<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Tens of Thousands&#8221; of New Dot-Jobs Boards Coming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ere.net/2009/10/29/tens-of-thousands-of-new-dot-jobs-boards-coming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/29/tens-of-thousands-of-new-dot-jobs-boards-coming/</link>
	<description>Recruiting News, Recruiting Events, Recruiting Community, Social Recruiting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:03:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: .Jobs Expansion Stands, Says Internet Address Authority - ERE.net</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/29/tens-of-thousands-of-new-dot-jobs-boards-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-39420</link>
		<dc:creator>.Jobs Expansion Stands, Says Internet Address Authority - ERE.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10526#comment-39420</guid>
		<description>[...] Had Employ Media not already signaled its plan for the new names, it might still have faced opposition to expanding the original company name-only address limitation. But the future was made plain last year when it &#8220;loaned&#8221; dozens of occupational and geographic domains to the DirectEmployers Association, which launched dozens of job boards with plans for thousands more. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Had Employ Media not already signaled its plan for the new names, it might still have faced opposition to expanding the original company name-only address limitation. But the future was made plain last year when it &#8220;loaned&#8221; dozens of occupational and geographic domains to the DirectEmployers Association, which launched dozens of job boards with plans for thousands more. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .Jobs Opens RFP Process - ERE.net</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/29/tens-of-thousands-of-new-dot-jobs-boards-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-30520</link>
		<dc:creator>.Jobs Opens RFP Process - ERE.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10526#comment-30520</guid>
		<description>[...] Last fall, the two organizations joined forces to launch several dozen job boards using geographic and occupation-specific names, such as Atlanta.jobs and Nursing.jobs. At the time, DirectEmployers boasted it would eventually launch hundreds of thousands of such sites. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last fall, the two organizations joined forces to launch several dozen job boards using geographic and occupation-specific names, such as Atlanta.jobs and Nursing.jobs. At the time, DirectEmployers boasted it would eventually launch hundreds of thousands of such sites. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Job Boards Still Evolving After all These Years - ERE.net</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/29/tens-of-thousands-of-new-dot-jobs-boards-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-30344</link>
		<dc:creator>Job Boards Still Evolving After all These Years - ERE.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10526#comment-30344</guid>
		<description>[...] ready to launch more. A good part of the recent debate over the .jobs domain expansion was about DirectEmployers Association&#8217;s plan to launch tens of thousands of more job [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ready to launch more. A good part of the recent debate over the .jobs domain expansion was about DirectEmployers Association&#8217;s plan to launch tens of thousands of more job [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guests Invited to Hear of Million Job Board Plan - ERE.net</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/29/tens-of-thousands-of-new-dot-jobs-boards-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-28900</link>
		<dc:creator>Guests Invited to Hear of Million Job Board Plan - ERE.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10526#comment-28900</guid>
		<description>[...] the program has been underway since October, the meeting later this month is described as an informational session. The invitation that was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the program has been underway since October, the meeting later this month is described as an informational session. The invitation that was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why SHRM Must Reject the .jobs Amendment : ERE.net</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/29/tens-of-thousands-of-new-dot-jobs-boards-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-21291</link>
		<dc:creator>Why SHRM Must Reject the .jobs Amendment : ERE.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 02:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10526#comment-21291</guid>
		<description>[...] by employers, and the .jobs TLD is widely considered to be a disappointment. In October 2009, Employ Media partnered with DirectEmployers to launch the first of a series of geographic and occupationally focused web sites using the .jobs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by employers, and the .jobs TLD is widely considered to be a disappointment. In October 2009, Employ Media partnered with DirectEmployers to launch the first of a series of geographic and occupationally focused web sites using the .jobs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A &#8220;Universe&#8221; Of .Jobs Job Boards Is Set To Launch : ERE.net</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/29/tens-of-thousands-of-new-dot-jobs-boards-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-16756</link>
		<dc:creator>A &#8220;Universe&#8221; Of .Jobs Job Boards Is Set To Launch : ERE.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10526#comment-16756</guid>
		<description>[...] Chad Sowash said tens of thousands of new jobs sites were on their way, he wasn&#8217;t kidding. Millions of new job boards is the goal, says a new website from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chad Sowash said tens of thousands of new jobs sites were on their way, he wasn&#8217;t kidding. Millions of new job boards is the goal, says a new website from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Dalrymple</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/29/tens-of-thousands-of-new-dot-jobs-boards-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-16736</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Dalrymple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10526#comment-16736</guid>
		<description>&quot;But he didn’t anticipate resistance from the job boards, most of whom are struggling in the economy and couldn’t take on a project of this magnitude.&quot;

The notion that some company that no one has ever heard of is the only company in the world that can handle doing something simple as setting up a database to hold jobs and then display them on a different domain based on geographical input is ludicrous. You&#039;re talking about a 3 month project here that could be done for &lt; $50,000. Why is this blown out of proportion? If you&#039;re trying to rationalize backdoor dealings that eliminate competition by claiming to be the only company capable of handling a project that most SME companies could take with no problem, you&#039;re really reaching for straws.

This whole thing is shady and ICANN should be ashamed of themselves for allowing it to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But he didn’t anticipate resistance from the job boards, most of whom are struggling in the economy and couldn’t take on a project of this magnitude.&#8221;</p>
<p>The notion that some company that no one has ever heard of is the only company in the world that can handle doing something simple as setting up a database to hold jobs and then display them on a different domain based on geographical input is ludicrous. You&#8217;re talking about a 3 month project here that could be done for &lt; $50,000. Why is this blown out of proportion? If you&#039;re trying to rationalize backdoor dealings that eliminate competition by claiming to be the only company capable of handling a project that most SME companies could take with no problem, you&#039;re really reaching for straws.</p>
<p>This whole thing is shady and ICANN should be ashamed of themselves for allowing it to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DirectEmployers Launches .jobs Sites &#124; Jobs Portal Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/29/tens-of-thousands-of-new-dot-jobs-boards-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-16559</link>
		<dc:creator>DirectEmployers Launches .jobs Sites &#124; Jobs Portal Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10526#comment-16559</guid>
		<description>[...] of thousands” of .jobs websites focused on specific occupations and geographic areas.  ere.net reports that the new websites, which currently include mexico.jobs, india.jobs and boston.jobs, can be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of thousands” of .jobs websites focused on specific occupations and geographic areas.  ere.net reports that the new websites, which currently include mexico.jobs, india.jobs and boston.jobs, can be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff DickeyChasins</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/29/tens-of-thousands-of-new-dot-jobs-boards-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-16519</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff DickeyChasins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10526#comment-16519</guid>
		<description>I agree with Maureen - I can&#039;t even begin to count the number of &#039;earth shattering&#039; changes I&#039;ve seen come and go with little or no effect. And Steve is right, too - I don&#039;t perceive these as a threat to job boards. It&#039;s all about the job seekers: will they even be aware of these sites? Will they even care? Like Chris said, it will take some marketing firepower to make them know about the sites. Kind of nutty, really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Maureen &#8211; I can&#8217;t even begin to count the number of &#8216;earth shattering&#8217; changes I&#8217;ve seen come and go with little or no effect. And Steve is right, too &#8211; I don&#8217;t perceive these as a threat to job boards. It&#8217;s all about the job seekers: will they even be aware of these sites? Will they even care? Like Chris said, it will take some marketing firepower to make them know about the sites. Kind of nutty, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/29/tens-of-thousands-of-new-dot-jobs-boards-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-16409</link>
		<dc:creator>eric shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10526#comment-16409</guid>
		<description>the real travesty is ICANN. they follow the money while posing as a nonprofit or governmental organization. but then that&#039;s par for the course for many of the nonprofits i&#039;ve watched anyhow.  

ICANN is the one that legitimized .jobs with no intention of monitoring or enforcing the agreements... and in light of the new tlds coming, it&#039;s clear they would have liked to approve .jobs without any limitations in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the real travesty is ICANN. they follow the money while posing as a nonprofit or governmental organization. but then that&#8217;s par for the course for many of the nonprofits i&#8217;ve watched anyhow.  </p>
<p>ICANN is the one that legitimized .jobs with no intention of monitoring or enforcing the agreements&#8230; and in light of the new tlds coming, it&#8217;s clear they would have liked to approve .jobs without any limitations in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Rothberg</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/29/tens-of-thousands-of-new-dot-jobs-boards-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-16408</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Rothberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10526#comment-16408</guid>
		<description>This is a travesty. I&#039;ve got nothing against DirectEmployers or the others involved. They&#039;re trying to turn spoiled milk into cheese and I wish them all the best in that effort, but the rules under which .jobs was created were either poorly drafted or haven&#039;t been followed. This new domain was promoted as only being available to employers to promote their own jobs. Clearly that hasn&#039;t been the case. In the name of the almighty buck, those whose finances were negatively impacted by that failure to execute have now turned to plan B and they should be ashamed of themselves.

It may be counter intuitive to some, but as a job board owner I don&#039;t really care about yet another network of cookie cutter sites popping up. There are number of them out there already and the impact they have on our business is negligible. Collectively they attract some job seeker traffic and a few postings here and there, but individually they have no impact whatsoever in a world with 100,000 job boards already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a travesty. I&#8217;ve got nothing against DirectEmployers or the others involved. They&#8217;re trying to turn spoiled milk into cheese and I wish them all the best in that effort, but the rules under which .jobs was created were either poorly drafted or haven&#8217;t been followed. This new domain was promoted as only being available to employers to promote their own jobs. Clearly that hasn&#8217;t been the case. In the name of the almighty buck, those whose finances were negatively impacted by that failure to execute have now turned to plan B and they should be ashamed of themselves.</p>
<p>It may be counter intuitive to some, but as a job board owner I don&#8217;t really care about yet another network of cookie cutter sites popping up. There are number of them out there already and the impact they have on our business is negligible. Collectively they attract some job seeker traffic and a few postings here and there, but individually they have no impact whatsoever in a world with 100,000 job boards already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maureen Sharib</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/29/tens-of-thousands-of-new-dot-jobs-boards-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-16395</link>
		<dc:creator>Maureen Sharib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10526#comment-16395</guid>
		<description>&quot;... I would add that making this work will probably be the most difficult project...&quot;

I laughed when I read this as it reminded me of all the start-and-stop projects, blogs, websites, twitter accounts - all the stuff related to social media that gets started these days in heated rushes and then abandoned as the ardor cools and the next shiny object catches their attention.  Know what I mean?   

Starting something MEANS NOTHING if you can&#039;t keep at it and this is the fatal flaw in many if not most of these start and stop &quot;good ideas&quot;.  Recruiting Animal is having a &quot;Wherever In the World Did They Go?&quot; show at the end of the year to highlight some of these phenomena.  I hope you watch for it.  I am.

(By the way, I wish DirectEmployers the BEST of luck.  I just ask you keep showin&#039; us what you got.)

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230; I would add that making this work will probably be the most difficult project&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I laughed when I read this as it reminded me of all the start-and-stop projects, blogs, websites, twitter accounts &#8211; all the stuff related to social media that gets started these days in heated rushes and then abandoned as the ardor cools and the next shiny object catches their attention.  Know what I mean?   </p>
<p>Starting something MEANS NOTHING if you can&#8217;t keep at it and this is the fatal flaw in many if not most of these start and stop &#8220;good ideas&#8221;.  Recruiting Animal is having a &#8220;Wherever In the World Did They Go?&#8221; show at the end of the year to highlight some of these phenomena.  I hope you watch for it.  I am.</p>
<p>(By the way, I wish DirectEmployers the BEST of luck.  I just ask you keep showin&#8217; us what you got.)</p>
<p>;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/29/tens-of-thousands-of-new-dot-jobs-boards-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-16376</link>
		<dc:creator>eric shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10526#comment-16376</guid>
		<description>having spent the last couple of years building a network with some similarities, I would add that making this work will probably be the most difficult project jobcentral has ever taken on. that is, if it&#039;s to really change the playing field. 

jobcentral and .jobs seem to have done a nice job of aligning their interests. it will be interesting to see if it makes enough sense to the other constituencies and, if it does, whether it can hold over a sustained period of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>having spent the last couple of years building a network with some similarities, I would add that making this work will probably be the most difficult project jobcentral has ever taken on. that is, if it&#8217;s to really change the playing field. </p>
<p>jobcentral and .jobs seem to have done a nice job of aligning their interests. it will be interesting to see if it makes enough sense to the other constituencies and, if it does, whether it can hold over a sustained period of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/29/tens-of-thousands-of-new-dot-jobs-boards-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-16374</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10526#comment-16374</guid>
		<description>This is a strange turn of events for the .jobs domain. I was hopeful the domain would be opened up to the industry at large. There are other job board owners who could&#039;ve put it to good use. 

I&#039;m also not sure if employers have any incentive to &quot;promote&quot; these sites since they are already busy trying to promote their own career pages. This idea simply seems to be a experiment to get search engine traffic. But if no one links to these sites, search traffic will be hard to come by. And as any job board owner knows you have to market yourself to get traffic.

The consensus of the job board industry lately is that there are &quot;too many&quot; sites so this deal doesn&#039;t seem to help that perception. 

However it would have been nice if other job board owners were invited to the party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a strange turn of events for the .jobs domain. I was hopeful the domain would be opened up to the industry at large. There are other job board owners who could&#8217;ve put it to good use. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m also not sure if employers have any incentive to &#8220;promote&#8221; these sites since they are already busy trying to promote their own career pages. This idea simply seems to be a experiment to get search engine traffic. But if no one links to these sites, search traffic will be hard to come by. And as any job board owner knows you have to market yourself to get traffic.</p>
<p>The consensus of the job board industry lately is that there are &#8220;too many&#8221; sites so this deal doesn&#8217;t seem to help that perception. </p>
<p>However it would have been nice if other job board owners were invited to the party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

