<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Onboarding That Welcomes and Inspires</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ere.net/2008/04/10/onboarding-that-welcomes-and-inspires/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ere.net/2008/04/10/onboarding-that-welcomes-and-inspires/</link>
	<description>Recruiting News, Recruiting Events, Recruiting Community, Social Recruiting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:03:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Importance of Measuring Quality of Hire (and 4 Big Reasons Why)</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2008/04/10/onboarding-that-welcomes-and-inspires/comment-page-1/#comment-33203</link>
		<dc:creator>The Importance of Measuring Quality of Hire (and 4 Big Reasons Why)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/2008/04/10/onboarding-that-welcomes-and-inspires/#comment-33203</guid>
		<description>[...] Since all of the factors on our scorecard relate to real job needs, the same form can be used to measure both pre- and post-hire quality. This is a huge benefit. Subsequent differences between pre- and post-hire quality can then by attributed to changes in the job or environment, weak assessment skills, or hiring manager issues, and the like. This method requires that the performance expectations of the job be defined before hiring the person and discussed in detail during the onboarding period. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Since all of the factors on our scorecard relate to real job needs, the same form can be used to measure both pre- and post-hire quality. This is a huge benefit. Subsequent differences between pre- and post-hire quality can then by attributed to changes in the job or environment, weak assessment skills, or hiring manager issues, and the like. This method requires that the performance expectations of the job be defined before hiring the person and discussed in detail during the onboarding period. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

