<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finding the Best Person for the Job</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ere.net/2006/09/26/finding-the-best-person-for-the-job/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ere.net/2006/09/26/finding-the-best-person-for-the-job/</link>
	<description>Recruiting News, Recruiting Events, Recruiting Community, Social Recruiting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:35:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Frank Speer</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2006/09/26/finding-the-best-person-for-the-job/comment-page-1/#comment-1957</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Speer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/2006/09/26/finding-the-best-person-for-the-job/#comment-1957</guid>
		<description>Excellent article.  There have been many books written about this subject including 2 by Marcus Buckingham, &#039;First Break All the Rules&#039;, and &#039;Discover Your Strengths&#039; focusing on the importance of staying in your strengths as a person and managing your weaknesses.

The challenge is in digging deep during the interview process to uncover what motivates people and making certain that those motivations align well with the job opportunity.  It takes patience and diligence to do this well.  We are so focused on selling the opportunity or in looking at surface only (resume, success, experience) that we never get at the motivational characteristics of an individual. Studies have shown that the characteristics are consistent throughtout one&#039;s life including as early as our childhood.

The beauty about the concept is use can use the same core questions and techniques with everyone to uncover those motivations which allows you to get very good at the interviewing process. It also allows a candidate to make better decisions about aligning themselves with opportunites that will motivate them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article.  There have been many books written about this subject including 2 by Marcus Buckingham, &#8216;First Break All the Rules&#8217;, and &#8216;Discover Your Strengths&#8217; focusing on the importance of staying in your strengths as a person and managing your weaknesses.</p>
<p>The challenge is in digging deep during the interview process to uncover what motivates people and making certain that those motivations align well with the job opportunity.  It takes patience and diligence to do this well.  We are so focused on selling the opportunity or in looking at surface only (resume, success, experience) that we never get at the motivational characteristics of an individual. Studies have shown that the characteristics are consistent throughtout one&#8217;s life including as early as our childhood.</p>
<p>The beauty about the concept is use can use the same core questions and techniques with everyone to uncover those motivations which allows you to get very good at the interviewing process. It also allows a candidate to make better decisions about aligning themselves with opportunites that will motivate them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Melrose</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2006/09/26/finding-the-best-person-for-the-job/comment-page-1/#comment-1958</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Melrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 03:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/2006/09/26/finding-the-best-person-for-the-job/#comment-1958</guid>
		<description>Todd, thanks for this article.  It reminds me of the &#039;Let the Rabbits Run, A Parable&#039; from &#039;Soar with your Strengths&#039; (Clifton and Nelson).  Rabbits run and fish swim, and not vice versa.  The best fish do not run or jump well, at all.

The same is true for people and jobs.  Job match (fit) makes all the difference.  Beyond interwiewing to gauge &#039;natural point of aim&#039;, I recommend &#039;Total Person&#039; job-match-capable assessment instruments, like the Profile XT that headed Colleen Aylward&#039;s list of &#039;more affordable, yet robust examples&#039;, in her recent Monster.com Hiring Center article entitled &#039;Measuring Up&#039;.  Her introduction read: &#039;A new generation of assessment tools goes beyond measuring personality traits.  They take a more holistic approach to evaluating a candidate&#039;s ability to perform a job successfully.&#039;

I became acquainted with the Profile XT (PXT), three years ago. It measures thinking and reasoning styles, behavioral traits and occupational interests along twenty normal scales.  It compares (contrasts) candidate results with the composite pattern established by top performers in any position of interest.  It also includes a distortion factor that guards against &#039;polishing&#039;.

Most of us agree that job fit (match) matters, supremely, and we can all tell a fish from a rabbit.  But as a former CEO who made (and presided over) his share of hiring mistakes, I know that we can all use as much objective help as we can get, when it comes to matching people and positions.

The Profile XT dramatically raises the odds of putting the right people in the right seats.  And it does so quickly, conveniently, consistently, objectively, compliantly and very cost effectively.  The PXT complements and supplements behavioral interviews.  Moreover, PXT insights go beyond supporting a &#039;good hire&#039; to serve the downstream missions of development, promotion, retention and succession, as well.

Thanks again, Todd, for your perspective!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd, thanks for this article.  It reminds me of the &#8216;Let the Rabbits Run, A Parable&#8217; from &#8216;Soar with your Strengths&#8217; (Clifton and Nelson).  Rabbits run and fish swim, and not vice versa.  The best fish do not run or jump well, at all.</p>
<p>The same is true for people and jobs.  Job match (fit) makes all the difference.  Beyond interwiewing to gauge &#8216;natural point of aim&#8217;, I recommend &#8216;Total Person&#8217; job-match-capable assessment instruments, like the Profile XT that headed Colleen Aylward&#8217;s list of &#8216;more affordable, yet robust examples&#8217;, in her recent Monster.com Hiring Center article entitled &#8216;Measuring Up&#8217;.  Her introduction read: &#8216;A new generation of assessment tools goes beyond measuring personality traits.  They take a more holistic approach to evaluating a candidate&#8217;s ability to perform a job successfully.&#8217;</p>
<p>I became acquainted with the Profile XT (PXT), three years ago. It measures thinking and reasoning styles, behavioral traits and occupational interests along twenty normal scales.  It compares (contrasts) candidate results with the composite pattern established by top performers in any position of interest.  It also includes a distortion factor that guards against &#8216;polishing&#8217;.</p>
<p>Most of us agree that job fit (match) matters, supremely, and we can all tell a fish from a rabbit.  But as a former CEO who made (and presided over) his share of hiring mistakes, I know that we can all use as much objective help as we can get, when it comes to matching people and positions.</p>
<p>The Profile XT dramatically raises the odds of putting the right people in the right seats.  And it does so quickly, conveniently, consistently, objectively, compliantly and very cost effectively.  The PXT complements and supplements behavioral interviews.  Moreover, PXT insights go beyond supporting a &#8216;good hire&#8217; to serve the downstream missions of development, promotion, retention and succession, as well.</p>
<p>Thanks again, Todd, for your perspective!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Gaines</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2006/09/26/finding-the-best-person-for-the-job/comment-page-1/#comment-1955</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Gaines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/2006/09/26/finding-the-best-person-for-the-job/#comment-1955</guid>
		<description>Great article, Todd! I agree so much that I felt compelled to chime-in with a comment. In grad school, one of my professors asked students to complete the Highlands Ability Battery - an assessment built from worksamples that evaluates categories of tasks the test-taker has ease/difficulty completing and creates a profile to help guide career decisions. The thinking behind it is brilliant - and precisely what you stated in your article: that people are most successful in a line of work that takes advantage of their natural abilities. 

Talk to folks who are happy in their jobs, and chances are they are using their strongest natural abilities. Likewise, talk to folks who are unhappy at work, and chances are their jobs require skills that are not natural for them...and their natural abilities are being ignored. 

Definite food for thought. 

Thanks again for flicking that &#039;a-ha&#039; switch for so many! 

Best,
Victor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, Todd! I agree so much that I felt compelled to chime-in with a comment. In grad school, one of my professors asked students to complete the Highlands Ability Battery &#8211; an assessment built from worksamples that evaluates categories of tasks the test-taker has ease/difficulty completing and creates a profile to help guide career decisions. The thinking behind it is brilliant &#8211; and precisely what you stated in your article: that people are most successful in a line of work that takes advantage of their natural abilities. </p>
<p>Talk to folks who are happy in their jobs, and chances are they are using their strongest natural abilities. Likewise, talk to folks who are unhappy at work, and chances are their jobs require skills that are not natural for them&#8230;and their natural abilities are being ignored. </p>
<p>Definite food for thought. </p>
<p>Thanks again for flicking that &#8216;a-ha&#8217; switch for so many! </p>
<p>Best,<br />
Victor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2006/09/26/finding-the-best-person-for-the-job/comment-page-1/#comment-1954</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/2006/09/26/finding-the-best-person-for-the-job/#comment-1954</guid>
		<description>Thanks everyone.  I got several messages about the natural tendencies of poodles to hunt, given the history of the breed.  My mistake.  I should have chosen a shih tzu.  We used to have one of those and trust me, at least in this one shih tzu, retrieval is not in their character.

Regards,
THR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks everyone.  I got several messages about the natural tendencies of poodles to hunt, given the history of the breed.  My mistake.  I should have chosen a shih tzu.  We used to have one of those and trust me, at least in this one shih tzu, retrieval is not in their character.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
THR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Confidential</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2006/09/26/finding-the-best-person-for-the-job/comment-page-1/#comment-1953</link>
		<dc:creator>James Confidential</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/2006/09/26/finding-the-best-person-for-the-job/#comment-1953</guid>
		<description>This is one of the best articles I&#039;ve read on recruiting. . .Period.  If only we could find peoples&#039; &#039;natural point of aim&#039; earlier in their careers, I suspect many of us would find resumes that were less sticky, less messy, and a great deal more instructive.

I can&#039;t wait for you to write an article showing us how to guide the interview to get the information we need to make better choices.

Well done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the best articles I&#8217;ve read on recruiting. . .Period.  If only we could find peoples&#8217; &#8216;natural point of aim&#8217; earlier in their careers, I suspect many of us would find resumes that were less sticky, less messy, and a great deal more instructive.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait for you to write an article showing us how to guide the interview to get the information we need to make better choices.</p>
<p>Well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade Bumgarner</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2006/09/26/finding-the-best-person-for-the-job/comment-page-1/#comment-1952</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade Bumgarner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/2006/09/26/finding-the-best-person-for-the-job/#comment-1952</guid>
		<description>Todd,

A very insightful article!! I&#039;ve always excelled in sales (particularly recruiting) and I&#039;ve always been able to achieve top numbers with probably half the effort that my co-workers at the time had to expend to reach the same level....but....when asked how I did it I could never give a straight answer..not because I was trying to be evasive but rather because I truly didn&#039;t have a clue!! I just did what I did naturally and found success, I never really analyzed it. I now know the root of my own methodology and would love to find a whole crew with the same innate ability (wouldn&#039;t we all) but, as you said, easier said than done!! It&#039;s hard to identify something that the candidates themselves might not even be aware of. Even with all of the questioning you allude to, I still think it ultimately comes down to a proven track record of success, the right personality for the position and the company culture that surrounds them. You can put the best of the best in the worst of the worst and not achieve the desired results because of it. I believe those three things are the base ingredients to a successful hire.....finding them is another story altogether and will always be a gut decision crap shoot at times!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd,</p>
<p>A very insightful article!! I&#8217;ve always excelled in sales (particularly recruiting) and I&#8217;ve always been able to achieve top numbers with probably half the effort that my co-workers at the time had to expend to reach the same level&#8230;.but&#8230;.when asked how I did it I could never give a straight answer..not because I was trying to be evasive but rather because I truly didn&#8217;t have a clue!! I just did what I did naturally and found success, I never really analyzed it. I now know the root of my own methodology and would love to find a whole crew with the same innate ability (wouldn&#8217;t we all) but, as you said, easier said than done!! It&#8217;s hard to identify something that the candidates themselves might not even be aware of. Even with all of the questioning you allude to, I still think it ultimately comes down to a proven track record of success, the right personality for the position and the company culture that surrounds them. You can put the best of the best in the worst of the worst and not achieve the desired results because of it. I believe those three things are the base ingredients to a successful hire&#8230;..finding them is another story altogether and will always be a gut decision crap shoot at times!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Brilliant</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2006/09/26/finding-the-best-person-for-the-job/comment-page-1/#comment-1951</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Brilliant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 03:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/2006/09/26/finding-the-best-person-for-the-job/#comment-1951</guid>
		<description>To add additional insight to this idea of the &#039;Natural Point of Aim&#039;  I suggest you read a book called &#039;The Effective Executive&#039;, written by a slightly famous business guru named Peter Drucker. 

In his book there is a chapter called &#039;Making Strengths Productive&#039;.  This chapter speaks to basically the same notions of the Natural Point of Aim, whereby to get the most out of people you must identify their innate strengths and weaknesses and put them into roles that suit them best, regardless of what you have them doing now. Ultimately, this will provide the employee the opportunity to feel/be more productive, happier, and become a more valuable and loyal contributor to the organization.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To add additional insight to this idea of the &#8216;Natural Point of Aim&#8217;  I suggest you read a book called &#8216;The Effective Executive&#8217;, written by a slightly famous business guru named Peter Drucker. </p>
<p>In his book there is a chapter called &#8216;Making Strengths Productive&#8217;.  This chapter speaks to basically the same notions of the Natural Point of Aim, whereby to get the most out of people you must identify their innate strengths and weaknesses and put them into roles that suit them best, regardless of what you have them doing now. Ultimately, this will provide the employee the opportunity to feel/be more productive, happier, and become a more valuable and loyal contributor to the organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Williamson</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2006/09/26/finding-the-best-person-for-the-job/comment-page-1/#comment-1950</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Williamson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/2006/09/26/finding-the-best-person-for-the-job/#comment-1950</guid>
		<description>Todd:

From my own perspective as a job hopper, as a small business owner, and general dreamer and builder, you have absolutely hit the nail on the head.

Because someone has been doing something, does not mean they either like it or are excellent/passionate about it.

Now, how do we translate that into daily/weekly/monthly procedures and processes?

Shouldn&#039;t we find OUR natural point of aim, before we start looking for a candidates??

Sincerely,

Jon Williamson  IT Manager, Webmaster, Candidate Recruiting

Williamson Employment Services, Inc.
213 Hilltop Rd. 
St. Joseph, MI 49085 
 
Are you LinkedIn?  If so, send me a connection request!  
If not, visit my profile at https://www.linkedin.com/in/jonwilliamson for information.

My Main Phone: 	269-353-4735	 
Fax:			269-983-8955  
Cell Phone:		269-325-5559 
Corporate Office: 	269-983-0142 or 800-226-6801 		
Skype:			williamson_jon
Gtalk:			williamsonjon  
email:			jw@williamsonemployment.com

Other IM contact information available on request</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd:</p>
<p>From my own perspective as a job hopper, as a small business owner, and general dreamer and builder, you have absolutely hit the nail on the head.</p>
<p>Because someone has been doing something, does not mean they either like it or are excellent/passionate about it.</p>
<p>Now, how do we translate that into daily/weekly/monthly procedures and processes?</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t we find OUR natural point of aim, before we start looking for a candidates??</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Jon Williamson  IT Manager, Webmaster, Candidate Recruiting</p>
<p>Williamson Employment Services, Inc.<br />
213 Hilltop Rd.<br />
St. Joseph, MI 49085 </p>
<p>Are you LinkedIn?  If so, send me a connection request!<br />
If not, visit my profile at <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/jonwilliamson" rel="nofollow">https://www.linkedin.com/in/jonwilliamson</a> for information.</p>
<p>My Main Phone: 	269-353-4735<br />
Fax:			269-983-8955<br />
Cell Phone:		269-325-5559<br />
Corporate Office: 	269-983-0142 or 800-226-6801<br />
Skype:			williamson_jon<br />
Gtalk:			williamsonjon<br />
email:			<a href="mailto:jw@williamsonemployment.com">jw@williamsonemployment.com</a></p>
<p>Other IM contact information available on request</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
