<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get Candidates Engaged</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ere.net/2008/05/16/get-candidates-engaged/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ere.net/2008/05/16/get-candidates-engaged/</link>
	<description>Recruiting intelligence. Recruiting community.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2008/05/16/get-candidates-engaged/#comment-5070</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 07:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/2008/05/16/get-candidates-engaged/#comment-5070</guid>
		<description>Joseph - Jim gives you good advice. In addition, regardless of whether the topics are always useful to me, I have to say it's impressive that some of these folks can continue to produce articles so regularly. I couldn't do it. 

And to give ERE their due, they did solicit articles recently in an effort to get more variety. Perhaps that should be done every other month!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph - Jim gives you good advice. In addition, regardless of whether the topics are always useful to me, I have to say it&#8217;s impressive that some of these folks can continue to produce articles so regularly. I couldn&#8217;t do it. </p>
<p>And to give ERE their due, they did solicit articles recently in an effort to get more variety. Perhaps that should be done every other month!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Cargill</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2008/05/16/get-candidates-engaged/#comment-5069</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Cargill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 06:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/2008/05/16/get-candidates-engaged/#comment-5069</guid>
		<description>Joseph,

I occasionally share your opinion, though encourage you to stay connected to ERE. It seems  that about 1 in 5 articles pertains to the needs of the TPR, or the the working relationship between the TPR and Corporate Recruiters. That is a high enough ratio to keep you connected, and to provide you with new ideas.

Granted, much of what appears here is self- promotion, or is derived from minutia-minded scholars, some of which have never actually recruited anyone, but do know a better way to do it. If nothing else, hang in for the articles by Lou Scott, and a few others who have made their living in the trenches.  We cannot be reminded too many times how to do the basics of this business, and finer details, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joseph,</p>
<p>I occasionally share your opinion, though encourage you to stay connected to ERE. It seems  that about 1 in 5 articles pertains to the needs of the TPR, or the the working relationship between the TPR and Corporate Recruiters. That is a high enough ratio to keep you connected, and to provide you with new ideas.</p>
<p>Granted, much of what appears here is self- promotion, or is derived from minutia-minded scholars, some of which have never actually recruited anyone, but do know a better way to do it. If nothing else, hang in for the articles by Lou Scott, and a few others who have made their living in the trenches.  We cannot be reminded too many times how to do the basics of this business, and finer details, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Ferreira</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2008/05/16/get-candidates-engaged/#comment-5068</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Ferreira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 08:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/2008/05/16/get-candidates-engaged/#comment-5068</guid>
		<description>I realize that, on the surface, Kevin's list of five Web 2.0 tools may seem to be simply a list of cool features, but how you apply them will make all the difference in the world. 

We've all been through the discovery that gobs of Web traffic does not equal success. I think in the next two years we'll also discover that gobs of interaction isn't necessarily success either. 

The real value in social interaction is when the audience becomes truly engaged. Not just 'engaged'... I said 'truly engaged'. The 'truly' part comes when candidates think to themselves, 'I'm really glad I found this site.' 

So maybe it's not just a Webinar... Maybe it's a virtual presentation for the most qualified applicants. Or maybe it's a podcasts that demonstrates the right career conversations for hard-to-source professionals (with e-mail Q&#038;A just to make it real Web 2.0). 

The key is that candidates can find fun anywhere. What they want from YOU is value toward their mission. Something that gives them an edge or helps them feel the high-touch of a satisfying engagement. 

Existing networks may also serve your needs better than building a social network of your own. Utilizing networks like LinkedIN, Facebook, or Plaxo as a means of staying connected with the best candidates will keep you from trying to boil the ocean. 

Most importantly, I think we all need to recognize that an article on ERE can?t provide the specific solution that will work for you and your business. The quality solutions are buried deep down beneath what seems to be the most repetitive droning. Web 2.0 solutions hold some real promise if we can think past the commonplace solutions at the surface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize that, on the surface, Kevin&#8217;s list of five Web 2.0 tools may seem to be simply a list of cool features, but how you apply them will make all the difference in the world. </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve all been through the discovery that gobs of Web traffic does not equal success. I think in the next two years we&#8217;ll also discover that gobs of interaction isn&#8217;t necessarily success either. </p>
<p>The real value in social interaction is when the audience becomes truly engaged. Not just &#8216;engaged&#8217;&#8230; I said &#8216;truly engaged&#8217;. The &#8216;truly&#8217; part comes when candidates think to themselves, &#8216;I&#8217;m really glad I found this site.&#8217; </p>
<p>So maybe it&#8217;s not just a Webinar&#8230; Maybe it&#8217;s a virtual presentation for the most qualified applicants. Or maybe it&#8217;s a podcasts that demonstrates the right career conversations for hard-to-source professionals (with e-mail Q&#038;A just to make it real Web 2.0). </p>
<p>The key is that candidates can find fun anywhere. What they want from YOU is value toward their mission. Something that gives them an edge or helps them feel the high-touch of a satisfying engagement. </p>
<p>Existing networks may also serve your needs better than building a social network of your own. Utilizing networks like LinkedIN, Facebook, or Plaxo as a means of staying connected with the best candidates will keep you from trying to boil the ocean. </p>
<p>Most importantly, I think we all need to recognize that an article on ERE can?t provide the specific solution that will work for you and your business. The quality solutions are buried deep down beneath what seems to be the most repetitive droning. Web 2.0 solutions hold some real promise if we can think past the commonplace solutions at the surface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2008/05/16/get-candidates-engaged/#comment-5067</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/2008/05/16/get-candidates-engaged/#comment-5067</guid>
		<description>When I signed up to receive these informative and job-enlightening articles in my email, I was hoping I would be getting some useful information. However, I have to admit that I'm done with these ERE articles as this one has really pushed me over the edge.

How many generic internet networking articles by self-promoting blogging consultants before we say enough? 
Sure, I don't have to read it...but, I'm posting this to suggest that we move on to some new topics.  Please.
Thanks,
Joe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I signed up to receive these informative and job-enlightening articles in my email, I was hoping I would be getting some useful information. However, I have to admit that I&#8217;m done with these ERE articles as this one has really pushed me over the edge.</p>
<p>How many generic internet networking articles by self-promoting blogging consultants before we say enough?<br />
Sure, I don&#8217;t have to read it&#8230;but, I&#8217;m posting this to suggest that we move on to some new topics.  Please.<br />
Thanks,<br />
Joe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
