<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AIRS Acquired By TheRightThing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ere.net/2008/02/18/airs-acquired-by-therightthing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ere.net/2008/02/18/airs-acquired-by-therightthing/</link>
	<description>Recruiting intelligence. Recruiting community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:18:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ramos</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2008/02/18/airs-acquired-by-therightthing/comment-page-1/#comment-3489</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ramos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/2008/02/18/airs-acquired-by-therightthing/#comment-3489</guid>
		<description>I can?t help but wonder if this doesn?t present a serious conflict of interest. If I?m associated with a staffing firm, and I decide I want to use a tool like SourcePoint, currently offered by AIRS, that means I have to purchase that tool from a parent company who?s main line of business is recruitment process outsourcing. Wouldn?t that potentially mean that to use that tool, associated with a RPO opens me up to having my recruiting talent potentially accessible for future recruitment purposes for that company? Not to say that is the intention, but I am uncomfortable with partnering with an organization that is not aligned with my core business and potentially a competitor under the right market conditions. 

I?m wondering if anyone else has concerns about their employee data being made available to an RPO under those circumstances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can?t help but wonder if this doesn?t present a serious conflict of interest. If I?m associated with a staffing firm, and I decide I want to use a tool like SourcePoint, currently offered by AIRS, that means I have to purchase that tool from a parent company who?s main line of business is recruitment process outsourcing. Wouldn?t that potentially mean that to use that tool, associated with a RPO opens me up to having my recruiting talent potentially accessible for future recruitment purposes for that company? Not to say that is the intention, but I am uncomfortable with partnering with an organization that is not aligned with my core business and potentially a competitor under the right market conditions. </p>
<p>I?m wondering if anyone else has concerns about their employee data being made available to an RPO under those circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Schneider</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2008/02/18/airs-acquired-by-therightthing/comment-page-1/#comment-3482</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/2008/02/18/airs-acquired-by-therightthing/#comment-3482</guid>
		<description>Although I wouldn&#039;t call it hypocrisy, because what is said IS true - people do need people, training helps both channels (direct sales and channel sales = recruiters and agencies). The concern is that AIRS is a training organization that is now part of an RPO. Is the organization really &quot;vendor neutral&quot;? The Right Thing is now a real end-to-end solution, pardon the overused market term, which is fine for some larger organizations...

I don&#039;t know, JobMachine joining forces with Maureen Sharib&#039;s company would be powerful and synergistic, plus beneficial to recruiters who want to learn everything under the sun in sourcing.... AIRS joining with an RPO just seems like a sales ploy more than anything. Doesn&#039;t set right with me either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I wouldn&#8217;t call it hypocrisy, because what is said IS true &#8211; people do need people, training helps both channels (direct sales and channel sales = recruiters and agencies). The concern is that AIRS is a training organization that is now part of an RPO. Is the organization really &#8220;vendor neutral&#8221;? The Right Thing is now a real end-to-end solution, pardon the overused market term, which is fine for some larger organizations&#8230;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know, JobMachine joining forces with Maureen Sharib&#8217;s company would be powerful and synergistic, plus beneficial to recruiters who want to learn everything under the sun in sourcing&#8230;. AIRS joining with an RPO just seems like a sales ploy more than anything. Doesn&#8217;t set right with me either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Gutmacher</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2008/02/18/airs-acquired-by-therightthing/comment-page-1/#comment-3481</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Gutmacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/2008/02/18/airs-acquired-by-therightthing/#comment-3481</guid>
		<description>There will continue to be more cost-effective alternatives to AIRS training (cyberrecruitingsecrets.com, recruiting-online.com, risetrends.com, etc., as well as higher-end training/consulting vendors like jobmachine.net).  Fortunately, the market keeps growing, so it&#039;s not clear that there&#039;s a problem.  You call it &quot;irony&quot; that companies of this type are merging.  Others would call it hypocrisy.  Time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There will continue to be more cost-effective alternatives to AIRS training (cyberrecruitingsecrets.com, recruiting-online.com, risetrends.com, etc., as well as higher-end training/consulting vendors like jobmachine.net).  Fortunately, the market keeps growing, so it&#8217;s not clear that there&#8217;s a problem.  You call it &#8220;irony&#8221; that companies of this type are merging.  Others would call it hypocrisy.  Time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
