Evil&#8221; Halperin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fraser Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-85901</link>
		<dc:creator>Fraser Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=30038#comment-85901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Martin - thanks for commenting. Ethics is certainly a huge point of debate isn&#039;t it? There&#039;s a can of worms right there!:) What is right and wrong? Is it wrong to headhunt someone and &quot;cause&quot; a potential loss, monetary or otherwise to the company they work for? Is it right to overlook potentially the best candidate for a job, offering them potentially better prospects for them as an individual and their family, because they work at a competitor firm so shouldn&#039;t be contacted? I&#039;d imagine it would be close to a stale mate situation in any debate on this subject but would hope in the end the person comes before the company.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Martin &#8211; thanks for commenting. Ethics is certainly a huge point of debate isn&#8217;t it? There&#8217;s a can of worms right there!:) What is right and wrong? Is it wrong to headhunt someone and &#8220;cause&#8221; a potential loss, monetary or otherwise to the company they work for? Is it right to overlook potentially the best candidate for a job, offering them potentially better prospects for them as an individual and their family, because they work at a competitor firm so shouldn&#8217;t be contacted? I&#8217;d imagine it would be close to a stale mate situation in any debate on this subject but would hope in the end the person comes before the company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fraser Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-85896</link>
		<dc:creator>Fraser Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=30038#comment-85896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Richard - &quot;The tendency of most people in practice is to try and hide what they feel are the company’s negatives.&quot; I would have thought any recruiter doing this would eventually get bored of paying back rebates every month when the candidate didn&#039;t work out and wise up to the fact that they have to give a balanced view on potential employers. To generalize and say this is the practice of &quot;most&quot; [recruiters] may be a little misleading, no? 

BTW most people here are recruiters just like you. The writers are just recruiters who happen to contribute articles. You should write the article you wish to see on here as you&#039;re clearly very passionate about it which is always a great starting point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Richard &#8211; &#8220;The tendency of most people in practice is to try and hide what they feel are the company’s negatives.&#8221; I would have thought any recruiter doing this would eventually get bored of paying back rebates every month when the candidate didn&#8217;t work out and wise up to the fact that they have to give a balanced view on potential employers. To generalize and say this is the practice of &#8220;most&#8221; [recruiters] may be a little misleading, no? </p>
<p>BTW most people here are recruiters just like you. The writers are just recruiters who happen to contribute articles. You should write the article you wish to see on here as you&#8217;re clearly very passionate about it which is always a great starting point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Schultz</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-85895</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Schultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=30038#comment-85895</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Richard: I could&#039;t agree more about the circumstances you&#039;re dealing with and mastering them rather than having your circumstances manage you. I do believe that all companies can be better, however.  Your point about the relevance of best practices is significant from the standpoint of &quot;won&#039;t be implemented&quot;. Of course, I can&#039;t change every company.  They don&#039;t all want to change. Maybe I&#039;ll put your suggestion about what to do when you&#039;re at a company that won&#039;t change in my article pipeline.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard: I could&#8217;t agree more about the circumstances you&#8217;re dealing with and mastering them rather than having your circumstances manage you. I do believe that all companies can be better, however.  Your point about the relevance of best practices is significant from the standpoint of &#8220;won&#8217;t be implemented&#8221;. Of course, I can&#8217;t change every company.  They don&#8217;t all want to change. Maybe I&#8217;ll put your suggestion about what to do when you&#8217;re at a company that won&#8217;t change in my article pipeline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Snyder</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-85894</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Snyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=30038#comment-85894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A distinction should be drawn between people who work &quot;at-will&quot; and those with employment contacts. In the latter case, improper recruiting has resulted in tortious interference actions against the recruiter.  If you work in spaces where contracts are common, you likely already know the rules, but if you don&#039;t, you should consult competent legal counsel before dealing with that type of situation.  

In terms of ethics: they can never be bound fully by written rules. Words can&#039;t hold the spirit of fair play, truthfulness, and faithful service- they can only barely contain people who lack character, but they can&#039;t substitute for it, and that applies to every area of life.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A distinction should be drawn between people who work &#8220;at-will&#8221; and those with employment contacts. In the latter case, improper recruiting has resulted in tortious interference actions against the recruiter.  If you work in spaces where contracts are common, you likely already know the rules, but if you don&#8217;t, you should consult competent legal counsel before dealing with that type of situation.  </p>
<p>In terms of ethics: they can never be bound fully by written rules. Words can&#8217;t hold the spirit of fair play, truthfulness, and faithful service- they can only barely contain people who lack character, but they can&#8217;t substitute for it, and that applies to every area of life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fraser Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2013/01/29/dont-blame-the-headhunters-get-better-at-keeping-your-employees/comment-page-1/#comment-85893</link>
		<dc:creator>Fraser Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 16:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=30038#comment-85893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Carol - thanks for your kind comments. I&#039;m glad we&#039;re on the same page! I totally agree with you. 

@Andre - thanks - I&#039;m glad the article resonates with your experience. Hopefully some people will leave your client from time to time to keep you in business! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Carol &#8211; thanks for your kind comments. I&#8217;m glad we&#8217;re on the same page! I totally agree with you. </p>
<p>@Andre &#8211; thanks &#8211; I&#8217;m glad the article resonates with your experience. Hopefully some people will leave your client from time to time to keep you in business! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
