<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Single Most Important Recruiting Technique Since My 1-Question Interview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ere.net/2012/08/24/my-single-most-important-recruiting-technique-since-my-1-question-interview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/08/24/my-single-most-important-recruiting-technique-since-my-1-question-interview/</link>
	<description>Recruiting News, Recruiting Events, Recruiting Community, Social Recruiting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:32:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Adler</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/08/24/my-single-most-important-recruiting-technique-since-my-1-question-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-67868</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Adler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=27416#comment-67868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[of course, you can do everything mentioned without LinkedIn Recruiter - but why would you? In my mind the cost is insignificant compared to the benefits. What normally takes 8-10 days to put together a list of pre-qualified and interested passive candidates can now be done in 1-2 days with LinkedIn Recruiter. This equates to at least 10-20 more placements per year just from from a productivity standpoint, so I&#039;m willing to make the investment. Even better, by speeding up the process Quality of Hire can be the driving metric not time, so managers don&#039;t ever become pushed to make a short-term decision. And since time to fill is shortened by 50% cost per hire also drops. It&#039;s pretty clear that true cost/hire is a function of time to fill when opportunity costs are taken into account. There are new ways to do things, some good, some fleeting. As far as I&#039;m concerned LinkedIn Recruiter is a must have on all fronts. Recruiters who don&#039;t get onboard will sing a song that it&#039;s not needed, but that&#039;s what the buggy makers said long ago. History does repeat itself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course, you can do everything mentioned without LinkedIn Recruiter &#8211; but why would you? In my mind the cost is insignificant compared to the benefits. What normally takes 8-10 days to put together a list of pre-qualified and interested passive candidates can now be done in 1-2 days with LinkedIn Recruiter. This equates to at least 10-20 more placements per year just from from a productivity standpoint, so I&#8217;m willing to make the investment. Even better, by speeding up the process Quality of Hire can be the driving metric not time, so managers don&#8217;t ever become pushed to make a short-term decision. And since time to fill is shortened by 50% cost per hire also drops. It&#8217;s pretty clear that true cost/hire is a function of time to fill when opportunity costs are taken into account. There are new ways to do things, some good, some fleeting. As far as I&#8217;m concerned LinkedIn Recruiter is a must have on all fronts. Recruiters who don&#8217;t get onboard will sing a song that it&#8217;s not needed, but that&#8217;s what the buggy makers said long ago. History does repeat itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Tseko</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/08/24/my-single-most-important-recruiting-technique-since-my-1-question-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-67866</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Tseko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=27416#comment-67866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lou, another great article. It seems, though, that a lot of your success depends on LinkedIn. Not everybody uses LinkedIn or has a LinkedIn Recruiter account and quite frankly you don&#039;t absolutely need it to be a successful recruiter (I prove that over and over again).

What did you do before LinkedIn? THOSE are the stories and techniques I want to hear about!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lou, another great article. It seems, though, that a lot of your success depends on LinkedIn. Not everybody uses LinkedIn or has a LinkedIn Recruiter account and quite frankly you don&#8217;t absolutely need it to be a successful recruiter (I prove that over and over again).</p>
<p>What did you do before LinkedIn? THOSE are the stories and techniques I want to hear about!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Single Most Important Recruiting Technique Since My 1-Question Interview &#171; interviewmocha</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/08/24/my-single-most-important-recruiting-technique-since-my-1-question-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-67758</link>
		<dc:creator>The Single Most Important Recruiting Technique Since My 1-Question Interview &#171; interviewmocha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 07:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=27416#comment-67758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Click here for detailed news.    On August 27, 2012  &#160; / &#160; Recruitment &#160; / &#160; Leave a comment [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click here for detailed news.    On August 27, 2012  &nbsp; / &nbsp; Recruitment &nbsp; / &nbsp; Leave a comment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Halperin</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/08/24/my-single-most-important-recruiting-technique-since-my-1-question-interview/comment-page-1/#comment-67681</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Halperin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 00:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=27416#comment-67681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Lou. This is sensible,&quot;back-to-basics&quot; recruiting, which isn&#039;t given as much attention as it should.

Have a Great Weekend,

Keith]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Lou. This is sensible,&#8221;back-to-basics&#8221; recruiting, which isn&#8217;t given as much attention as it should.</p>
<p>Have a Great Weekend,</p>
<p>Keith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
