<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Recruiting and Universal Truths</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ere.net/2009/10/07/social-recruiting-and-universal-truths/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/07/social-recruiting-and-universal-truths/</link>
	<description>Recruiting News, Recruiting Events, Recruiting Community, Social Recruiting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:03:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Off to the 2010 #SocialRecruiting Summit at the pursuit of techyness</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/07/social-recruiting-and-universal-truths/comment-page-1/#comment-24115</link>
		<dc:creator>Off to the 2010 #SocialRecruiting Summit at the pursuit of techyness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 15:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10248#comment-24115</guid>
		<description>[...] function. I mean, every company wants to find and retain talent!    Laurie Ruettimann, the Chair of the 2009 #SocialRecruiting Summit defined it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] function. I mean, every company wants to find and retain talent!    Laurie Ruettimann, the Chair of the 2009 #SocialRecruiting Summit defined it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie Ruettimann</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/07/social-recruiting-and-universal-truths/comment-page-1/#comment-16139</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie Ruettimann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10248#comment-16139</guid>
		<description>I grabbed my buddy, @waynesutton, to talk about social recruiting. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3uvgQX2jiE He shared his thoughts in this little video, y&#039;all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I grabbed my buddy, @waynesutton, to talk about social recruiting. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3uvgQX2jiE" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3uvgQX2jiE</a> He shared his thoughts in this little video, y&#8217;all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/07/social-recruiting-and-universal-truths/comment-page-1/#comment-15751</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10248#comment-15751</guid>
		<description>Hi - feel free to check out my earlier attempt to define social recruiting http://thoughtleaders.ning.com/profiles/blogs/wtf-is-social-recruiting 

A 1969 painting entitled Street Corner http://bit.ly/rH8hw , by artist Richard Killeen http://bit.ly/dJD2E that I saw recently got me thinking about what constitutes social recruiting and a social recruiting platform. In the painting you will note each person in the crowd appears disconnected from those around them, or as described by the painter himself “... the paradox of being anonymous but part of a group.” Does there actually need to be conversation, and a sense of community, between members to be called social recruiting and a social recruiting platform? Or does direct conversation between employer and recruiters constitute social recruiting? I don&#039;t know the answer, but the picture has got me thinking deeper about all this stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; feel free to check out my earlier attempt to define social recruiting <a href="http://thoughtleaders.ning.com/profiles/blogs/wtf-is-social-recruiting" rel="nofollow">http://thoughtleaders.ning.com/profiles/blogs/wtf-is-social-recruiting</a> </p>
<p>A 1969 painting entitled Street Corner <a href="http://bit.ly/rH8hw" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/rH8hw</a> , by artist Richard Killeen <a href="http://bit.ly/dJD2E" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dJD2E</a> that I saw recently got me thinking about what constitutes social recruiting and a social recruiting platform. In the painting you will note each person in the crowd appears disconnected from those around them, or as described by the painter himself “&#8230; the paradox of being anonymous but part of a group.” Does there actually need to be conversation, and a sense of community, between members to be called social recruiting and a social recruiting platform? Or does direct conversation between employer and recruiters constitute social recruiting? I don&#8217;t know the answer, but the picture has got me thinking deeper about all this stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie Ruettimann</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/07/social-recruiting-and-universal-truths/comment-page-1/#comment-15748</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie Ruettimann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 23:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10248#comment-15748</guid>
		<description>Glenn, thanks for your thoughts on social sourcing versus social recruiting. Will check out your links. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn, thanks for your thoughts on social sourcing versus social recruiting. Will check out your links. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/07/social-recruiting-and-universal-truths/comment-page-1/#comment-15730</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10248#comment-15730</guid>
		<description>I think people are mistaking the current incarnation of &quot;social recruiting&quot;.  Most of what I&#039;ve seen on the web is nothing more than social &quot;sourcing&quot;.  

To me, recruiting is an end-to-end process that culminates in the presentation of a slate of screened, assessed, qualified and interested candidates to a client (internal or external).  Merely getting candidates to populate an ATS or inbox as they apply for a position they found on LinkedIn, Twitter of Facebook (or any other social venue) does not ease the recruiter&#039;s burden of sifting through the digital piles of resumes - hoping to find a presentable candidate or two.  I&#039;ve seen this first hand when I ran Talent Acquisition at AOL.  I can tell you first hand that this is especially true as you move up the organizational chart.

What we&#039;ve done with BusinessElite is build a Social Recruiting Platform - one that not only leverages the recruiter&#039;s social/professional networks in a more strategic manner but also those of recruiting &quot;stakeholders&quot; (and yes, I like using that term as it adequately represents the interests of hiring managers, et al). But, we&#039;ve moved beyond the social sourcing aspects by integrating into our platform our own matching technologies that stack-ranks candidates based on scoring their backgrounds against a scored position spec and also using our own leadership impact assessment to help make the best matches.

I will be blogging about this in more detail over time.  In the interim you can see how BusinessElite works by visiting our site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think people are mistaking the current incarnation of &#8220;social recruiting&#8221;.  Most of what I&#8217;ve seen on the web is nothing more than social &#8220;sourcing&#8221;.  </p>
<p>To me, recruiting is an end-to-end process that culminates in the presentation of a slate of screened, assessed, qualified and interested candidates to a client (internal or external).  Merely getting candidates to populate an ATS or inbox as they apply for a position they found on LinkedIn, Twitter of Facebook (or any other social venue) does not ease the recruiter&#8217;s burden of sifting through the digital piles of resumes &#8211; hoping to find a presentable candidate or two.  I&#8217;ve seen this first hand when I ran Talent Acquisition at AOL.  I can tell you first hand that this is especially true as you move up the organizational chart.</p>
<p>What we&#8217;ve done with BusinessElite is build a Social Recruiting Platform &#8211; one that not only leverages the recruiter&#8217;s social/professional networks in a more strategic manner but also those of recruiting &#8220;stakeholders&#8221; (and yes, I like using that term as it adequately represents the interests of hiring managers, et al). But, we&#8217;ve moved beyond the social sourcing aspects by integrating into our platform our own matching technologies that stack-ranks candidates based on scoring their backgrounds against a scored position spec and also using our own leadership impact assessment to help make the best matches.</p>
<p>I will be blogging about this in more detail over time.  In the interim you can see how BusinessElite works by visiting our site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurie Ruettimann</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/07/social-recruiting-and-universal-truths/comment-page-1/#comment-15726</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurie Ruettimann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10248#comment-15726</guid>
		<description>@Jeff That&#039;s pretty good. I&#039;ll take it. I hate the word stakeholders, though. It&#039;s too corporate in a medium that eschews corporate formalities. ;)

@Sean Good reminder that social recruiting isn&#039;t as ubiquitous as those in the bubble might assume. I keep hearing that F100 companies want to see more than just social media strategies: they want to understand how their systems and processes will comply with OFFCP standards, the ADA, jobs for veterans, affirmative actions plans, etc. They want a big company to get audited and cited so they can learn from that company&#039;s mistake. Oy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeff That&#8217;s pretty good. I&#8217;ll take it. I hate the word stakeholders, though. It&#8217;s too corporate in a medium that eschews corporate formalities. ;)</p>
<p>@Sean Good reminder that social recruiting isn&#8217;t as ubiquitous as those in the bubble might assume. I keep hearing that F100 companies want to see more than just social media strategies: they want to understand how their systems and processes will comply with OFFCP standards, the ADA, jobs for veterans, affirmative actions plans, etc. They want a big company to get audited and cited so they can learn from that company&#8217;s mistake. Oy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/07/social-recruiting-and-universal-truths/comment-page-1/#comment-15722</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10248#comment-15722</guid>
		<description>Laurie, I don&#039;t use the term &quot;social recruiting&quot; to define a unique construct, nor do I personally use the term.  I do believe, however, a separate distinction is warranted in today&#039;s business environment.  Although we live in a culture immersed in social media, generational norms have inhibited comprehensive adoption of social networking tools and concepts.  While I believe this is slowly but surely eroding - heck even my wife&#039;s 85 yr old grandfather is using Facebook now - more time is needed before social media and recruiting are ubiquitous and embedded in daily recruiting operations.  I have F250 clients who have still not developed a social media strategy, and although they believe it is important, their recruiters are still using traditional search methods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laurie, I don&#8217;t use the term &#8220;social recruiting&#8221; to define a unique construct, nor do I personally use the term.  I do believe, however, a separate distinction is warranted in today&#8217;s business environment.  Although we live in a culture immersed in social media, generational norms have inhibited comprehensive adoption of social networking tools and concepts.  While I believe this is slowly but surely eroding &#8211; heck even my wife&#8217;s 85 yr old grandfather is using Facebook now &#8211; more time is needed before social media and recruiting are ubiquitous and embedded in daily recruiting operations.  I have F250 clients who have still not developed a social media strategy, and although they believe it is important, their recruiters are still using traditional search methods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Berger</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/10/07/social-recruiting-and-universal-truths/comment-page-1/#comment-15717</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=10248#comment-15717</guid>
		<description>Social Recruiting - bringing the identity-sharing process that makes social media successful to a job recruiting space shared by talent, companies, and other stake-holders. 

What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social Recruiting &#8211; bringing the identity-sharing process that makes social media successful to a job recruiting space shared by talent, companies, and other stake-holders. </p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

