<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Recruiting: A Retrospective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ere.net/2006/10/13/the-future-of-recruiting-a-retrospective/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ere.net/2006/10/13/the-future-of-recruiting-a-retrospective/</link>
	<description>Recruiting News, Recruiting Events, Recruiting Community, Social Recruiting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:35:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2006/10/13/the-future-of-recruiting-a-retrospective/comment-page-1/#comment-2028</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 02:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/2006/10/13/the-future-of-recruiting-a-retrospective/#comment-2028</guid>
		<description>I noted with interest the idea that HR users fail to maximize the opportunities presented by technology, as compared to their corporate colleagues in Sales, Finance etc.

I&#039;m wondering if anyone has heard of any independant research into successful implementations with corporations that might help us evaluate this more?

It seems to me that users alone can&#039;t be to blame for their dissatisfaction and low levels of interest, software companies should inspire, provide excellence in their services and function to relieve the stresses and strains of daily workload, combined with departmental leaders that know what to do with the resulting management information we can deliver...win in this way (and I think some of us are trying hard here) and HR users will find software as vital as accounting systems to finance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noted with interest the idea that HR users fail to maximize the opportunities presented by technology, as compared to their corporate colleagues in Sales, Finance etc.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering if anyone has heard of any independant research into successful implementations with corporations that might help us evaluate this more?</p>
<p>It seems to me that users alone can&#8217;t be to blame for their dissatisfaction and low levels of interest, software companies should inspire, provide excellence in their services and function to relieve the stresses and strains of daily workload, combined with departmental leaders that know what to do with the resulting management information we can deliver&#8230;win in this way (and I think some of us are trying hard here) and HR users will find software as vital as accounting systems to finance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Barbato</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2006/10/13/the-future-of-recruiting-a-retrospective/comment-page-1/#comment-2026</link>
		<dc:creator>David Barbato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/2006/10/13/the-future-of-recruiting-a-retrospective/#comment-2026</guid>
		<description>In the ?Outsourcing? section of today?s ERE newsletter, a sweeping and uncomplimentary assumption that all RPO firms are the same is made.  But not all outsourcing firms are alike. If you?re outsourcing and not getting better than average results there?s a problem with the firm you hired, not the RPO model. Thousands of companies have realized tremendous efficiencies and cost-savings using the RPO model when all parties involved are fully dedicated to delivering on their part of the process.  If the RPO is maintaining its side of the bargain, they will have taken the time to fully understand their clients? needs, including the culture, nuances, and other intangibles that are necessary in finding the perfect candidate. A good RPO firm applies process that takes all of these factors into account. If you?re not getting this added value from an RPO, switch providers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the ?Outsourcing? section of today?s ERE newsletter, a sweeping and uncomplimentary assumption that all RPO firms are the same is made.  But not all outsourcing firms are alike. If you?re outsourcing and not getting better than average results there?s a problem with the firm you hired, not the RPO model. Thousands of companies have realized tremendous efficiencies and cost-savings using the RPO model when all parties involved are fully dedicated to delivering on their part of the process.  If the RPO is maintaining its side of the bargain, they will have taken the time to fully understand their clients? needs, including the culture, nuances, and other intangibles that are necessary in finding the perfect candidate. A good RPO firm applies process that takes all of these factors into account. If you?re not getting this added value from an RPO, switch providers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
