<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recruiters: Your Days Are Numbered</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/</link>
	<description>Recruiting News, Recruiting Events, Recruiting Community, Social Recruiting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 03:19:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology’s Impact on Executive Recruiting &#171; Wanted: Critical Skills!</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/comment-page-3/#comment-92949</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology’s Impact on Executive Recruiting &#171; Wanted: Critical Skills!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=29293#comment-92949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a recent article, “Recruiters: Your days are Numbered,” Lior Shamir points out that such software packages as BranchOut, Jobvite, and HireRabbit are “ . [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a recent article, “Recruiters: Your days are Numbered,” Lior Shamir points out that such software packages as BranchOut, Jobvite, and HireRabbit are “ . [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Recruitment &#8211; The End Of The World As We Know It? &#124; Douglas Jackson Executive Recruitment Consultants for Call Centres &#38; Customer Services</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/comment-page-3/#comment-84527</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Recruitment &#8211; The End Of The World As We Know It? &#124; Douglas Jackson Executive Recruitment Consultants for Call Centres &#38; Customer Services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 13:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=29293#comment-84527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] can see two such articles  listed here from Lior Shamir; Recruiters your days are numbered  and the other, with a slightly different view from Adrian Kinnersley; Why Linkedin will never [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can see two such articles  listed here from Lior Shamir; Recruiters your days are numbered  and the other, with a slightly different view from Adrian Kinnersley; Why Linkedin will never [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy Robin Gillman, MBA, SPHR</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/comment-page-3/#comment-83536</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Robin Gillman, MBA, SPHR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 03:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=29293#comment-83536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this started happening about 5-10 years ago.  Result: wrong people in the wrong positions resulting in dysfunctional companies and economic turmoil.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this started happening about 5-10 years ago.  Result: wrong people in the wrong positions resulting in dysfunctional companies and economic turmoil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Kolikof</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/comment-page-3/#comment-83014</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Kolikof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 00:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=29293#comment-83014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though I have not read all comments on Mr. Shamir&#039;s article, I would like to add a couple of things I don&#039;t think people mentioned. It is true; to find excellent quality talent, you must recruit passive candidates. These are people who are happy at what they do and have not made any efforts to enter the job market. So, Mr. Shamir suggests an automated system where the manager would make first contact. Managers making a cold call without a resume and intent on being recruited, except you have to convince the passive candidate to consider making a move from a job he/she enjoys to another enterprise. Do not see the skills inherent in many hiring managers. And one more thing, judgement is key as a recruiter. If I was sourcing and saw Mr. Shamir&#039;s profile, I would pass. Too many job hops the last 5-6 years. I have clients who would not consider. A software might.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though I have not read all comments on Mr. Shamir&#8217;s article, I would like to add a couple of things I don&#8217;t think people mentioned. It is true; to find excellent quality talent, you must recruit passive candidates. These are people who are happy at what they do and have not made any efforts to enter the job market. So, Mr. Shamir suggests an automated system where the manager would make first contact. Managers making a cold call without a resume and intent on being recruited, except you have to convince the passive candidate to consider making a move from a job he/she enjoys to another enterprise. Do not see the skills inherent in many hiring managers. And one more thing, judgement is key as a recruiter. If I was sourcing and saw Mr. Shamir&#8217;s profile, I would pass. Too many job hops the last 5-6 years. I have clients who would not consider. A software might.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Spiro</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/comment-page-3/#comment-82974</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Spiro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=29293#comment-82974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding Sridhar&#039;s comment:  I think recruiting is actually not so much a science as an art.  By that, I mean that subjective, people-oriented decisions made by recruiters who actually talk with and meet potential candidates often determine who best fits or doesn&#039;t fit a particular opportunity.  A person&#039;s resume (experience, skills, etc.) is only one part of the puzzle.  Matching is something best done by actual human beings -- not by computers or software.  All of those &quot;scientific&quot; tools (&quot;HRMS, HRIS, HCM, ATS&quot;) as well as Social Media sites merely gather and organize the data.  It&#039;s the fine art of interpreting that data, along with evaluating the subjective and often intangible &quot;people&quot; factors, that keeps good recruiters in business.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding Sridhar&#8217;s comment:  I think recruiting is actually not so much a science as an art.  By that, I mean that subjective, people-oriented decisions made by recruiters who actually talk with and meet potential candidates often determine who best fits or doesn&#8217;t fit a particular opportunity.  A person&#8217;s resume (experience, skills, etc.) is only one part of the puzzle.  Matching is something best done by actual human beings &#8212; not by computers or software.  All of those &#8220;scientific&#8221; tools (&#8220;HRMS, HRIS, HCM, ATS&#8221;) as well as Social Media sites merely gather and organize the data.  It&#8217;s the fine art of interpreting that data, along with evaluating the subjective and often intangible &#8220;people&#8221; factors, that keeps good recruiters in business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lior Shamir</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/comment-page-3/#comment-82969</link>
		<dc:creator>Lior Shamir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=29293#comment-82969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Sridhar - That&#039;s a poor analogy.  The barrier of entry into the recruitment profession is relatively low compared with the barrier of entry into medical science.  In practice, many managers make accurate and successful hires without the aid of a recruitment expert.  In contrast, the average person can not accurately diagnose and treat an illness (e.g. clinically assess, prescribe drugs and monitor progress).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sridhar &#8211; That&#8217;s a poor analogy.  The barrier of entry into the recruitment profession is relatively low compared with the barrier of entry into medical science.  In practice, many managers make accurate and successful hires without the aid of a recruitment expert.  In contrast, the average person can not accurately diagnose and treat an illness (e.g. clinically assess, prescribe drugs and monitor progress).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sridhar Iriventi Ism</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/comment-page-3/#comment-82941</link>
		<dc:creator>Sridhar Iriventi Ism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=29293#comment-82941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article is like saying doctors are not required as there are database of diseases, symptoms and medicines just send a query you know the cure approach or like Investment bankers are not required as analytical tools are available. Yes transactional recruiters will face a challenge. But the maze created by technology overloads of HRIS, ATS, Social networks etc can only be unknotted by minds who understand the context of  recruiting. Its a science. Lets not ignore the value of scientists because we have plethora of scientific tools.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is like saying doctors are not required as there are database of diseases, symptoms and medicines just send a query you know the cure approach or like Investment bankers are not required as analytical tools are available. Yes transactional recruiters will face a challenge. But the maze created by technology overloads of HRIS, ATS, Social networks etc can only be unknotted by minds who understand the context of  recruiting. Its a science. Lets not ignore the value of scientists because we have plethora of scientific tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn of the Passively Active Candidate &#124; ConnectedSearch</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/comment-page-3/#comment-79913</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn of the Passively Active Candidate &#124; ConnectedSearch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 02:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=29293#comment-79913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The social recruiting space is hot. Companies large (LinkedIn, Facebook) and small (Path.To, Silp) are creating products that will help you leverage your personal and professional network when searching for a job. The recruiting industry – and the methods companies are using to recruit employees – is changing more rapidly than it has since the arrival of The Monster Board in the late 1990s. It is an exciting, if not somewhat unsettling, time to be in the recruiting industry, as some are predicting the imminent demise of the agency recruiter. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The social recruiting space is hot. Companies large (LinkedIn, Facebook) and small (Path.To, Silp) are creating products that will help you leverage your personal and professional network when searching for a job. The recruiting industry – and the methods companies are using to recruit employees – is changing more rapidly than it has since the arrival of The Monster Board in the late 1990s. It is an exciting, if not somewhat unsettling, time to be in the recruiting industry, as some are predicting the imminent demise of the agency recruiter. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Halperin</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/comment-page-3/#comment-78678</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Halperin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 23:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=29293#comment-78678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Matt. Well-said. I say this more and more frequently:
I fear that the hype in recruiting will continue as long as there are slick hucksters with high-level connections ready to sell the latest recruiting snake oil or “magic bullet” to desperate and not-yet insolvent recruiters and their superiors who fail to recognize that in most cases they are futilely “rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic” of their companies’ ill-conceived, over-blown, grossly-dysfunctional hiring practices.

Cheers,

Keith]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Matt. Well-said. I say this more and more frequently:<br />
I fear that the hype in recruiting will continue as long as there are slick hucksters with high-level connections ready to sell the latest recruiting snake oil or “magic bullet” to desperate and not-yet insolvent recruiters and their superiors who fail to recognize that in most cases they are futilely “rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic” of their companies’ ill-conceived, over-blown, grossly-dysfunctional hiring practices.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Keith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Madden</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/comment-page-3/#comment-78655</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Madden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 20:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=29293#comment-78655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Couldn&#039;t agree more with Nick C&#039;s comment.  Good recruiters that last though the economic ups and downs do just that, recruit.  This latest wave of internal &#039;recruiters&#039; (btw - please...you&#039;re not even close, so stop using the title) will ease back into their HR chairs once they get over the fact that they dont run a desk anymore, and will thankfully let us do our jobs.  

ERE&#039;s been courting the HR/Internal Recruiter side of the business for years, so this guy&#039;s article shouldn&#039;t surprise anyone.  The guy before him said Monster was going to wipe us out, and he came after the guy that said the same thing about the fax machine.

If we stick to finding the candidates our clients ask us to find, we&#039;ll all be fine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more with Nick C&#8217;s comment.  Good recruiters that last though the economic ups and downs do just that, recruit.  This latest wave of internal &#8216;recruiters&#8217; (btw &#8211; please&#8230;you&#8217;re not even close, so stop using the title) will ease back into their HR chairs once they get over the fact that they dont run a desk anymore, and will thankfully let us do our jobs.  </p>
<p>ERE&#8217;s been courting the HR/Internal Recruiter side of the business for years, so this guy&#8217;s article shouldn&#8217;t surprise anyone.  The guy before him said Monster was going to wipe us out, and he came after the guy that said the same thing about the fax machine.</p>
<p>If we stick to finding the candidates our clients ask us to find, we&#8217;ll all be fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/comment-page-3/#comment-78637</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=29293#comment-78637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great reply, Keith.  My comment went a touch too far and the poem is apt.  Toning down the ire, my point is that, generally, we&#039;re too ready to offer opinions and we&#039;re over-exposed. I&#039;m not idealizing the past -- I&#039;m idealizing the distance that existed between us before technology and connectivity killed our empathy. 

I guess the proper response to Lior&#039;s post would have been to queue up an article warning that Entrepreneurs&#039; Days Are Numbered as we&#039;re all tired of all the tech startup talk and we no longer trust these bold, enterprising sorts to do anything more than apply a bit of smoke and mirrors to create the perception of value, do everything in their power to successfully launch an IPO, fleece thousands of initial investors, watch the stock tank as newly minted mill(bill)ionaires, etc, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great reply, Keith.  My comment went a touch too far and the poem is apt.  Toning down the ire, my point is that, generally, we&#8217;re too ready to offer opinions and we&#8217;re over-exposed. I&#8217;m not idealizing the past &#8212; I&#8217;m idealizing the distance that existed between us before technology and connectivity killed our empathy. </p>
<p>I guess the proper response to Lior&#8217;s post would have been to queue up an article warning that Entrepreneurs&#8217; Days Are Numbered as we&#8217;re all tired of all the tech startup talk and we no longer trust these bold, enterprising sorts to do anything more than apply a bit of smoke and mirrors to create the perception of value, do everything in their power to successfully launch an IPO, fleece thousands of initial investors, watch the stock tank as newly minted mill(bill)ionaires, etc, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Halperin</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/comment-page-3/#comment-78633</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Halperin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=29293#comment-78633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Matt: I&#039;m sorry you feel that way. &quot;Once upon a time, we lived in a pre-social-media, self-branding world where people would never dream of so brazenly commenting on something they knew little or nothing about.&quot; When and where was this &quot;Golden Age&quot; before the time when some people are saints, some are scoundrels, and most of us somewhere in between? 

As Moliere said in &quot;The Misanthrope&quot;:

PHILINTE:
Come, let&#039;s forget the follies of the times
And pardon mankind for its petty crimes;
Let&#039;s have an end of rantings and of railings,
And show some leniency toward human failings.
This world requires a pliant rectitude;
Too stern a virtue makes one stiff and rude;
Good sense views all extremes with detestation;
And bids us to be noble in moderation.
The rigid virtues of the ancient days
Are not for us; they jar with all our ways
And ask of us too lofty a perfection.
Wise men accept their times without objection,
And there&#039;s no greater folly, if you ask me,
Than trying to reform society.
Like you, I see each day a hundred and one
Unhandsome deeds that might be better done,
But still, for all the faults that meet my view,
I&#039;m never known to storm and rave like you
I take men as they are, or let them be,
And teach my soul to bear their frailty;
And whether in court or town, whatever the scene,
My phlegm&#039;s as philosophic as your spleen.&quot;

Cheers,
Keith &quot;I Should Try to Be More Like That&quot; Halperin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Matt: I&#8217;m sorry you feel that way. &#8220;Once upon a time, we lived in a pre-social-media, self-branding world where people would never dream of so brazenly commenting on something they knew little or nothing about.&#8221; When and where was this &#8220;Golden Age&#8221; before the time when some people are saints, some are scoundrels, and most of us somewhere in between? </p>
<p>As Moliere said in &#8220;The Misanthrope&#8221;:</p>
<p>PHILINTE:<br />
Come, let&#8217;s forget the follies of the times<br />
And pardon mankind for its petty crimes;<br />
Let&#8217;s have an end of rantings and of railings,<br />
And show some leniency toward human failings.<br />
This world requires a pliant rectitude;<br />
Too stern a virtue makes one stiff and rude;<br />
Good sense views all extremes with detestation;<br />
And bids us to be noble in moderation.<br />
The rigid virtues of the ancient days<br />
Are not for us; they jar with all our ways<br />
And ask of us too lofty a perfection.<br />
Wise men accept their times without objection,<br />
And there&#8217;s no greater folly, if you ask me,<br />
Than trying to reform society.<br />
Like you, I see each day a hundred and one<br />
Unhandsome deeds that might be better done,<br />
But still, for all the faults that meet my view,<br />
I&#8217;m never known to storm and rave like you<br />
I take men as they are, or let them be,<br />
And teach my soul to bear their frailty;<br />
And whether in court or town, whatever the scene,<br />
My phlegm&#8217;s as philosophic as your spleen.&#8221;</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Keith &#8220;I Should Try to Be More Like That&#8221; Halperin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/comment-page-3/#comment-78611</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=29293#comment-78611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Keith: If that&#039;s the case, I have no use for ERE.  Once upon a time, we lived in a pre-social-media, self-branding world where people would never dream of so brazenly commenting on something they knew little or nothing about.  My comment didn&#039;t stem from Lior being &quot;new to the game&quot;, it came from me being new to ERE and unaware of this particular faulty game. 

It&#039;s not at all difficult to write articles, Keith.  That&#039;s the very reason that know-nothings like Lior write them.  All you need is a cursory grasp of the English language and a void of shame to get over the fact that you&#039;re packaging useless thought as expertise. There&#039;s very little downside to writing them, too.  All you stand to expose yourself to is a bit of criticism like mine but, at the same time, you&#039;re building your brand -- which is exactly what Lior is out to do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Keith: If that&#8217;s the case, I have no use for ERE.  Once upon a time, we lived in a pre-social-media, self-branding world where people would never dream of so brazenly commenting on something they knew little or nothing about.  My comment didn&#8217;t stem from Lior being &#8220;new to the game&#8221;, it came from me being new to ERE and unaware of this particular faulty game. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not at all difficult to write articles, Keith.  That&#8217;s the very reason that know-nothings like Lior write them.  All you need is a cursory grasp of the English language and a void of shame to get over the fact that you&#8217;re packaging useless thought as expertise. There&#8217;s very little downside to writing them, too.  All you stand to expose yourself to is a bit of criticism like mine but, at the same time, you&#8217;re building your brand &#8212; which is exactly what Lior is out to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Halperin</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/comment-page-3/#comment-78544</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Halperin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 01:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=29293#comment-78544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Matt: Once again I mention- being familiar with (or better yet actually DOING) what we do isn&#039;t a requirement of writing articles here on ERE. Almost every week we get pious pronouncements, &quot;gee-whizz&quot; predictions, and self-promoting infomercials and advertorials largely from people if they ever did work as contract or corporate recruiters, haven&#039;t been for quite awhile and don&#039;t seem to have much of an understanding of the way things are for many/most of us, but by and large, we give THEM a pass... Is it because Lior is new to the game?  

Finally, all you Lior-haters: if you think it&#039;s so easy to write an article, well then YOU write one. (Notice how many articles I write? It&#039;s much easier for me to tear apart other people&#039;s articles and comments than write an article of my own....)



Keith]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Matt: Once again I mention- being familiar with (or better yet actually DOING) what we do isn&#8217;t a requirement of writing articles here on ERE. Almost every week we get pious pronouncements, &#8220;gee-whizz&#8221; predictions, and self-promoting infomercials and advertorials largely from people if they ever did work as contract or corporate recruiters, haven&#8217;t been for quite awhile and don&#8217;t seem to have much of an understanding of the way things are for many/most of us, but by and large, we give THEM a pass&#8230; Is it because Lior is new to the game?  </p>
<p>Finally, all you Lior-haters: if you think it&#8217;s so easy to write an article, well then YOU write one. (Notice how many articles I write? It&#8217;s much easier for me to tear apart other people&#8217;s articles and comments than write an article of my own&#8230;.)</p>
<p>Keith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Hoffman</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/comment-page-3/#comment-78522</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Hoffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=29293#comment-78522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lior,

I&#039;ve pasted the gist of your resume below.  What, other than a mind-blowing example of hubris, could possibly make you think you have profound thoughts to offer on anything other than promotion or self-promotion?  You&#039;ve had a 9 year career in marketing and business development.  Excuse me (and anyone else with even a slight dose of skepticism and commonsense) if I don&#039;t take your professional word for it...  

Marketing &amp; Business Development Consultant
VibeDeck
September 2010 – May 2012 (1 year 9 months)LA / London

Marketing &amp; Business Development Consultant
Audiolife
September 2009 – December 2010 (1 year 4 months)LA

Marketing Director
MyDrifts
July 2008 – May 2010 (1 year 11 months)Tel-Aviv

Content Manager
VIRV TV (RayV)
August 2007 – August 2008 (1 year 1 month)Tel-Aviv

Website Manager
We Are Listening
November 2004 – August 2008 (3 years 10 months)London]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lior,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve pasted the gist of your resume below.  What, other than a mind-blowing example of hubris, could possibly make you think you have profound thoughts to offer on anything other than promotion or self-promotion?  You&#8217;ve had a 9 year career in marketing and business development.  Excuse me (and anyone else with even a slight dose of skepticism and commonsense) if I don&#8217;t take your professional word for it&#8230;  </p>
<p>Marketing &amp; Business Development Consultant<br />
VibeDeck<br />
September 2010 – May 2012 (1 year 9 months)LA / London</p>
<p>Marketing &amp; Business Development Consultant<br />
Audiolife<br />
September 2009 – December 2010 (1 year 4 months)LA</p>
<p>Marketing Director<br />
MyDrifts<br />
July 2008 – May 2010 (1 year 11 months)Tel-Aviv</p>
<p>Content Manager<br />
VIRV TV (RayV)<br />
August 2007 – August 2008 (1 year 1 month)Tel-Aviv</p>
<p>Website Manager<br />
We Are Listening<br />
November 2004 – August 2008 (3 years 10 months)London</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Halperin</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/comment-page-3/#comment-78513</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Halperin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=29293#comment-78513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Patrick: &quot;It is shallow on the facts, ignorant of the profession and overly enamored by technology for technology’s sake.&quot;

Patrick, you just described what&#039;s in the very best tradition of most ERE articles.


Cheers,

Keith


&quot;You left out self-promoting, but that&#039;s already been covered.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Patrick: &#8220;It is shallow on the facts, ignorant of the profession and overly enamored by technology for technology’s sake.&#8221;</p>
<p>Patrick, you just described what&#8217;s in the very best tradition of most ERE articles.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Keith</p>
<p>&#8220;You left out self-promoting, but that&#8217;s already been covered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Halperin</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/comment-page-3/#comment-78512</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Halperin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=29293#comment-78512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Patrick:&quot;It is shallow on the facts, ignorant of the profession and overly enamored by technology for technology’s sake.&quot;

Patrick, what you&#039;ve described is in the *very best tradition of most ERE articles.  


Cheers,

Keith


*You left out &quot;self-promoting&quot; but that&#039;s already been covered...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Patrick:&#8221;It is shallow on the facts, ignorant of the profession and overly enamored by technology for technology’s sake.&#8221;</p>
<p>Patrick, what you&#8217;ve described is in the *very best tradition of most ERE articles.  </p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Keith</p>
<p>*You left out &#8220;self-promoting&#8221; but that&#8217;s already been covered&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Pettengill</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/comment-page-3/#comment-78504</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Pettengill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=29293#comment-78504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just posted this comment on LinkedIn and decided it would be best if I posted it here where the original posting came from:

This article strikes me as akin to a Yahoo news post. It is shallow on the facts, ignorant of the profession and overly enamored by technology for technology&#039;s sake. 

The &quot;art&quot; of recruiting is so much more than this pithy article tries to espouse. 

Recruiting is both an art and a science where professional recruiters, acting as agents for their customers, engage with, build relationships with and attract the &#039;best available&#039; talent. A good recruiter does not simply &quot;Match&quot; buzz words in a search string, they &quot;engage&quot; talent in a courtship. This courtship is two sided: The one side in support of their client&#039;s best interests and the other, in support of the candidate&#039;s career choices. 

While technology is sprouting up that allows the recruiter to more readily find, reach and engage with talent - technology CANNOT become a partner with the talent or the client. 

I have been recruiting for 33 years now and trust me - having the LinkedIn&#039;s and Jigsaw&#039;s of the world to help find and engage talent along with the likes of Bullhorn and BigBiller et al to help manage those relationships - Well, they have not only NOT put me out of business, they have made me a more productive and successful recruiter. 

Here&#039;s to technology!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just posted this comment on LinkedIn and decided it would be best if I posted it here where the original posting came from:</p>
<p>This article strikes me as akin to a Yahoo news post. It is shallow on the facts, ignorant of the profession and overly enamored by technology for technology&#8217;s sake. </p>
<p>The &#8220;art&#8221; of recruiting is so much more than this pithy article tries to espouse. </p>
<p>Recruiting is both an art and a science where professional recruiters, acting as agents for their customers, engage with, build relationships with and attract the &#8216;best available&#8217; talent. A good recruiter does not simply &#8220;Match&#8221; buzz words in a search string, they &#8220;engage&#8221; talent in a courtship. This courtship is two sided: The one side in support of their client&#8217;s best interests and the other, in support of the candidate&#8217;s career choices. </p>
<p>While technology is sprouting up that allows the recruiter to more readily find, reach and engage with talent &#8211; technology CANNOT become a partner with the talent or the client. </p>
<p>I have been recruiting for 33 years now and trust me &#8211; having the LinkedIn&#8217;s and Jigsaw&#8217;s of the world to help find and engage talent along with the likes of Bullhorn and BigBiller et al to help manage those relationships &#8211; Well, they have not only NOT put me out of business, they have made me a more productive and successful recruiter. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s to technology!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Halperin</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/comment-page-3/#comment-78408</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Halperin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 20:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=29293#comment-78408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Lisa:
With friends like recruiters, who needs enemies?  ;)

&quot;CEOs/Managers actually rely on their advisors (HR and Recruiters) to tell them which tools/apps are worthy&quot; Oh, that explains the incredible amount of terrible tools and apps which are foisted on us. I thought it was due to well-healed sales people talking to Staffing Heads (who rarely if ever seem to have to use what they&#039;re buying) into getting something with virtually no input or buy-in from those of us who actually do the recruiting work?

Trust? &quot;Trust but verify&quot;. Trust candidates to look after their own interests (just like the people at the top do), and work to make those interests coincide with what we want them to do: accept the job under our conditions.

Cheers,

Keith]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Lisa:<br />
With friends like recruiters, who needs enemies?  ;)</p>
<p>&#8220;CEOs/Managers actually rely on their advisors (HR and Recruiters) to tell them which tools/apps are worthy&#8221; Oh, that explains the incredible amount of terrible tools and apps which are foisted on us. I thought it was due to well-healed sales people talking to Staffing Heads (who rarely if ever seem to have to use what they&#8217;re buying) into getting something with virtually no input or buy-in from those of us who actually do the recruiting work?</p>
<p>Trust? &#8220;Trust but verify&#8221;. Trust candidates to look after their own interests (just like the people at the top do), and work to make those interests coincide with what we want them to do: accept the job under our conditions.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Keith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Halperin</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/12/10/recruiters-your-days-are-numbered/comment-page-3/#comment-78407</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Halperin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 20:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=29293#comment-78407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Lisa:
With friends like recruiters, who needs enemies?  ;)

&quot;CEOs/Managers actually rely on their advisors (HR and Recruiters) to tell them which tools/apps are worthy&quot; Oh, that explains the incredible amount of terrible tools and apps which are foisted on us. I thought it was due to well-healed sales people talking to Staffing Heads (who rarely if ever seem to have to use what they&#039;re buying) into getting something with virtually no input or buy-in from those of us who actually do the recruiting work.

Trust? &quot;Trust but verify&quot;. Trust candidates to look after their own interests (just like the people at the top do), and work to make those interests coincide with what we want them to do: accept the job under our conditions.

Cheers,

Keith keithsrj@sbcglobal.net]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Lisa:<br />
With friends like recruiters, who needs enemies?  ;)</p>
<p>&#8220;CEOs/Managers actually rely on their advisors (HR and Recruiters) to tell them which tools/apps are worthy&#8221; Oh, that explains the incredible amount of terrible tools and apps which are foisted on us. I thought it was due to well-healed sales people talking to Staffing Heads (who rarely if ever seem to have to use what they&#8217;re buying) into getting something with virtually no input or buy-in from those of us who actually do the recruiting work.</p>
<p>Trust? &#8220;Trust but verify&#8221;. Trust candidates to look after their own interests (just like the people at the top do), and work to make those interests coincide with what we want them to do: accept the job under our conditions.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Keith <a href="mailto:keithsrj@sbcglobal.net">keithsrj@sbcglobal.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
