<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Death of Superlatives in Job Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ere.net/2012/07/31/the-death-of-superlatives-in-job-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/07/31/the-death-of-superlatives-in-job-ads/</link>
	<description>Recruiting News, Recruiting Events, Recruiting Community, Social Recruiting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:34:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Structure of Your Job Ad Plays a Bigger Role Than You Think - ERE.net</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/07/31/the-death-of-superlatives-in-job-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-87675</link>
		<dc:creator>The Structure of Your Job Ad Plays a Bigger Role Than You Think - ERE.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 23:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=27015#comment-87675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] We spent the first few weeks of January doing a complete overhaul of our ads, explaining the importance of SEO, working out an ad template, and removing any usage of superlatives in job titles. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We spent the first few weeks of January doing a complete overhaul of our ads, explaining the importance of SEO, working out an ad template, and removing any usage of superlatives in job titles. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeannette Wassmuth</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/07/31/the-death-of-superlatives-in-job-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-77243</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeannette Wassmuth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=27015#comment-77243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with you Justin... In searching for jobs the titles need to be relevant to the job.  Too many wordy superlatives can lead to the job not being found and bad SEO and EOI.  It is also a good idea to put as much information about what the job entails and what qualifications are nececssary in the description of the job.  This isnt to say that it cant be cleverly written so as to keep interest or to put your company in the best light.  By all means spin it to show your best side.  But keep it relevant.  People are busy and want to get to the root of things, learn what is important and know how to get more information if it fits them.  Key words that are specific to the job function are important.  Great points!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Justin&#8230; In searching for jobs the titles need to be relevant to the job.  Too many wordy superlatives can lead to the job not being found and bad SEO and EOI.  It is also a good idea to put as much information about what the job entails and what qualifications are nececssary in the description of the job.  This isnt to say that it cant be cleverly written so as to keep interest or to put your company in the best light.  By all means spin it to show your best side.  But keep it relevant.  People are busy and want to get to the root of things, learn what is important and know how to get more information if it fits them.  Key words that are specific to the job function are important.  Great points!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What does your desired candidate really want? &#171; SmashFly Recruitment Marketing Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/07/31/the-death-of-superlatives-in-job-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-67662</link>
		<dc:creator>What does your desired candidate really want? &#171; SmashFly Recruitment Marketing Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=27015#comment-67662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] or what drives them but also key terms for messaging.  Justing Miller wrote a nice piece on the use of RockStar for programmers in job ads.  Things like this are great to ask your programming talent to gauge how you can best present your [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or what drives them but also key terms for messaging.  Justing Miller wrote a nice piece on the use of RockStar for programmers in job ads.  Things like this are great to ask your programming talent to gauge how you can best present your [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 Best Recruitment Marketing Articles of the Week 7.28.12 to 8.3.12 &#171; SmashFly Recruitment Marketing Technology Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/07/31/the-death-of-superlatives-in-job-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-66683</link>
		<dc:creator>5 Best Recruitment Marketing Articles of the Week 7.28.12 to 8.3.12 &#171; SmashFly Recruitment Marketing Technology Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 14:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=27015#comment-66683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Death of Superlatives in Job Ads by Justin Miller (@TweetsByJMiller) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Death of Superlatives in Job Ads by Justin Miller (@TweetsByJMiller) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul M</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/07/31/the-death-of-superlatives-in-job-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-66601</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 12:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=27015#comment-66601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article.

The same can be said when constructing a resume. 

When searching for candidates online, &#039;Rockstar&#039; and other overly and incorrectly descritive key words are never typed into a candidate search engine. Similarly, Words like &#039;passionate&#039;, &#039;hard-working&#039;, &#039;leader&#039;, &#039;mentor&#039; and many others in this strain are not on top of any search keyword list.  

With this in mind, writing a resume should be conducted with the job you are aiming for in mind. Think about how a recruiter  would conduct a keyword search on you and make sure you have SEO optimised your resume.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.</p>
<p>The same can be said when constructing a resume. </p>
<p>When searching for candidates online, &#8216;Rockstar&#8217; and other overly and incorrectly descritive key words are never typed into a candidate search engine. Similarly, Words like &#8216;passionate&#8217;, &#8216;hard-working&#8217;, &#8216;leader&#8217;, &#8216;mentor&#8217; and many others in this strain are not on top of any search keyword list.  </p>
<p>With this in mind, writing a resume should be conducted with the job you are aiming for in mind. Think about how a recruiter  would conduct a keyword search on you and make sure you have SEO optimised your resume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Slezak</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/07/31/the-death-of-superlatives-in-job-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-66579</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Slezak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2012 03:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=27015#comment-66579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a great article. Even before the invention of search engines, whenever I trained consultants in the fine art of copywriting for recruitment advertising, I always stressed how important it is never to mislead or deceive the reader by exaggerating the level of the role or job title (which often came about through superlatives or a string of exclamation marks). This article adds another important layer on top of that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great article. Even before the invention of search engines, whenever I trained consultants in the fine art of copywriting for recruitment advertising, I always stressed how important it is never to mislead or deceive the reader by exaggerating the level of the role or job title (which often came about through superlatives or a string of exclamation marks). This article adds another important layer on top of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Halperin</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/07/31/the-death-of-superlatives-in-job-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-66530</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Halperin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=27015#comment-66530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ George. Well put. 
IMHO, putting out lots of salesy/markety superlative-hype is a good test of your postings. Anyone who responds non-ironically to them is quite possibly too ignorant, too stupid, or too desperate to be the kind of people you want, but are likely to be the only people you&#039;ll be able to get....

Saw a good idea online, maybe it was here on ERE:
Marketing’s job is to turn ordinary crap into World-Class BS (like much of what we see here on ERE), so companies should give Marketing the basic information, and then have them write the JDs- They might be interesting, they should be in some form of English, and they might even have an element of fact in them, too.

Cheers,

Keith keithsrj@sbcglobal.net]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ George. Well put.<br />
IMHO, putting out lots of salesy/markety superlative-hype is a good test of your postings. Anyone who responds non-ironically to them is quite possibly too ignorant, too stupid, or too desperate to be the kind of people you want, but are likely to be the only people you&#8217;ll be able to get&#8230;.</p>
<p>Saw a good idea online, maybe it was here on ERE:<br />
Marketing’s job is to turn ordinary crap into World-Class BS (like much of what we see here on ERE), so companies should give Marketing the basic information, and then have them write the JDs- They might be interesting, they should be in some form of English, and they might even have an element of fact in them, too.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Keith <a href="mailto:keithsrj@sbcglobal.net">keithsrj@sbcglobal.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/07/31/the-death-of-superlatives-in-job-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-66519</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=27015#comment-66519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great to hear. Thanks Michael!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to hear. Thanks Michael!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/07/31/the-death-of-superlatives-in-job-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-66516</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 16:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=27015#comment-66516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great points Justin!  I have always believed that the title must be easy to find vs. having some catch phrase.  All job seekers believe they are rock stars.  I like to always remember that Simplicity is Genius.  We too have just went through our job titles in the Manufacturing segment of our business.  Seeing good results!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points Justin!  I have always believed that the title must be easy to find vs. having some catch phrase.  All job seekers believe they are rock stars.  I like to always remember that Simplicity is Genius.  We too have just went through our job titles in the Manufacturing segment of our business.  Seeing good results!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aimee Fahey</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/07/31/the-death-of-superlatives-in-job-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-66512</link>
		<dc:creator>Aimee Fahey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=27015#comment-66512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The irony about the superlatives is that, because everyone is using them, they are no longer effective.  The term &#039;ninja&#039; in a job ad, if it doesn&#039;t actually have to do with martial arts, is incredibly irritable.  Most job seekers want to know what the job is and what your company does - one of my clients, for example, is in photography software.  I want people who think what my client does is cool so I refer to this in the ads.  Too much fluff in ads is annoying and, with the cynicism out there (especially in tech), having a personality in your ads is fine but make sure ultimately they can quickly and easily know what the job entails &amp; requires.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The irony about the superlatives is that, because everyone is using them, they are no longer effective.  The term &#8216;ninja&#8217; in a job ad, if it doesn&#8217;t actually have to do with martial arts, is incredibly irritable.  Most job seekers want to know what the job is and what your company does &#8211; one of my clients, for example, is in photography software.  I want people who think what my client does is cool so I refer to this in the ads.  Too much fluff in ads is annoying and, with the cynicism out there (especially in tech), having a personality in your ads is fine but make sure ultimately they can quickly and easily know what the job entails &amp; requires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Blomgren</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/07/31/the-death-of-superlatives-in-job-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-66510</link>
		<dc:creator>George Blomgren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=27015#comment-66510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s questionable to generalize feedback from IT professionals on this matter. They tend to be sophisticated, exceptionally intelligent candidates who have been pandered to (the good ones anyway) even through a rough employment market. I think candidates for other types of jobs may be a lot more impressed and motivated by job postings that actually attempt to be something more than job descriptions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s questionable to generalize feedback from IT professionals on this matter. They tend to be sophisticated, exceptionally intelligent candidates who have been pandered to (the good ones anyway) even through a rough employment market. I think candidates for other types of jobs may be a lot more impressed and motivated by job postings that actually attempt to be something more than job descriptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff (Jeffrey) Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/07/31/the-death-of-superlatives-in-job-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-66508</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff (Jeffrey) Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=27015#comment-66508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article touches on something I&#039;ve been very curious about: with all the discussions in the recruiting world about sources for candidates, search engines (namely Google) are rarely mentioned. However, we know on our SEO friendly job board, about 20% of all page (job) views show Google as the referring source. In other words, it would seem many job seekers are using Google as their go to search tool but that fact seems to rarely be discussed or studied. 

On the flip side, I have seen titles that provide a different twist, or even simple additional information, get viewed more often than a &quot;bland&quot; job title. For example, one employer who was getting low response to an ad titled &quot;Inside Sales&quot; embellished it to &quot;Inside Sales – Family-owned, great work/life balance!&quot; After the change, they saw the views increase more than two fold. 

The balancing act, it would seem, is to assure the title is search engine friendly while seeing to it that when a job seeker sees 10 nearly identical ads, yours is the most interesting and thus the first one to get clicked on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article touches on something I&#8217;ve been very curious about: with all the discussions in the recruiting world about sources for candidates, search engines (namely Google) are rarely mentioned. However, we know on our SEO friendly job board, about 20% of all page (job) views show Google as the referring source. In other words, it would seem many job seekers are using Google as their go to search tool but that fact seems to rarely be discussed or studied. </p>
<p>On the flip side, I have seen titles that provide a different twist, or even simple additional information, get viewed more often than a &#8220;bland&#8221; job title. For example, one employer who was getting low response to an ad titled &#8220;Inside Sales&#8221; embellished it to &#8220;Inside Sales – Family-owned, great work/life balance!&#8221; After the change, they saw the views increase more than two fold. </p>
<p>The balancing act, it would seem, is to assure the title is search engine friendly while seeing to it that when a job seeker sees 10 nearly identical ads, yours is the most interesting and thus the first one to get clicked on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/07/31/the-death-of-superlatives-in-job-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-66507</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=27015#comment-66507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Barbara! You&#039;ll have to check back with us and let us know the results you saw from your tweaks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Barbara! You&#8217;ll have to check back with us and let us know the results you saw from your tweaks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Bunting</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/07/31/the-death-of-superlatives-in-job-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-66505</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Bunting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=27015#comment-66505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wonderful article.  We have just gone through a complete overhaul of our job titles and have seen the increased exposure on the web.  We have managed to take out all the &quot;excellent&quot; and &quot;experienced&quot; in the job titles as well:-)  Now we just have the actual title to increase the SEO.

Very relevant thank you!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful article.  We have just gone through a complete overhaul of our job titles and have seen the increased exposure on the web.  We have managed to take out all the &#8220;excellent&#8221; and &#8220;experienced&#8221; in the job titles as well:-)  Now we just have the actual title to increase the SEO.</p>
<p>Very relevant thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/07/31/the-death-of-superlatives-in-job-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-66503</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=27015#comment-66503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Steven

All good points!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Steven</p>
<p>All good points!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Rothberg</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/07/31/the-death-of-superlatives-in-job-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-66502</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Rothberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=27015#comment-66502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent advice, Justin. 

It is too bad that so few people who post jobs to Monster, Careerbuilder, or even a niche board like our CollegeRecruiter.com understand the basics of search engine optimization (SEO). If they did, the vast majority would likely take the extra minute or two to craft an SEO-friendly job title. More than anything else, that job title determines the success or failure the posting because your job can be the greatest in the world but if no one sees it, no one will apply to it.

The jobs which tend to underperform on our site are those which use internal jargon in the job title, such as SE2 instead of Software Engineer II. I doubt that very many software engineers are going to search Google, Bing, or a job board using the keyword &quot;SE2&quot; but you can bet that they will search using the keyword phrase &quot;software engineer.&quot; It is likely that the SE2 job will come up in the search results as the recruiter likely included &quot;software engineer&quot; in the job description, job requirements, or education requirements fields but the search engines place much greater emphasis on page titles / job titles than they do on the paragraphs of information on those pages.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent advice, Justin. </p>
<p>It is too bad that so few people who post jobs to Monster, Careerbuilder, or even a niche board like our CollegeRecruiter.com understand the basics of search engine optimization (SEO). If they did, the vast majority would likely take the extra minute or two to craft an SEO-friendly job title. More than anything else, that job title determines the success or failure the posting because your job can be the greatest in the world but if no one sees it, no one will apply to it.</p>
<p>The jobs which tend to underperform on our site are those which use internal jargon in the job title, such as SE2 instead of Software Engineer II. I doubt that very many software engineers are going to search Google, Bing, or a job board using the keyword &#8220;SE2&#8243; but you can bet that they will search using the keyword phrase &#8220;software engineer.&#8221; It is likely that the SE2 job will come up in the search results as the recruiter likely included &#8220;software engineer&#8221; in the job description, job requirements, or education requirements fields but the search engines place much greater emphasis on page titles / job titles than they do on the paragraphs of information on those pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
