<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Death of the Cubicle &#8212; and the Killers Are Collaboration and Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/</link>
	<description>Recruiting News, Recruiting Events, Recruiting Community, Social Recruiting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 03:38:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is a Cubicle or Open Layout Best For Your Business? -Office Suites PLUS</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-97575</link>
		<dc:creator>Is a Cubicle or Open Layout Best For Your Business? -Office Suites PLUS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=25594#comment-97575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] key. If employees tend to work together in groups, an open floor plan is likely your best bet. The lack of partitions facilitates communication, since employees don’t have to get up and duck around a cubicle to share an idea or ask a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] key. If employees tend to work together in groups, an open floor plan is likely your best bet. The lack of partitions facilitates communication, since employees don’t have to get up and duck around a cubicle to share an idea or ask a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omar Hussain</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-75438</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Hussain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 22:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=25594#comment-75438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think workers spend too much time talking to eachother as it is, and not enough time working.  All this &quot;collaboration&quot; and discovery sounds great, but just how many new ideas are people coming up with in a day?  When is there time to actually sit down and code something and get stuff done?  
No wonder Google and Facebook have so many software engineers on staff, they need all those people just to get anything done, because the rest of the time they&#039;re jogging or having fun?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think workers spend too much time talking to eachother as it is, and not enough time working.  All this &#8220;collaboration&#8221; and discovery sounds great, but just how many new ideas are people coming up with in a day?  When is there time to actually sit down and code something and get stuff done?<br />
No wonder Google and Facebook have so many software engineers on staff, they need all those people just to get anything done, because the rest of the time they&#8217;re jogging or having fun?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collaboration and Group Think: Stand and Work &#124; QuinnCreative</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-68267</link>
		<dc:creator>Collaboration and Group Think: Stand and Work &#124; QuinnCreative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 07:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=25594#comment-68267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] drive toward open-workspace-as-creativity booster. I just don&#8217;t believe it. Here&#8217;s what Dr. John Sullivan says about less privacy and more creativity: Obviously without partitions separating employees, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] drive toward open-workspace-as-creativity booster. I just don&#8217;t believe it. Here&#8217;s what Dr. John Sullivan says about less privacy and more creativity: Obviously without partitions separating employees, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula Filseth</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-66344</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Filseth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 00:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=25594#comment-66344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just had to comment on this ...

I worked in an open-environment office 8 or 10 years ago.  It was a complete and total nightmare, and it led to massive workplace dissatisfaction amongst a very unhappy workforce.  It is disheartening to see this trend being pushed so hard by &quot;design&quot; firms with a clear financial interest in getting companies to pay them to create these allegedly more &quot;innovative&quot; and &quot;collaborative&quot; environments.

Many of the points have already been made, but I&#039;ll reiterate them from my own experience ... the worst problem was the noise, followed very closely by constant visual distractions.  Nor was the noise a result of excessive personal calls ... continuous work-related conversations can be just as disruptive to another person&#039;s ability to concentrate on his or her own job.

Collaboration is frequently heralded as the reason to switch to this sort of office arrangement, but I believe this supposed benefit is vastly over-predicted and over-rated.  The people at my company who needed to work with one another had already been doing so before the change, meeting in one another&#039;s cubicles or using larger conference rooms when needed for bigger meetings.  This didn&#039;t change with the workplace redesign.  The only thing that changed was that the &quot;in-cubicle&quot; meetings became much noisier and more disruptive to workers around them.  Interruptions were constant.  As a writer, I desperately need quiet to focus ... but with the redesign, I found my computer on a desk top sitting catty-corner to those of three other people.  One of these listened to loud rock music through his headphones 8 to 10 hours a day, and sitting where I was (just a few feet away), I endured a constant low-grade buzz and beat (as well as the visual distraction of his head bobbing in time).   I often found myself six or seven hours into the day with barely a dent made in the work I needed to get done and almost in tears from frustration ... between the constant interruptions and distractions, I found myself having to take home work every day and work another three or four hours into the wee hours.

The demand on conference rooms was enormous ... and not just for meetings; employees desperate for a quiet space to concentrate on their work signed up for even a half hour here or there wherever they could.  This led to even more impromptu &quot;collaborative&quot; meetings in the open space.  It was a vicious, unending cycle.

Another issue that I rarely see mentioned at all, but which was a very big problem for me and a number of others, was a constant, visceral feeling of unease and unhappiness stemming from being constantly visually &quot;exposed.&quot;  If you are the sort of person who feels most comfortable sitting with your back to the nearest wall and facing into a crowded room, you know what I&#039;m talking about ... you&#039;re sure to feel a constant, nerve-jangling distress if your new workspace places you in the middle of a very open room.  It&#039;s an exhausting kind of claustrophobia ... the sort of stressful feeling I most associate with waiting at a crowded airport gate for several hours, sitting cheek to jowl with equally stressed strangers.  In the end, the working environment made me so miserable that I had to quit.  

I&#039;m at a loss to explain how corporate execs can imagine this sort of environment is in any way conducive to collaboration, innovation, or efficiency.  It is worth noting that in the case of the company where I experienced this setup, the execs who made the decision to design this &quot;open&quot; and &quot;collaborative&quot; workspace all maintained private offices (with doors and walls) for themselves.  I think that pretty much says it all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just had to comment on this &#8230;</p>
<p>I worked in an open-environment office 8 or 10 years ago.  It was a complete and total nightmare, and it led to massive workplace dissatisfaction amongst a very unhappy workforce.  It is disheartening to see this trend being pushed so hard by &#8220;design&#8221; firms with a clear financial interest in getting companies to pay them to create these allegedly more &#8220;innovative&#8221; and &#8220;collaborative&#8221; environments.</p>
<p>Many of the points have already been made, but I&#8217;ll reiterate them from my own experience &#8230; the worst problem was the noise, followed very closely by constant visual distractions.  Nor was the noise a result of excessive personal calls &#8230; continuous work-related conversations can be just as disruptive to another person&#8217;s ability to concentrate on his or her own job.</p>
<p>Collaboration is frequently heralded as the reason to switch to this sort of office arrangement, but I believe this supposed benefit is vastly over-predicted and over-rated.  The people at my company who needed to work with one another had already been doing so before the change, meeting in one another&#8217;s cubicles or using larger conference rooms when needed for bigger meetings.  This didn&#8217;t change with the workplace redesign.  The only thing that changed was that the &#8220;in-cubicle&#8221; meetings became much noisier and more disruptive to workers around them.  Interruptions were constant.  As a writer, I desperately need quiet to focus &#8230; but with the redesign, I found my computer on a desk top sitting catty-corner to those of three other people.  One of these listened to loud rock music through his headphones 8 to 10 hours a day, and sitting where I was (just a few feet away), I endured a constant low-grade buzz and beat (as well as the visual distraction of his head bobbing in time).   I often found myself six or seven hours into the day with barely a dent made in the work I needed to get done and almost in tears from frustration &#8230; between the constant interruptions and distractions, I found myself having to take home work every day and work another three or four hours into the wee hours.</p>
<p>The demand on conference rooms was enormous &#8230; and not just for meetings; employees desperate for a quiet space to concentrate on their work signed up for even a half hour here or there wherever they could.  This led to even more impromptu &#8220;collaborative&#8221; meetings in the open space.  It was a vicious, unending cycle.</p>
<p>Another issue that I rarely see mentioned at all, but which was a very big problem for me and a number of others, was a constant, visceral feeling of unease and unhappiness stemming from being constantly visually &#8220;exposed.&#8221;  If you are the sort of person who feels most comfortable sitting with your back to the nearest wall and facing into a crowded room, you know what I&#8217;m talking about &#8230; you&#8217;re sure to feel a constant, nerve-jangling distress if your new workspace places you in the middle of a very open room.  It&#8217;s an exhausting kind of claustrophobia &#8230; the sort of stressful feeling I most associate with waiting at a crowded airport gate for several hours, sitting cheek to jowl with equally stressed strangers.  In the end, the working environment made me so miserable that I had to quit.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m at a loss to explain how corporate execs can imagine this sort of environment is in any way conducive to collaboration, innovation, or efficiency.  It is worth noting that in the case of the company where I experienced this setup, the execs who made the decision to design this &#8220;open&#8221; and &#8220;collaborative&#8221; workspace all maintained private offices (with doors and walls) for themselves.  I think that pretty much says it all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: “HR, Tear Down Those Walls”… and Increase Decision-Making Speed By 45% - ERE.net</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-65567</link>
		<dc:creator>“HR, Tear Down Those Walls”… and Increase Decision-Making Speed By 45% - ERE.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 09:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=25594#comment-65567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] space on productivity, collaboration, and innovation. I recently completed a major piece on &#8220;the death of the cubicle.&#8221; If you&#8217;re not familiar with it, an open space work environment is designed to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] space on productivity, collaboration, and innovation. I recently completed a major piece on &#8220;the death of the cubicle.&#8221; If you&#8217;re not familiar with it, an open space work environment is designed to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More on the vanishing cubicle: is it a good thing? &#124; Workforce Watercooler</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-65259</link>
		<dc:creator>More on the vanishing cubicle: is it a good thing? &#124; Workforce Watercooler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 15:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=25594#comment-65259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] recently wrote on the vanishing cubicle.  Then we came across this article that focuses on perhaps the best reasons for the gradual disappearing of the cubicle – [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently wrote on the vanishing cubicle.  Then we came across this article that focuses on perhaps the best reasons for the gradual disappearing of the cubicle – [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HR Blogposts der Woche 21/2012 &#124; HR Software Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-64496</link>
		<dc:creator>HR Blogposts der Woche 21/2012 &#124; HR Software Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 10:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=25594#comment-64496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] immer wichtiger und in einem großen, offenen Raum gelingt das besser. Mehr zum Thema gibt es bei ERE. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] immer wichtiger und in einem großen, offenen Raum gelingt das besser. Mehr zum Thema gibt es bei ERE. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Halperin</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-64486</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Halperin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 20:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=25594#comment-64486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Scott. You made a good point. Personally, I think instead of working toward a fun, no-boundaries, 24/7/365 mixed work/play environment, we should be more like the Germans, who work fewer but more focused work hours and then go on with the rest of their lives OUTSIDE of work.

Cheers,

Keith]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Scott. You made a good point. Personally, I think instead of working toward a fun, no-boundaries, 24/7/365 mixed work/play environment, we should be more like the Germans, who work fewer but more focused work hours and then go on with the rest of their lives OUTSIDE of work.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Keith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Weaver</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-64463</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Weaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 22:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=25594#comment-64463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its interesting to see everyone&#039;s thoughts. In our HQ, we moved office space from a suite that had an individual office for each person to currently operating in the &quot;open plan&quot;. Its been met with mixed reviews. We have 2 open spaces or &quot;bull-pens&quot;, about 30 squares with no walls that everyone operates their work day within, 3 closed offices with window walls (for CEO, COO, and VP of HR), 1 large conference room, 1 small &quot;meeting room&quot;, and 2 travel/swing spaces when absolute privacy may be needed. Additionally, we have a large break room w/ tables, TV (premium package so everyone can watch whatever sporting event), and a patio outside. 

It is interesting to witness. We&#039;re a professional consulting firm w/ a laid back atmosphere. Many are so quiet on the phone that its actually more silent then it may have been in the past. On the other hand, there are certain times in the day when it gets pretty busy and people are joking all around the office. The company also bought bose head-sets for everyone so they could listen to music during the day. 

My point is: I think the jury is still out on whether or not it creates more productivity and I&#039;m sure it depends on the type of business you run. Regardless, it does create some fun times.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its interesting to see everyone&#8217;s thoughts. In our HQ, we moved office space from a suite that had an individual office for each person to currently operating in the &#8220;open plan&#8221;. Its been met with mixed reviews. We have 2 open spaces or &#8220;bull-pens&#8221;, about 30 squares with no walls that everyone operates their work day within, 3 closed offices with window walls (for CEO, COO, and VP of HR), 1 large conference room, 1 small &#8220;meeting room&#8221;, and 2 travel/swing spaces when absolute privacy may be needed. Additionally, we have a large break room w/ tables, TV (premium package so everyone can watch whatever sporting event), and a patio outside. </p>
<p>It is interesting to witness. We&#8217;re a professional consulting firm w/ a laid back atmosphere. Many are so quiet on the phone that its actually more silent then it may have been in the past. On the other hand, there are certain times in the day when it gets pretty busy and people are joking all around the office. The company also bought bose head-sets for everyone so they could listen to music during the day. </p>
<p>My point is: I think the jury is still out on whether or not it creates more productivity and I&#8217;m sure it depends on the type of business you run. Regardless, it does create some fun times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Halperin</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-64458</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Halperin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=25594#comment-64458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Michael, Bree, Peter, Sunaina: Well said. 

I think it ironic that this is taking place in IT-related companies. These companies have high proportions of folks with Asperger&#039;s in them, and to many Aspers: an environment like this would be hell.

A question: who actually would like to work in an environment like this- not folks who think people should work in an environment like this, but people who would actually prefer it?
I assume there are a number, and I would guess they are predominantly younger and extroverted. 

Cheers,
Keith]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael, Bree, Peter, Sunaina: Well said. </p>
<p>I think it ironic that this is taking place in IT-related companies. These companies have high proportions of folks with Asperger&#8217;s in them, and to many Aspers: an environment like this would be hell.</p>
<p>A question: who actually would like to work in an environment like this- not folks who think people should work in an environment like this, but people who would actually prefer it?<br />
I assume there are a number, and I would guess they are predominantly younger and extroverted. </p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Keith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunaina khanna</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-64456</link>
		<dc:creator>sunaina khanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 13:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=25594#comment-64456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love the underlying excitement in this article. However, the open space leads innovation and collaboration cannot be applied as a general rule across board. I work for a non profit organization of about 40 employees. We all are compartmentalized with no intercations for days with one another- just work on our individual areas of expertise. Initialliy i tried to break this dichotomy by presenting ans sharing ideas ... which fails to work. There are other factors wich hinder innovation even if you go totally open.... POLITICS at work. No matter how open the floor plan is.. politics and power game kills all innovation and collaboration.Collaboration happens only at levels where there is no threat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the underlying excitement in this article. However, the open space leads innovation and collaboration cannot be applied as a general rule across board. I work for a non profit organization of about 40 employees. We all are compartmentalized with no intercations for days with one another- just work on our individual areas of expertise. Initialliy i tried to break this dichotomy by presenting ans sharing ideas &#8230; which fails to work. There are other factors wich hinder innovation even if you go totally open&#8230;. POLITICS at work. No matter how open the floor plan is.. politics and power game kills all innovation and collaboration.Collaboration happens only at levels where there is no threat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Macdonald</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-64451</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Macdonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 10:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=25594#comment-64451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[May I remind those of us old enough to remember the failed experiment of &quot;open Space&quot; classrooms, all following the theories of one female teacher who later admitted she was wrong. A generation of reduced learning outcomes due to the noise and interruption factor especially for those students who are easily distracted. Well those same distracted kids are now working in an open space next to you! 
My observation of some early applicators of this approach convinced me it was all about not letting employees hide and therefore an attempt to make them only do work at work. In fact employees seen hanging around anothers workstation were often counselled as to why they weren&#039;t working. 
This is just another example of the wheel turning in a circle. Remember the typing pools of the 1950&#039; - all open space!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May I remind those of us old enough to remember the failed experiment of &#8220;open Space&#8221; classrooms, all following the theories of one female teacher who later admitted she was wrong. A generation of reduced learning outcomes due to the noise and interruption factor especially for those students who are easily distracted. Well those same distracted kids are now working in an open space next to you!<br />
My observation of some early applicators of this approach convinced me it was all about not letting employees hide and therefore an attempt to make them only do work at work. In fact employees seen hanging around anothers workstation were often counselled as to why they weren&#8217;t working.<br />
This is just another example of the wheel turning in a circle. Remember the typing pools of the 1950&#8242; &#8211; all open space!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bree J</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-64437</link>
		<dc:creator>Bree J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 03:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=25594#comment-64437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you Michael Glenn, I agree with everything you&#039;ve said. Creative collaboration &amp; creativity are great sounding buzz words. But everyone knows the most creative innovators are people who need to CONCENTRATE on producing things. Periods of intense concentration that is needed is not fostered in these ghastly noise &amp; interruption ridden work places. I&#039;ve experienced first hand how extremely difficult it is to work when people are always approaching at you with their nonsense. 

The recruitment industry seems to operate on this myth that people need endless noise &amp; distractions in order to stay motivated &amp; to achieve more. But in these type of offices, the exact opposite occurs. We all know how poisonous negative employee&#039;s morale can be to the team. Well guess what? When you are constantly exposed to them every minute of your work day - you are a sitting duck. Who wonders why at the end of each day why they didn&#039;t achieve as much as they expected &amp; vows to make up for it tomorrow, and then the next day &amp; the next.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Michael Glenn, I agree with everything you&#8217;ve said. Creative collaboration &amp; creativity are great sounding buzz words. But everyone knows the most creative innovators are people who need to CONCENTRATE on producing things. Periods of intense concentration that is needed is not fostered in these ghastly noise &amp; interruption ridden work places. I&#8217;ve experienced first hand how extremely difficult it is to work when people are always approaching at you with their nonsense. </p>
<p>The recruitment industry seems to operate on this myth that people need endless noise &amp; distractions in order to stay motivated &amp; to achieve more. But in these type of offices, the exact opposite occurs. We all know how poisonous negative employee&#8217;s morale can be to the team. Well guess what? When you are constantly exposed to them every minute of your work day &#8211; you are a sitting duck. Who wonders why at the end of each day why they didn&#8217;t achieve as much as they expected &amp; vows to make up for it tomorrow, and then the next day &amp; the next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Slow Death of the Cubicle &#171; annenimke</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-64418</link>
		<dc:creator>The Slow Death of the Cubicle &#171; annenimke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=25594#comment-64418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Ah the Googlization of the workplace&#8230;I love it!  In this article by Dr. John Sullivan he attributes the death of cubicle and a new way to look at how a physical workspace impacts productivity and innovation to Google. The Death of the Cubicle — and the Killers Are Collaboration and Innovation &#8211; ERE.net [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ah the Googlization of the workplace&#8230;I love it!  In this article by Dr. John Sullivan he attributes the death of cubicle and a new way to look at how a physical workspace impacts productivity and innovation to Google. The Death of the Cubicle — and the Killers Are Collaboration and Innovation &#8211; ERE.net [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-64416</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=25594#comment-64416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Companies will spend a lot of money to create a great open area environment but they slowly revert back to cubicles and ultimately costing more money.

I&#039;ve personally seen corporate IT departments try to mix Agile/Scrum methods using an open room (XP programming style).  They wind up having more failed iterations.

But this idea of a communal works space spawning creativity and increased productivity has been implemented for decades and as ALWAYS it&#039;s been the exact opposite.

IT candidates want to telecommute. Having to drive into work every day pounding out code in large room of other programmers is a very hard &quot;sale&quot; and it makes for a LOT of turnover.

Recruiters - Please tell your manager to never have this type of recruiting environment. You need to develop relationships with candidates and the candidate needs to feel like they are talking to a recruiter NOT a CALL center or a Telemarketer. Plus, you want to be happy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Companies will spend a lot of money to create a great open area environment but they slowly revert back to cubicles and ultimately costing more money.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve personally seen corporate IT departments try to mix Agile/Scrum methods using an open room (XP programming style).  They wind up having more failed iterations.</p>
<p>But this idea of a communal works space spawning creativity and increased productivity has been implemented for decades and as ALWAYS it&#8217;s been the exact opposite.</p>
<p>IT candidates want to telecommute. Having to drive into work every day pounding out code in large room of other programmers is a very hard &#8220;sale&#8221; and it makes for a LOT of turnover.</p>
<p>Recruiters &#8211; Please tell your manager to never have this type of recruiting environment. You need to develop relationships with candidates and the candidate needs to feel like they are talking to a recruiter NOT a CALL center or a Telemarketer. Plus, you want to be happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Wahl</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-64413</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Wahl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 13:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=25594#comment-64413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few questions.  If cubicles are such a bad thing, why were they invented in the first place and so readily adopted?  Didn&#039;t we have open space before them?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few questions.  If cubicles are such a bad thing, why were they invented in the first place and so readily adopted?  Didn&#8217;t we have open space before them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Lisney</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-64406</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lisney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 05:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=25594#comment-64406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr Sullivan, thank you for your insights and a well written article. I suspect that this type of environment will be best suited for those professionals that need to be creative by collaboration. I&#039;d be worried to see an investment banker conducting his trade from a hammock, even in the Cayman Islands. We frequently encounter concerns from candidates when placing legal professionals from practise into a bank or telco. Environments that encourage more team work and process. We often receive the immediate feedback, how do I concentrate if I don’t get my own room. Indeed, certain professionals need their individual space, especially those that are more individual players. A solution for those professionals may well be your own room or cubicle and then have an open playground area for those team meetings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Sullivan, thank you for your insights and a well written article. I suspect that this type of environment will be best suited for those professionals that need to be creative by collaboration. I&#8217;d be worried to see an investment banker conducting his trade from a hammock, even in the Cayman Islands. We frequently encounter concerns from candidates when placing legal professionals from practise into a bank or telco. Environments that encourage more team work and process. We often receive the immediate feedback, how do I concentrate if I don’t get my own room. Indeed, certain professionals need their individual space, especially those that are more individual players. A solution for those professionals may well be your own room or cubicle and then have an open playground area for those team meetings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Halperin</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-64399</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Halperin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 16:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=25594#comment-64399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, Dr. Sullivan. 
Michael, you hit the nail on the head.
&quot;Open plan&quot; aka, &quot;bull pen&quot; is one of the best arguments I know for tele-commuting. Who wants to be crammed in cheek-by-jowl with visibility and audibility all the time?


Cheers,

Keith]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Dr. Sullivan.<br />
Michael, you hit the nail on the head.<br />
&#8220;Open plan&#8221; aka, &#8220;bull pen&#8221; is one of the best arguments I know for tele-commuting. Who wants to be crammed in cheek-by-jowl with visibility and audibility all the time?</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Keith</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Esry</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-64398</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Esry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 16:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=25594#comment-64398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty much everything in Mr. Glenns list, the noise, employees not getting along, overhearing phone calls, employees being to chatty, all happen with cubicles already.  We are trying the no-cubicle idea and there need to be ground rules regarding smelly food, keeping your work area fairly tidy (our employees have under-desk cabinets to keep personal effects), etc.  Our employees have headphones for when they want to listen to music. Many of the things that Mr. Glenn lists as issues, have nothing to do with workspace.  Providing a private conference room for prayer or for private conversations (including private calls home- that what cell phones are for) is needed with cubicles or with an open work space.  The only way you are going to avoid the issues Mr. Glenn mentions is if everyone has a real office with a door, and everyone is isolated.  Our employees asked to try the open workspace, and its worked well for us.  Everyone has a laptop so they can move to a conference room for conference calls with clients.  Everyone is respectful regarding noise, so it hasnt been an issue.  This type of work space will not fit all cultures, but its working for us so far.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty much everything in Mr. Glenns list, the noise, employees not getting along, overhearing phone calls, employees being to chatty, all happen with cubicles already.  We are trying the no-cubicle idea and there need to be ground rules regarding smelly food, keeping your work area fairly tidy (our employees have under-desk cabinets to keep personal effects), etc.  Our employees have headphones for when they want to listen to music. Many of the things that Mr. Glenn lists as issues, have nothing to do with workspace.  Providing a private conference room for prayer or for private conversations (including private calls home- that what cell phones are for) is needed with cubicles or with an open work space.  The only way you are going to avoid the issues Mr. Glenn mentions is if everyone has a real office with a door, and everyone is isolated.  Our employees asked to try the open workspace, and its worked well for us.  Everyone has a laptop so they can move to a conference room for conference calls with clients.  Everyone is respectful regarding noise, so it hasnt been an issue.  This type of work space will not fit all cultures, but its working for us so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gimbel</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2012/05/21/the-death-of-the-cubicle-and-the-killers-are-collaboration-and-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-64396</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gimbel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 16:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=25594#comment-64396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For companies that want to foster collaboration, creativity and camaraderie among workers, an open floor plan is the way to go. As a staffing firm, our open floor plan allows our recruiters to interact and share ideas, triumphs, failures and experiences. We believe in over-communicating, and the anti-cubicle atmosphere promotes that. 

Another way we&#039;ve found to foster collaboration and creativity is to have staff move desks. Here are a few advantages: http://pastfive.typepad.com/pastfive/2012/04/increase-employee-moral-move-their-desks.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For companies that want to foster collaboration, creativity and camaraderie among workers, an open floor plan is the way to go. As a staffing firm, our open floor plan allows our recruiters to interact and share ideas, triumphs, failures and experiences. We believe in over-communicating, and the anti-cubicle atmosphere promotes that. </p>
<p>Another way we&#8217;ve found to foster collaboration and creativity is to have staff move desks. Here are a few advantages: <a href="http://pastfive.typepad.com/pastfive/2012/04/increase-employee-moral-move-their-desks.html" rel="nofollow">http://pastfive.typepad.com/pastfive/2012/04/increase-employee-moral-move-their-desks.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
