<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recruiting Passive Candidates in Tough Economic Times</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ere.net/2008/07/18/recruiting-passive-candidates-in-tough-economic-times/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ere.net/2008/07/18/recruiting-passive-candidates-in-tough-economic-times/</link>
	<description>Recruiting intelligence. Recruiting community.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rose Knows</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2008/07/18/recruiting-passive-candidates-in-tough-economic-times/#comment-6112</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose Knows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=3341#comment-6112</guid>
		<description>"highly-regarded"?  By whom?  Subsitute "purse" for "position" in your schtik above and you can use it to sell knock-off handbags in Chinatown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;highly-regarded&#8221;?  By whom?  Subsitute &#8220;purse&#8221; for &#8220;position&#8221; in your schtik above and you can use it to sell knock-off handbags in Chinatown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou Adler</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2008/07/18/recruiting-passive-candidates-in-tough-economic-times/#comment-6083</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou Adler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=3341#comment-6083</guid>
		<description>I'd cut short the conversation, too, if someone "demanded" that I reveal my background. On the other hand, if I was talking to a highly-regarded executive recruiter who handled multiple executive-level positions, and requested that I provide a short two-minute overview of my background, I'd want to make sure the recruiter knew who I was. This is a minor piece of information of to provide, in exchange for a potential career-changing opportunity. 

What we've discovered that is top performers always consider the long term career opportunity in balance with the short term issues when deciding whether to accept an offer or not. However, these same people, only consider the short term issues when first talking with a recruiter for the first time. This is usually due to lack of time, etc. When recruiters delay this "instant judgment" in the first call, they tend to have much more in-depth meaningful career decisions. Some unprofessional recruiters come across as crass when they try this delaying tactic, the better ones come across as professional. But the key point, is for both the recruiter and candidate engage in an open dialogue, rather than making long term decisions using short-term information. 

Regardless, what I tell managers is to always talk with a recruiter to find out the generic types of positions the recruiter handles, and if they're in your career zone, you should spend time describing your background at a pretty high level. This way you'll at least learn about new career opportunities. You never know, one might turn out to be a great move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d cut short the conversation, too, if someone &#8220;demanded&#8221; that I reveal my background. On the other hand, if I was talking to a highly-regarded executive recruiter who handled multiple executive-level positions, and requested that I provide a short two-minute overview of my background, I&#8217;d want to make sure the recruiter knew who I was. This is a minor piece of information of to provide, in exchange for a potential career-changing opportunity. </p>
<p>What we&#8217;ve discovered that is top performers always consider the long term career opportunity in balance with the short term issues when deciding whether to accept an offer or not. However, these same people, only consider the short term issues when first talking with a recruiter for the first time. This is usually due to lack of time, etc. When recruiters delay this &#8220;instant judgment&#8221; in the first call, they tend to have much more in-depth meaningful career decisions. Some unprofessional recruiters come across as crass when they try this delaying tactic, the better ones come across as professional. But the key point, is for both the recruiter and candidate engage in an open dialogue, rather than making long term decisions using short-term information. </p>
<p>Regardless, what I tell managers is to always talk with a recruiter to find out the generic types of positions the recruiter handles, and if they&#8217;re in your career zone, you should spend time describing your background at a pretty high level. This way you&#8217;ll at least learn about new career opportunities. You never know, one might turn out to be a great move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ask a Manager</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2008/07/18/recruiting-passive-candidates-in-tough-economic-times/#comment-6082</link>
		<dc:creator>Ask a Manager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/?p=3341#comment-6082</guid>
		<description>I have to say that I would cut a conversation short with any recruiter who used these tactics with me. If you call me out of the blue and demand that I give you an overview of my current job before you tell me about the position you're calling about, I'd be really annoyed.  Most of the advice here would come across as game-playing and high-pressure sales tactics, and I'd want nothing to do with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that I would cut a conversation short with any recruiter who used these tactics with me. If you call me out of the blue and demand that I give you an overview of my current job before you tell me about the position you&#8217;re calling about, I&#8217;d be really annoyed.  Most of the advice here would come across as game-playing and high-pressure sales tactics, and I&#8217;d want nothing to do with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
