<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dot-JOBS Addresses Could Be Opened Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ere.net/2009/04/29/dot-jobs-addresses-could-be-opened-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/04/29/dot-jobs-addresses-could-be-opened-up/</link>
	<description>Recruiting News, Recruiting Events, Recruiting Community, Social Recruiting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:03:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odd Announcement in .Jobs Case as U.S. Chamber, Monster Weigh in - ERE.net</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/04/29/dot-jobs-addresses-could-be-opened-up/comment-page-1/#comment-32319</link>
		<dc:creator>Odd Announcement in .Jobs Case as U.S. Chamber, Monster Weigh in - ERE.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=7731#comment-32319</guid>
		<description>[...] were ever issued and that number has since dropped), Employ Media and its CEO Tom Embrescia began casting about for ways to pump up interest. One was to open up the use to almost any name combination. That lead to the launch last fall of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] were ever issued and that number has since dropped), Employ Media and its CEO Tom Embrescia began casting about for ways to pump up interest. One was to open up the use to almost any name combination. That lead to the launch last fall of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .Jobs Council Seeks Info Now, Public Comment Later : ERE.net</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/04/29/dot-jobs-addresses-could-be-opened-up/comment-page-1/#comment-21492</link>
		<dc:creator>.Jobs Council Seeks Info Now, Public Comment Later : ERE.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 00:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=7731#comment-21492</guid>
		<description>[...] year ago, Employ Media&#8217;s CEO Tom Embrescia told me he was thinking of opening up the sale of .jobs to allow geographic, industry, and occupational [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year ago, Employ Media&#8217;s CEO Tom Embrescia told me he was thinking of opening up the sale of .jobs to allow geographic, industry, and occupational [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SHRM to Decide on Allowing Non-Company Names for .Jobs : ERE.net</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/04/29/dot-jobs-addresses-could-be-opened-up/comment-page-1/#comment-21251</link>
		<dc:creator>SHRM to Decide on Allowing Non-Company Names for .Jobs : ERE.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 03:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=7731#comment-21251</guid>
		<description>[...] That was the state of affairs going into 2009, when Tom Embrescia, CEO of Employ Media, began considering other options for promoting the use of the address. Among them was to open the registration to non-company name uses. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That was the state of affairs going into 2009, when Tom Embrescia, CEO of Employ Media, began considering other options for promoting the use of the address. Among them was to open the registration to non-company name uses. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Etheridge</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/04/29/dot-jobs-addresses-could-be-opened-up/comment-page-1/#comment-16144</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Etheridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=7731#comment-16144</guid>
		<description>This has become reality.  Check out http://www.atlanta.jobs or http://www.cleveland.jobs.  Their partnership with Direct Employers should have job boards and aggregators questioning their intent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has become reality.  Check out <a href="http://www.atlanta.jobs" rel="nofollow">http://www.atlanta.jobs</a> or <a href="http://www.cleveland.jobs" rel="nofollow">http://www.cleveland.jobs</a>.  Their partnership with Direct Employers should have job boards and aggregators questioning their intent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Joiner</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/04/29/dot-jobs-addresses-could-be-opened-up/comment-page-1/#comment-14334</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Joiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=7731#comment-14334</guid>
		<description>This does not surprise me.  Indeed, I have been expecting it and have long encouraged Employ Media to do this.  This is such an important issue for our industry.

I would hope, in the interest of fairness, that anyone who owns &quot;___jobs.com&quot; would be given the first opportunity to buy &quot;___.jobs&quot; for a reasonable price.  Additionally, the domain&#039;s new owners should be required to build it out rather than simply sit on the domain and later resell it at a profit, as has been the case with so many dot-com TLDs.

Example: MarketingJobs.com should get first crack at Marketing.Jobs.  A simple auction would be unfair to the jobseeker, given that the domain would go to the buyer with the deepest pockets -- not necessarily the one with the deepest commitment to the niche.

Don&#039;t you think?

Harry Joiner
EcommerceRecruiter.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This does not surprise me.  Indeed, I have been expecting it and have long encouraged Employ Media to do this.  This is such an important issue for our industry.</p>
<p>I would hope, in the interest of fairness, that anyone who owns &#8220;___jobs.com&#8221; would be given the first opportunity to buy &#8220;___.jobs&#8221; for a reasonable price.  Additionally, the domain&#8217;s new owners should be required to build it out rather than simply sit on the domain and later resell it at a profit, as has been the case with so many dot-com TLDs.</p>
<p>Example: MarketingJobs.com should get first crack at Marketing.Jobs.  A simple auction would be unfair to the jobseeker, given that the domain would go to the buyer with the deepest pockets &#8212; not necessarily the one with the deepest commitment to the niche.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p>Harry Joiner<br />
EcommerceRecruiter.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2009/04/29/dot-jobs-addresses-could-be-opened-up/comment-page-1/#comment-11993</link>
		<dc:creator>eric shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 12:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=7731#comment-11993</guid>
		<description>With widespread opposition to this plan among job board owners and presumably employers, now is the ideal time for employ media to move on this while most folks are distracted with survival.

I wonder how susceptible SHRM is to the lure of cash... would it disregard its members interests?

Would employee media need to divorce itself from SHRM to make this plan happen? Could it?

SHRM members deserve to know.

-- Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With widespread opposition to this plan among job board owners and presumably employers, now is the ideal time for employ media to move on this while most folks are distracted with survival.</p>
<p>I wonder how susceptible SHRM is to the lure of cash&#8230; would it disregard its members interests?</p>
<p>Would employee media need to divorce itself from SHRM to make this plan happen? Could it?</p>
<p>SHRM members deserve to know.</p>
<p>&#8211; Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

