<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Hire Better Salespeople</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ere.net/2006/08/25/how-to-hire-better-salespeople/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ere.net/2006/08/25/how-to-hire-better-salespeople/</link>
	<description>Recruiting intelligence. Recruiting community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 09:18:04 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug Lapasta</title>
		<link>http://www.ere.net/2006/08/25/how-to-hire-better-salespeople/comment-page-1/#comment-1904</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Lapasta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ere.net/2006/08/25/how-to-hire-better-salespeople/#comment-1904</guid>
		<description>Lou Adler suggests an excellent and effective behavioral interviewing technique --I would wholeheatedly endorse and recommend it --In addition though , I have found that obtaining  frank and candid input from a candidate&#039;s former customers and managers-- on the candidate&#039;s use of job and company-specific competencies-- helps focus the interview process and guards against the real possibility that the candidate has prepared him/herself ( using readily available  books -web-guides and perhaps  even Lou&#039;s article) for the most thorough and  rigorous behavioral interview questions 
Having 3rd party verification of what a candidate tells you  about their accomplishments helps ensure that your sales candidate hasnt sold you a very expensive bill of goods --Such candid feedback is easy to obtain if specific input is not attributed to specific individuals --the questions are clear and competency-based and the means of transmitting the information is quick and easy
In summary --there are a lot of great tools (as Lou so clearly demonstrates) --but when it comes to making critical hiring decisions --its a good idea to use more than one or two-- to give yourself the most accurate and complete picture of the candidate you can possibly get
Doug LaPasta --Skillsurvey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lou Adler suggests an excellent and effective behavioral interviewing technique &#8211;I would wholeheatedly endorse and recommend it &#8211;In addition though , I have found that obtaining  frank and candid input from a candidate&#8217;s former customers and managers&#8211; on the candidate&#8217;s use of job and company-specific competencies&#8211; helps focus the interview process and guards against the real possibility that the candidate has prepared him/herself ( using readily available  books -web-guides and perhaps  even Lou&#8217;s article) for the most thorough and  rigorous behavioral interview questions<br />
Having 3rd party verification of what a candidate tells you  about their accomplishments helps ensure that your sales candidate hasnt sold you a very expensive bill of goods &#8211;Such candid feedback is easy to obtain if specific input is not attributed to specific individuals &#8211;the questions are clear and competency-based and the means of transmitting the information is quick and easy<br />
In summary &#8211;there are a lot of great tools (as Lou so clearly demonstrates) &#8211;but when it comes to making critical hiring decisions &#8211;its a good idea to use more than one or two&#8211; to give yourself the most accurate and complete picture of the candidate you can possibly get<br />
Doug LaPasta &#8211;Skillsurvey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
