<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sourcing and Recruiting a Mobile Workforce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ere.net/2007/01/05/sourcing-and-recruiting-a-mobile-workforce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ere.net/2007/01/05/sourcing-and-recruiting-a-mobile-workforce/</link>
	<description>Recruiting intelligence. Recruiting community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:18:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Maureen Sharib</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2007/01/05/sourcing-and-recruiting-a-mobile-workforce/comment-page-1/#comment-2248</link>
		<dc:creator>Maureen Sharib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 08:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/2007/01/05/sourcing-and-recruiting-a-mobile-workforce/#comment-2248</guid>
		<description>Lou, with interest I read your remarks about the ERE article you wrote many years ago.  I noticed in the employment market categories you remarked that some were ?increasing? and one was ?declining?.  Tracking your keen discernment into today, I offer the following metrics as recent that support your perceptive observations of yesterday.

I?d suggest your ?Very Active? category of yesterday, which you pegged at about 15 ? 20% of the total employment market, has increased to between 20 and 25%.  Your ?Semi-Active? group has also increased from about 25% to maybe even as much as 35%; your ?Semi-Passive? group has continued to expand from your estimate of 25% to probably around 30% today.  The largest difference I see in today?s employment market is in the group you pegged as ?declining?, the ?Very Passive? has indeed done so, from your 30% (several years ago) estimate to around 10 - 15% today.

Your exhortation to all of us to continue to grow and change within our industry hopefully will be widely heard.  I agree with you that opening a door is just the beginning ? closing it is every bit, if not more so, important!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lou, with interest I read your remarks about the ERE article you wrote many years ago.  I noticed in the employment market categories you remarked that some were ?increasing? and one was ?declining?.  Tracking your keen discernment into today, I offer the following metrics as recent that support your perceptive observations of yesterday.</p>
<p>I?d suggest your ?Very Active? category of yesterday, which you pegged at about 15 ? 20% of the total employment market, has increased to between 20 and 25%.  Your ?Semi-Active? group has also increased from about 25% to maybe even as much as 35%; your ?Semi-Passive? group has continued to expand from your estimate of 25% to probably around 30% today.  The largest difference I see in today?s employment market is in the group you pegged as ?declining?, the ?Very Passive? has indeed done so, from your 30% (several years ago) estimate to around 10 &#8211; 15% today.</p>
<p>Your exhortation to all of us to continue to grow and change within our industry hopefully will be widely heard.  I agree with you that opening a door is just the beginning ? closing it is every bit, if not more so, important!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
